The MAC-HAPLO-MUD trial is a randomized prospective phase III trial comparing HLA 10/10 matched unrelated donor and haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after myeloablative conditioning regimen in patients, age 15 years or older, with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) or Myeloproliferative Syndrome (SMP) or Myelodysplastic Syndromes (SMD) and requiring allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Primary endpoint is the 1-year progression free survival without acute grade II-IV GvHD and without moderate and severe chronic GvHD.
An unrelated adult donor who is HLA-matched to the recipient at the allele-level (at HLA-A, -B, -C, -DQB1 and -DRB1) is considered the best choice in the absence of an HLA-matched sibling for patients needing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT). However, using matched unrelated donors (MUD) is limited by (1) a prolonged time to identify and schedule donation for some MUD allowing some patients to relapse before transplantation can be performed, and (2) limited availability of fully HLA-MUD for the non-Caucasian population. Alternative donors are used for transplantation in patients without a fully-MUD including single HLA mismatched unrelated donor, unrelated umbilical cord blood and grafts from haploidentical related donors but are associated with higher non-relapse mortality and delayed immune reconstitution. A more recent strategy for haploidentical (haplo) related donor SCT (haplo-SCT) has improved dramatically outcomes using T-cell replete grafts with administration of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy). From retrospective studies, haplo-SCT with PTCy are associated with similar overall and progression-free survivals as with MUD stem cell transplantation (MUD-SCT), but with lower rates of toxicity and graft versus host disease (GvHD), and thus potentially better results than MUD-SCT after reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen. Haplo-SCT with PTCy is thus highly discussed nowadays motivating prospective trials to confirm the benefit of this procedure. In the setting of a myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimen in adults with high risk hematological malignancies, few retrospective non-controlled registry studies recently suggest that outcomes after haplo-SCT using PTCy approach might also be superior in terms of GVHD free survival to that after MUD stem cell transplantation (MUD-SCT). The investigators propose to address this question, in a randomized prospective phase III clinical trial comparing HLA 10/10 MUD and haplo-SCT after MAC regimen. The stem cell source will be bone marrow for haploidentical SCT and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) for HLA-matched unrelated transplantation. The primary endpoint is the 1-year progression free survival without acute grade II-IV GvHD and without moderate and severe chronic GvHD.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
344
The algorithm for selection of haploidentical donor has been defined by the french society for stem cell transplantation The stem cell source will be bone marrow for haploidentical transplantation.The bone marrow collection is carried out according to the practice of each centre with a minimal target dose of 3x108 TNC/kg.
HLA 10/10 matched unrelated donor myeloablative transplantation
Progression free survival, without acute grade II-IV GvHD and without moderate and severe chronic GvHD.
One year progression free survival, without acute grade II-IV GvHD and without moderate and severe chronic GvHD. -Relapse evaluation: For myeloid malignancies, the relapse will be defined by the reappearance of leukemic cells after SCT. For ALL, the relapse will be defined by: the reappearance of leukemic cells after SCT and/or an increase of at least 50 % of the smallest measure of any lymphnode considered abnormal in the pre-transplantation period for patients in partial response and in non-responders and/or the appearance of any new lesion in comparison with the pre-transplantation period evaluation. \- GvHD evaluation: Grading of acute GVHD will be performed according to the classification of Glusckberg. Grading of chronic GVHD will be performed according to the NIH classification.
