The study aims to investigate whether oral betablocker (BB) therapy is superior to no such treatment following an acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
This is a prospective, randomized, open blinded end-point (PROBE) study. Patients with AMI will be randomized 1-8 days following PCI or thrombolysis, and allocated to either prescription of a BB or to no such prescription. Subjects will be followed up for at least 6 months (median 3 years) with respect to the primary and secondary endpoints. The primary end point, the key secondary end points, and most other secondary end points will be analysed and published jointly with data from the 'Danish Trial of Beta-blocker therapy after myocardial infarction without heart failure' (DANBLOCK) (NCT 03778554) (please see below). The primary objective is to test whether oral BB therapy reduces the risk of all-cause death, recurrent MI, incident heart failure, unplanned coronary revascularization, ischemic stroke, or malignant ventricular arrhythmia including resuscitated cardiac arrest of cardiac origin compared to no such therapy, in patients with AMI treated with PCI or thrombolysis without reduced LVEF. The key secondary objectives (planned for the main study) are: * To study whether oral BB therapy reduces the risk of each of the components of the primary end-point separately, compared to no such therapy * To assess clinical outcomes linked BB therapy in the following subgroups: age (tertiles\< 70 years vs. ≥70 years), gender sex (men vs. women), country (Denmark vs Norway), BB dosage tertiles (dosage at randomization (\<50 mg vs. ≥50 mg), hypertension (yes vs. no), diabetes (yes vs. no), diabetes (yes vs no), type of MI (STEMI vs. NSTEMI), and LVEF subgroups (preserved LVEF: ≥50% vs. mid-range LVEF: 40-49%). * To study whether oral BB therapy increases the risk of hospitalization for second or third-degree atrioventricular block or implantation of pacemaker. * To describe BB dosage and adherence at six months following randomization obtained from the national prescription registries * To assess study safety Other secondary objectives (for joint BETAMI-DANBLOCK sub-studies) are: * To study whether oral BB therapy reduces the risk of cardiovascular death compared to no such therapy * To study whether oral BB therapy reduces the risk of stable and unstable angina compared to no such therapy * To study whether oral BB therapy reduces the risk of atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter or other atrial tachyarrhythmias compared to no such therapy * To study whether oral BB therapy increases the risk of hospitalization for bradycardia or syncope. * To study whether oral BB therapy increases the risk of hospitalization for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma or peripheral artery disease. * To study whether oral BB therapy affects the following patient related outcomes: quality of life, angina, dyspnoea, anxiety, depression, sexual dysfunction or sleep disorders * To describe long term BB adherence obtained from the national prescription registries * To study sociodemographic, clinical, and psychosocial characteristics (PROMS and clinical data) between the two study arms and in the total sample * To conduct cost-utility analysis in relation to quality of life and a health economic evaluation including drug use, health care utilization, employment, income, and benefit take-up Exploratory objectives (based on BETAMI data, only): * To study the proportion and predictors of non-adherence with BB, statins and other cardiovascular drugs assessed by direct methods quantifying drug concentrations in blood * Identify pharmacokinetic, pharmacogenetic and pharmacodynamic markers associated with side-effects and suboptimal response to treatment with cardiovascular drugs The primary study end-points will be obtained through linkage to the Norwegian Cardiovascular Disease Registry and The Norwegian Population Registry (Folkeregisteret) Secondary endpoints will be obtained by linkage to the following national registries: The Norwegian Population Registry (Folkeregisteret), the Cause of Death Registry, the Norwegian Patient Registry, the Norwegian Cardiovascular Disease Registry, the Norwegian Prescription Database, the Norwegian registry for income, the FD-Trygd database (social security micro data for research) and the Control and payment of reimbursements to health service providers (KUHR) database. Further by collecting self-reported questionnaires and a clinical examination with blood sample collection. Primary safety endpoints: • To describe the composite endpoint of malignant ventricular arrhythmias including resuscitated cardiac arrest of cardiac origin, incident heart failure, new MI or all-cause death at 30 days after randomization collected from i. direct telephone contact with the patient and from hospital medical records, ii. linkage to the Norwegian Cardiovascular Disease Registry and The Norwegian Population Registry at study end. Other safety endpoints: * To describe all-cause death at study end * To describe Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction (SUSARs) during the follow-up period from the study database (continously reported by local investigators). Rationale for combining data from the BETAMI study with the DANBLOCK (NCT03778554) study from Denmark: The trials have similar designs, only minor differences in study entry criteria, and were, from the very beginning, coordinated with the aim of conducting sub-studies on pooled data. However, the inclusion- and event rates have been lower than expected in both studies. To enhance feasibility, the final decision was made from both Steering Committees in May 2021 to combine the trials and publish initial results jointly. BETAMI and DANBLOCK will remain separate trials until the end of follow-up, where data from the trials will be combined and main results published together. Sample size: A total of approximately 2900 patients from BETAMI will be recruited and randomized 1:1 to BB treatment (type and dosage according to treating physician) or no BB treatment within 8 days of MI. The study is event driven and a power calculation for the combined DANBLOCK-BETAMI trial has been performed in which 950 events will provide a power of 80% to detect a true treatment effect equal to a hazard ratio of 1.2 for no beta-blocker therapy. Follow-up: Patients will be followed from the randomization date until end of follow-up. The last patient included will be followed for a minimum of 6 months. Estimated mean (non) treatment duration is 3 (0.5-6) years. Post-trial objective: • To perform a joint analysis of the data from BETAMI-DANBLOCK with the REDUCE (NCT03278509), CAPITAL-RCT (NCT01155635) and REBOOT (NCT03596385) trials. This analysis will comprise approximately 19000 patients, giving increased power and precision for clinical decisions on both primary and secondary endpoints.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
2,895
No betablocker will be administered. Patients randomized to no beta-blockade will be discouraged to use beta-blockade as long as there is no other indication than strictly secondary prevention after myocardial infarction. Any other treatment or management is to be given as per usual care.
