Upper eyelid treatment has not been used with previously described methods of treatment of dry eye disease using intense pulsed light therapy because the upper lids disease was typically not as advanced as lower lid and because direct treatment of the upper lid was not felt to be necessary as each light pulse extended over the entire periorbita even when concentrated on the lower lid.
Dry eye disease is an under-diagnosed and growing problem. Intense pulsed light has been a proven method of improving the signs and symptoms of meibomian gland dysfunction including lid margin vascularity, meibum viscosity, OSDI mean score and tear break up. This study looks at the safety and effect of treatment of upper lids only to evaluate the safety and efficacy of direct upper lid treatment on the signs and symptoms of dry eye.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
19
Use of 6 mm SapphireCool light guide to treat upper lid margins from tragus to tragus including the nose
Toyos Clinic
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Non-invasive Tear Break up Time (TBUT)
average of 3 measurements (in seconds) using fluorescein dye and stopwatch to monitor first sign of tear film break up
Time frame: 2 weeks
Measure of Visual Analog Scale Pain Over Last 24 Hours
measure (in millimeters) of pain on scale of minimum of 0 mm(no pain)- maximum of 100mm (maximal pain and worse outcome)
Time frame: 24 hours
Ocular Discomfort Frequency Assessment on Visual Analog Scale
scale of minimum of 0 mm (no episodes)-maximum of 100 mm (constant painful episodes and worse outcome) frequency of dry eye pain episodes
Time frame: 24 hours
Measure of Visual Analog Scale Pain
measure of pain since last visit on scale of minimum of 0 mm (no pain)- maximum of 100 mm (maximal pain and worse outcome)
Time frame: 2 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.