Time frame: 12 months
Time interval between indication of stem cell transplantation (SCT) and transplant
Time frame: 24 months
Engraftment
Engraftment: at least 3 consecutive days with neutrophils \> 0.5 G/L, with platelets \> 20 G/L
Time frame: at 24 months
Numbers of neutrophils
Absolute numbers of neutrophils
Time frame: at 1 month
Numbers of platelets
Absolute numbers of platelets
Time frame: at 1 month
Numbers of neutrophils
Absolute numbers of neutrophils
Time frame: at 2 months
Numbers of platelets
Absolute numbers of platelets
Time frame: at 2 months
Numbers of neutrophils
Absolute numbers of neutrophils
Time frame: at 3 months
Numbers of platelets
Absolute numbers of platelets
Time frame: at 3 months
Numbers of neutrophils
Absolute numbers of neutrophils
Time frame: at 6 months
Numbers of platelets
Absolute numbers of platelets
Time frame: at 6 months
Numbers of neutrophils
Absolute numbers of neutrophils
Time frame: at 12 months
Numbers of platelets
Absolute numbers of platelets
Time frame: at 12 months
Numbers of neutrophils
Absolute numbers of neutrophils
Time frame: at 24 months
Numbers of platelets
Absolute numbers of platelets
Time frame: at 24 months
Use of growth factors
Use of growth factors for poor hematopoietic reconstitution
Time frame: at 12 months
Immune reconstitution
Immune reconstitution by analyzing T, B, Natural Killer (NK), regulatory T cell levels in the peripheral blood
Time frame: at 1 month post transplantation
Immune reconstitution
Immune reconstitution by analyzing T, B, NK, regulatory T cell levels in the peripheral blood
Time frame: at 3 months post transplantation
Immune reconstitution
Immune reconstitution by analyzing T, B, NK, regulatory T cell levels in the peripheral blood
Time frame: at 6 months post transplantation
Immune reconstitution
Immune reconstitution by analyzing T, B, NK, regulatory T cell levels in the peripheral blood
Time frame: at 12 months post transplantation
Immune reconstitution
Immune reconstitution by analyzing T, B, NK, regulatory T cell levels in the peripheral blood
Time frame: at 24 months post transplantation
Iron overload estimation
Time frame: at 1 month
Iron overload estimation
Time frame: at 3 months
Iron overload estimation
Time frame: at 6 months
Iron overload estimation
Time frame: at 12 months
Iron overload estimation
Time frame: at 24 months
Chimerism
Time frame: at 1 month
Chimerism
Time frame: at 3 months
Chimerism
Time frame: at 6 months
Chimerism
Time frame: at 12 months
Acute GvHD
Incidence of acute GvHD
Time frame: at 24 months
First line treatment
Time frame: 24 months
Response to steroids
Time frame: 24 months
Treatment courses for refractory aGVHD
Time frame: 24 months
Relapse
Incidence of relapse
Time frame: 24 months
Progression free survival
Time frame: 24 months
Severe infections (CTAE grade 3-4)
Time frame: 12 months
Cytomegalovirus (CMV)
Incidence of CMV
Time frame: 12 months
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)
Incidence of EBV reactivation
Time frame: 12 months
Veno-occlusive disease (VOD)
Incidence of veno-occlusive disease
Time frame: 3 months
Severity of veno-occlusive disease (VOD)
Severity of veno-occlusive disease. VOD severity will be assessed using new EBMT criteria (Mohty et al., 2016). EBMT criteria for grading VOD severity in adult patients are based on the level of bilirubin and its rate of change, liver function (transaminase), weight increase, renal function and the kinetic of their onset (Mohty et al., 2016). This grading system is divided into five categories as following: mild, moderate; severe, very severe; and death. Mohty M., Malard F., Abecassis M., Aerts E., Alaskar AS. et al. (2016). Revised diagnosis and severity criteria for sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease in adult patients: a new classification from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplantation 51,906-912.
Time frame: 3 months
Cardiac toxicities
Incidence of cardiac toxicities
Time frame: 12 months
Non-relapse mortality
Time frame: 12 months
Overall survival
Time between death and inclusion
Time frame: 24 months
Quality of life post transplantation: EORTC QLQ-C30- v3
Quality of life evaluated using questionnaire "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire" (EORTC QLQ-C30- v3). The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning. A high score for the global health status/ QoL represents a high QoL and a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems. EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual. Fayers PM et al. on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group. EORTC, 2001. ISBN: 2-9300.
Time frame: 1 week post-transplantation
Quality of life at 3 months: EORTC QLQ-C30- v3
Quality of life evaluated using questionnaire "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire" (EORTC QLQ-C30- v3). The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning. A high score for the global health status/ QoL represents a high QoL and a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems. EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual. Fayers PM et al. on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group. EORTC, 2001. ISBN: 2-9300.
Time frame: 3 months
Quality of life at 6 months: EORTC QLQ-C30- v3
Quality of life evaluated using questionnaire "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire" (EORTC QLQ-C30- v3). The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning. A high score for the global health status/ QoL represents a high QoL and a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems. EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual. Fayers PM et al. on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group. EORTC, 2001. ISBN: 2-9300.
Time frame: 6 months
Quality of life at 12 months: EORTC QLQ-C30- v3
Quality of life evaluated using questionnaire "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire" (EORTC QLQ-C30- v3). The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning. A high score for the global health status/ QoL represents a high QoL and a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems. EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual. Fayers PM et al. on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group. EORTC, 2001. ISBN: 2-9300.
Time frame: 12 months
Quality of life at 24 months: EORTC QLQ-C30- v3
Quality of life evaluated using questionnaire "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire" (EORTC QLQ-C30- v3). The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning. A high score for the global health status/ QoL represents a high QoL and a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems. EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual. Fayers PM et al. on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group. EORTC, 2001. ISBN: 2-9300.
Time frame: 24 months
Number of new days of hospitalization after the hospitalization for transplantation
Time frame: at 24 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.