A betablocker will be administered. To reflect contemporary management, for which this study is designed to test, there will not be a defined minimum dosage. The type and dose of BB will be left at the discretion of the PI. Generic drug and accepted dosages will be: * Metoprolol succinate up to a total dose of 200mg daily * Bisoprolol up to a total dose of 10mg daily * Carvedilol up to a total dose of 50mg daily The treating physician will be encouraged to aim for an equipotent dose of 100 mg metoprolol succinate or higher. Any other treatment or management is to be given as per usual care.
Sørlandet Sykehus
Arendal, Norway
Haukeland Universitetssykehus
Bergen, Norway
A composite of death of any cause, recurrent myocardial infarction, incident heart failure, coronary revascularization, ischemic stroke, malignant ventricular arrhythmia including resuscitated cardiac arrest of cardiac origin
Incidence of combined endpoint from randomization. Estimated maximal follow-up for each patient for this outcome is 6 months to 6 years
Time frame: 6 months (minimum) to 6 years (maximum)
Recurrent MI
Time to recurrent MI from randomization. Estimated maximal follow-up for each patient for this outcome is 6 months to 6 years
Time frame: 6 months (minimum) to 6 years (maximum)
All-cause death
Time to a-cause Death from randomization. Estimated maximal follow-up for each patient for this outcome is 6 months to 6 years
Time frame: 6 months (minimum) to 6 years (maximum)
Malignant ventricular arrhythmias including resuscitated cardiac arrest of cardiac origin
Time to malignant ventricular arrhythmia including resuscitated cardiac arrest of cardiac origin from randomization. Estimated maximal follow-up for each patient for this outcome is 6 months to 6 years
Time frame: 6 months (minimum) to 6 years (maximum)
Hospitalization or outpatient consultation for incident heart failure
Time to hospitalization or outpatient consultation for heart failure from randomization. Estimated maximal follow-up for each patient for this outcome is 6 months to 6 years
Time frame: 6 months (minimum) to 6 years (maximum)
Unplanned coronary revascularization
Time to unplanned coronary revascularization from randomization. Estimated maximal follow-up for each patient for this outcome is 6 months to 6 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Nordlandssykehuset HF Bodø
Bodø, Norway
Drammen Hospital
Drammen, Norway
Sykehuset Østfold Kalnes
Fredrikstad, Norway
Sykehuset Innlandet HF, Gjøvik Sykehus
Gjøvik, Norway
Sykehuset Innlandet Hamar
Hamar, Norway
Vestre Viken HF, Ringerike Sykehus
Hønefoss, Norway
Sykehuset Innlandet Lillehammer
Lillehammer, Norway
AHUS
Lørenskog, Norway
...and 10 more locations
Time frame: 6 months (minimum) to 6 years (maximum)
Ischemic stroke
Time to ischemic stroke from randomization. Estimated maximal follow-up for each patient for this outcome is 6 months to 6 years
Time frame: 6 months (minimum) to 6 years (maximum)
Cardiovascular death
Time to cardiovascular death from randomization. Estimated maximal follow-up for each patient for this outcome is 6 months to 6 years
Time frame: 6 months (minimum) to 6 years (maximum)
Hospitalization for stable and unstable angina
Time to hospitalization for stable and unstable angina from randomization. Estimated maximal follow-up for each patient for this outcome is 6 months to 6 years
Time frame: 6 months (minimum) to 6 years (maximum)
Hospitalization for atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter or other atrial tachyarrhythmias
Time to hospitalization for atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter or other atrial tachyarrhythmias from randomization. Estimated maximal follow-up for each patient for this outcome is 6 months to 6 years
Time frame: 6 months (minimum) to 6 years (maximum)
Hospitalization for bradycardia, syncope or implantation of pacemaker
Time to hospitalization for bradycardia, syncope or implantation of pacemaker from randomization. Estimated maximal follow-up for each patient for this outcome I 6 months to 6 years
Time frame: 6 months (minimum) to 6 years (maximum)
Hospitalization for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma or peripheral artery disease
Time to hospitalization for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma or peripheral artery disease from randomization. Estimated maximal follow-up for each patient for this outcome is 6 months to 6 years
Time frame: 6 months (minimum) to 6 years (maximum)
Angina symptoms
Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) grading of angina pectoris.
Time frame: Through self-report questionnaires administered at inclusion, 30 days, 3,6 and 18 months
Health-related quality of life
Health-related quality of life measured by the Short Form (SF) 12
Time frame: Through self-report questionnaires administered at inclusion, 30 days, 3,6 and 18 months
Measures of depression and anxiety
HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
Time frame: Through self-report questionnaires administered at inclusion, 30 days, 3,6 and 18 months
Measures of sexual dysfunction
The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)
Time frame: Through self-report questionnaires administered at inclusion, 30 days, 3,6 and 18 months
Measures of sleep disorders
Bergen insomnia Scale
Time frame: Through self-report questionnaires administered at inclusion, 30 days, 3,6 and 18 months
Measures of sleep disorders
Bergen insomnia Scale and sleep duration
Time frame: Through self-report questionnaires administered at inclusion, 30 days, 3,6 and 18 months
Measures of Nightmare Frequency
Nightmare Frequency Questionnaire
Time frame: Through self-report questionnaires administered at inclusion, 30 days, 3,6 and 18 months