This study is conducted by a working group of the French Society of Medical Physics (SFPM). Its main aim is to establish reference dose levels for the most common procedures performed in operating rooms using mobile X-ray systems, hence helping medical physicists and surgeons to evaluate their practice and optimize patient radiation protection. This is a multi-centric prospective study involving 73 medical institutions of different categories (public university hospitals, clinics, centers dedicated to cancer treatment, etc.). It consists on progressively collecting anonymous data for 15 to 30 procedures from a list of 62 types of procedures, belonging to 7 surgery specialties (neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, digestive surgery, urology, cardiology, vascular surgery and multi-specialty). Collected data include patient BMI and information about the X-ray equipment, the medical procedure and the dosimetric parameters. Data collection doesn't require the access to the patient medical record and doesn't impact his medical care. Proposed dose reference levels will be expressed in terms of KAP (Kerma-Area-Product), fluoroscopy time and air Kerma. Moreover, multiple statistical analyses will be done to investigate the impact of different variables on the procedure X-ray doses.
Context: Reference dose levels, introduced by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) in 1996, are intended to help professionals using medical imaging to evaluate their practice and optimize patient's doses. European directive 2013/59/Euratom emphasizes the need to establish, use and regularly review reference levels for diagnostic and interventional procedures and to publish guidelines on this topic. Furthermore, national reference levels were established for conventional radiology and CT exams. They are used as a tool for the optimization of medical practices. Besides, a working group of the French Society of Medical Physics (SFPM) has published in 2017 reference levels for interventional radiology procedures performed in a dedicated room and using fixed angiographic equipment. Although radiation protection is a big challenge encountered in operating rooms using mobile X-ray equipment, few data are available in the literature regarding the use of this type of equipment. In this context, the SFPM suggested the creation of a working group in 2017 to establish reference levels for the main procedures realized in the operating rooms using mobile X-ray systems. The aim of this working group is to help medical physicists and surgeons in evaluating their practice and optimizing patient radiation protection. Scope of the study: The main purpose of the study is to establish dosimetric reference levels, in terms of KAP (Kerma-Area-Product). Additional objectives consist on proposing reference levels in terms of fluoroscopy time and air kerma and on studying the impact of different parameters (surgical specialty, body mass index, use of zoom, fluoroscopy pulse rate) on the delivered doses. Study type and cohort: This is a multi-centric prospective study which consists on progressively collecting anonymous data for 15 to 30 procedures from a list of 62 surgical procedures (n=62) belonging to 7 different surgery specialties. Selected specialties are neurosurgery (n=12), orthopedic surgery (n=15), digestive surgery (n=6), urology (n=10), cardiology (n=6), vascular surgery (n=11), multi-specialty (n=2). 73 health institutions of different categories (University hospitals, clinics, centers dedicated to cancer treatment, etc..) confirmed their participations to the study. Data collection: Data will be collected using a password-protected Excel spreadsheet. This excel file will be sent to all the participating institutions at the beginning of data collection. Every institution will send the excel file completed with anonymized data to the scientific responsible of the study through the secure email server of the APHP (Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris)) institution. Analysis: The main goal of this study is to publish descriptive statistics parameters (mean, standard deviation, median, 1st quartile, 3rd quartile) for each dosimetric data (KAP, fluoroscopy time, kerma, etc..) and for each category of surgical procedures. Results will be presented with a 95 percentage confidence interval. Moreover, correlation analysis between several variables will be done. The differences between detector and equipment technologies will be also studied using appropriate statistical tests.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
8,840
Hopital Lariboisiere
Paris, France
Total KAP (Kerma-Air-Product)
KAP or Kerma-Area-Product is the main dosimetric parameter representing the patient exposure. Participants should choose the appropriate unit of the KAP among a list of five units (microGray.m², milliGray.centimeter², centiGray.centimeter², deciGray.centimeter², Gray.centimeter²). Note that Gray is the international unit of the radiation quantity.
Time frame: KAP is provided by the X-ray equipment at the end of the procedure.
