The purpose of the protocol, is to describe the use of cabozantinib tablets as monotherapy or in combination with nivolumab including the number of dose reductions, dose interruptions and terminations due to (serious) adverse events in subjects with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated in real-life clinical setting in 1st line treatment.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
224
Landeskrankenhaus Hochsteiermark
Leoben, Austria
Kepler Universitätsklinikum GmbH
Linz, Austria
Uniklinikum Salzburg
Salzburg, Austria
Salzkammergutklinikum Vöcklabruck
Vöcklabruck, Austria
Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen GmbH
Wels, Austria
Universitätsklinikum Aachen
Aachen, Germany
Urologisches Zentrum Euregio
Aachen, Germany
Onkologie aschaffenburg
Aschaffenburg, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Augsburg A.ö.R
Augsburg, Germany
MVZ Taunus GmbH
Bad Homburg, Germany
...and 72 more locations
The proportion of subjects with dose reduction of cabozantinib due to Serious Adverse Events/Adverse Events (SAEs/AEs)
The proportion of subjects with ≥1 dose reduction due to AE will be described with its 95% confidence interval, by risk group and overall.
Time frame: 2 years
The proportion of subjects with dose interruption of cabozantinib and/or nivolumab due to SAEs/AEs
The proportion of subjects with ≥1 dose interruption due to AE will be described with its 95% confidence interval, by risk group and overall.
Time frame: 2 years
The proportion of subjects with termination of cabozantinib /cabozantinib-nivolumab combination due to SAEs/AEs
The proportion of subjects with ≥1 discontinuation due to AE will be described with its 95% confidence interval, by risk group and overall.
Time frame: 2 years
Number of injection delayed of nivolumab due to SAE/AE
Time frame: 2 years
Progression free survival (PFS)
Progression free survival is defined as the time between the start date of cabozantinib and the date of progression or death from any cause. Disease progression is defined as either radiological progression assessed by the investigator using RECIST 1.1 or clinical progression.
Time frame: 2 years
Best overall response - Overall Response Rate (ORR)
The best overall response is the best response assessed by investigator recorded during the treatment period. ORR is defined as the proportion of subjects achieving complete or partial response.
Time frame: 2 years
Best overall response - Disease Control Rate (DCR)
The best overall response is the best response assessed by investigator recorded during the treatment period. DCR is defined as the proportion of subjects achieving a complete response, partial response or stable disease.
Time frame: 2 years
All non-serious and serious adverse events (AEs / SAEs) and fatal outcomes
Safety: clinical parameter, as routinely assessed by the investigator, as well as occurrence of all serious and non-serious AEs as well as fatal outcomes and special situations. The adverse events will be described overall and also according to level of physical activity assessed by questionnaire and actigraph.
Time frame: 2 years
Impact of the activity level at baseline on the occurrence of adverse events (AEs)
Safety: clinical parameter, as routinely assessed by the investigator, as well as occurrence of all serious and non-serious AEs as well as fatal outcomes and special situations; data of activity level and quality of life will be collected using the quality of life questionnaire (NFKSI-19 questionnaire) and the activity questionnaire; inflammatory blood markers, as routinely assessed by the investigator, will be captured.
Time frame: 2 years
The proportion of subjects with termination due to SAEs/AEs in sub-group
The proportion of subjects with ≥1 termination due to AE will be described with its 95% confidence interval, by risk group and overall split by histological subtype (clear cell and non-clear cell).
Time frame: 2 year
The proportion of subjects with dose interruption due to SAEs/AEs in sub-group
The proportion of subjects with ≥1 dose interruption due to AE will be described with its 95% confidence interval, by risk group and overall split by histological subtype (clear cell and non-clear cell).
Time frame: 2 year
The proportion of subjects with dose reduction due to SAEs/AEs in sub-group
The proportion of subjects with ≥1 dose reduction due to AE will be described with its 95% confidence interval, by risk group and overall split by histological subtype (clear cell and non-clear cell).
Time frame: 2 years
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.