In the Care in Rheumatoid Arthritis (CareRA) trial (NCT01172639) about 70% of early RA patients are in remission at the 2 year evaluation point independent of the combination scheme used. Interesting to see is that the 30% of insufficient responders can be identified in an early stage of the treatment course. The purpose of the present study is to investigate if, for patients with an insufficient response to a COBRA-Slim regimen, accelerated access to a short course of anti-TNF therapy already early after treatment initiation (from w8 until w32) could improve outcomes compared to a more traditional treat to target sequence.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
276
Etanercept 50mg subcutaneous (SC) weekly added for 24 weeks to COBRA-Slim scheme
Leflunomide 10mg PO daily added to the COBRA-Slim scheme
Imelda Ziekenhuis Bonheiden
Bonheiden, Antwerpen, Belgium
AZ Herentals
Herentals, Antwerpen, Belgium
ZNA Jan Palfijn
Merksem, Antwerpen, Belgium
GHdC Saint Joseph
Gilly, Henegouwen, Belgium
Reuma centrum Genk
Genk, Limburg, Belgium
Reuma Clinic Genk
Genk, Limburg, Belgium
Reuma Instituut Hasselt
Hasselt, Limburg, Belgium
CHU UCL Namur ASBL Site Godinne
Yvoir, Namur, Belgium
OLV Ziekenhuis Aalst
Aalst, Oost Vlaanderen, Belgium
Regionaal Ziekenhuis Heilig Hart Leuven
Leuven, Vlaams Brabant, Belgium
...and 9 more locations
Area Under Curve (AUC) of Disease Activity Score Based on a 28 Jointcount and C-reactive Protein (DAS28CRP)
Analysis was based on an intention to treat population, which focused on all patients randomized into the study, irrespective if they actually received the randomized treatment. Fifty-five patients were allocated to Standard COBRA-Slim and 55 to COBRA-Slim Bio-induction. This measure is an indication of the total disease-activity over time or long-term effectiveness, a higher area under the curve indicates a higher disease activity over time and so a lower effectiveness over the time frame of the trial. The scale range for the duration of the trial (104 weeks) is 0.0 to 977.6 * remission: value below 270.4 * low disease activity: from 270.4 till 332.8 (included) * moderate disease activity: above 332.8 till 530.4 * high disease activity: above 530.4
Time frame: baseline, w4, w8, w16, w24, w32, w40, w52, w64, w78, w92 and w104
Proportion of Insufficient Responders Achieving Remission (DAS28CRP<2.6) 28 Weeks After Randomization (Short Term Efficacy) to Either COBRA-Slim Bio-Induction or Standard COBRA-Slim Induction
Short-time efficacy of disease activity based on a swollen and tender joint count of 28 joints and C-reactive proteine (scale range 0.0 to 9.4; remission: value below 2.6; low disease activity: from 2.6 till 3.2 (included); moderate disease activity: above 3.2 till 5.1; high disease activity: above 5.1).
Time frame: From randomization till 28 weeks after randomization.
Proportion of Patients in Remission Defined as DAS28CRP<2.6
Short-time efficacy of disease activity based on a swollen and tender joint count of 28 joints and C-reactive proteine (scale range 0.0 to 9.4; remission: value below 2.6; low disease activity: from 2.6 till 3.2 (included); moderate disease activity: above 3.2 till 5.1; high disease activity: above 5.1).
Time frame: at week 104
Proportion of Patients Achieving a EULAR Response
proportion of patients achieving a EULAR response, based on actual disease activity on a tender/swollen joint count and C-reactive proteine (DAS28-CRP) 28 weeks after randomization and improvement in DAS28-CRP from baseline. The EULAR response criteria classify patients as good, moderate or non-responders, using the individual amount of change in the DAS28-CRP and the DAS28-CRP value (low, moderate, or high) reached according to the following tabel: DAS28-CRP at endpoint improvement in DAS28-CRP from baseline \<=1,2 \>0,6 and \<= 1,2 \<=0,6 \<= 3,2 good moderate none \>3,2 and \<= 5,1 moderate moderate none \>5,1 moderate none none Additionally all patients with a good response were also included in the number of participants with at least a moderate response.
Time frame: at 28 weeks after randomization
Proportion of Patients Achieving a EULAR Response
proportion of patients achieving a EULAR response, based on actual disease activity on a tender/swollen joint count and C-reactive proteine (DAS28-CRP) at week 104 and improvement in DAS28-CRP from baseline. The EULAR response criteria classify patients as good, moderate or non-responders, using the individual amount of change in the DAS28-CRP and the DAS28-CRP value (low, moderate, or high) reached according to the following tabel: DAS28-CRP at endpoint improvement in DAS28-CRP from baseline \<=1,2 \>0,6 and \<= 1,2 \<=0,6 \<= 3,2 good moderate none \>3,2 and \<= 5,1 moderate moderate none \>5,1 moderate none none Additionally all patients with a good response were also included in the number of participants with at least a moderate response.
Time frame: at week 104
Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Response
HAQ measures physical function as reported by the patient, total score range from 0-3 of which higher scores represent worse physical function.
Time frame: at 28 weeks after randomization
Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Response
HAQ measures physical function as reported by the patient, total score range from 0-3 of which higher scores represent worse physical function.
Time frame: at week 104
Radiographic Progression
Radiographic progression at week 52 is scored according to the Sharp-Van der Heijde score (SvdH). The SvdH method scores the presence of erosions in 16 joints of hands and wrists (graded from 0 to 5), and in 6 joints of the feet (graded from 0 to 10), and the presence of joint space narrowing in 15 joints of the hands and wrists (graded from 0 to 4) and in 6 joints of the feet (graded from 0 to 4). The maximal range is 280 units for erosion and 168 units for joint space narrowing, summing up to 448 units for the total score. The progression is calculated by subtracting the total score at week 52 minus the total score at baseline (ranging from 0 to 448) Higher values in each (sub) scale represents a worse outcome.
Time frame: at week 52
Radiographic Progression
Radiographic progression at week 104 is scored according to the Sharp-Van der Heijde score (SvdH). The SvdH method scores the presence of erosions in 16 joints of hands and wrists (graded from 0 to 5), and in 6 joints of the feet (graded from 0 to 10), and the presence of joint space narrowing in 15 joints of the hands and wrists (graded from 0 to 4) and in 6 joints of the feet (graded from 0 to 4). The maximal range is 280 units for erosion and 168 units for joint space narrowing, summing up to 448 units for the total score. The progression is calculated by subtracting the total score at week 104 minus the total score at baseline (ranging from 0 to 448) Higher values in each (sub) scale represents a worse outcome.
Time frame: at week 104
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.