Year of construction of the equipment and date of the last external quality control (QC) (yyyy)
Year of construction of the equipment and date of the last external quality control
Time frame: baseline
Image receptor type of the equipment
Participants should specify whether the images are obtained using a flat panel detector or an X-ray image intensifier.
Time frame: baseline
DACS Connection
Participants should specify If the X-ray equipment is connected to a Dose Archiving and a Communication system (DACS) (Yes/no)
Time frame: baseline
Patient weight (kg) and height (cm)
Weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m\^2.
Time frame: Patient weight and height are provided from the equipment or given by the medical team during the procedure
Size of Fields of View (FOV) (cm)
Size of the smallest and largest Field of View (FOV); size of the largest FOV adapted to the size of the phantom; size of the most used FOV for the concerned procedure. (cm)
Time frame: Baseline, The most used FOV during the procedure is provided by the medical staff
Differences between the displayed and measured X-ray doses (percentage)
Differences between the displayed and measured KAP for the smallest and biggest FOV; Differences between the displayed and measured air kerma available in the last quality control (QC) report. (Percentages).
Time frame: baseline
Total air kerma of the procedure including the one performed of an O-arm equipment
Participants should specify the unit by choosing the appropriate one among a list of 5 units (micro Gray, milli Gray, centi Gray, deci Gray, Gray).
Time frame: Data are provided by the X-ray equipment at the end of the procedure
Total number of image frames (number)
Total number of image frames (number)
Time frame: Data are provided by the X-ray equipment at the end of the procedure
Fluoroscopy mode used during the procedure
Participants should specify whether continuous, pulsed or mixed fluoroscopy modes are used during the procedure
Time frame: Data are provided by the X-ray equipment at the end of the procedure
Fluoroscopy pulse rate ( pulses/second)
Time frame: Data are provided by the X-ray equipment at the end of the procedure
Fluoroscopy time (hh:mm:ss) of the procedure including the one performed of an O-arm equipment
Time frame: Data are provided by the X-ray equipment at the end of the procedure
KAP (Kerma-Area-Product) attributable to fluoroscopy
Participants should choose the appropriate unit of the KAP among a list of five units (µGy.m², mGy.cm², cGy.cm², dGy.cm², Gy.cm²).
Time frame: Data are provided by the X-ray equipment at the end of the procedure
Medical specialty of the procedure
Participants should specify the medical specialty of the procedure by selecting one from a predefined list of seven categories: Orthopedic surgery, neurosurgery, cardiology, vascular surgery, urology, digestive surgery and multi-specialty.
Time frame: Data are provided by the medical staff during the procedure
Name/type of the procedure
Participants should specify the medical description of the procedure.
Time frame: Data are provided by the medical staff during the procedure
Additional information about the procedure giving further indications about the used materials or the anatomical region of interest.
Time frame: Data are provided by the medical staff during the procedure
Total KAP for procedures performed on an O-arm equipment
Participants should choose the appropriate unit of the KAP among a list of five units (µGy.m², mGy.cm², cGy.cm², dGy.cm², Gy.cm²).
Time frame: KAP is provided by the X-ray equipment at the end of the procedure
Total DLP (Dose-Length-Product) of the procedures performed on an O-arm equipment.DLP is always expressed in mGy.cm.
The DLP (Dose Length Product) is expressed in milliGray \*centimeters (mGy.cm)
Time frame: DLP is provided by the X-ray equipment at the end of the procedure
CTDIvol (Volume Computed Tomography Dose Index) of the procedures performed on an O-arm equipment. CTDI is always expressed in mGy.
The CTDIvol is a standardized measure of radiation dose output of a CT scanner. This dose is expressed in milliGrays (mGy).
Time frame: CTDIvol is provided by the X-ray equipment at the end of the procedure
Type of the dosimetric phantom used to calculate the CTDI of an acquisition for the procedures performed on an O-arm equipment.
Participants should select between a "head phantom (16 cm)" or a "body phantom (32 cm)"
Time frame: Data are provided by the X-ray equipment at the end of the procedure
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.