This is a prospective, open label, dose-escalating, multicenter clinical investigation to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of THIODERM STRONG in the correction of nasolabial folds. The performance is assessed using the 5-point Nasolabial Folds Severity Rating Scale (NLF-SRS) at Week 12 compared to baseline.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
74
Soft tissue filler containing crosslinked hyaluronic acid and Na-hyaluronate, supplemented with lidocaine hydrochloride as ancillary substance.
Medizinsche Universität Graz-Klinikum für Dermatologie und Venerologie
Graz, Austria
Yuvell
Vienna, Austria
Cohort 1: Frequency, severity, seriousness and causal relationship of AEs
Time frame: Up to 4 weeks
Cohort 1: Local tolerability assessment based on presence and intensity of erythema, swelling and skin hardening
5-grade scale ranging from 0 (absent), over 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), to 4 (severe)
Time frame: Up to 4 weeks
Cohort 2: Improvement of at least 1 point on the Nasolabial Folds Severity Rating Scale (NLF-SRS) based on investigator's live assessment
Scale from 0 (=none/ minimal) to 4 (= extreme)
Time frame: Week 12 compared to baseline
Cohort 2: Response rate based on investigator's assessment of Nasolabial Folds Severity Rating Scale (NLF-SRS)
Scale from 0 (=none/ minimal) to 4 (= extreme)
Time frame: Week 4, 24, 36 and 52 compared to baseline
Cohort 2: Gloabl aesthetic improvement scale (GAIS) determined by the investigator
global aesthetic improvement rated as 'very much improved', 'much improved', 'improved', 'no change' or 'worse'
Time frame: Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 compared to baseline
Cohort 2: Gloabl aesthetic improvement scale (GAIS) determined by the subject
global aesthetic improvement rated as 'very much improved', 'much improved', 'improved', 'no change' or 'worse'
Time frame: Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 compared to baseline
Cohort 2: Subject satisfaction based on Face-Q questionnaire "Satisfaction with Outcome" Scale
Time frame: Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 compared to baseline
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Cohort 2: Response rate based on blinded photographic reviewer's assessment of Nasolabial Folds Severity Rating Scale (NLF-SRS)
Scale from 0 (=none/ minimal) to 4 (= extreme)
Time frame: Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 compared to baseline
Cohort 2: Response rate based on investigator's assessment of Nasolabial Folds Severity Rating Scale (NLF-SRS)
Scale from 0 (=none/ minimal) to 4 (= extreme)
Time frame: Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 compared to baseline
Cohort 2: Mean pain intensity score using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
11-point scale ranging from 0 (= no pain) to 10 (=worst pain imaginable)
Time frame: Immediately after administration and 15 minutes after treatment