The PIP Study - Pre- IVF Immune Profiling Study

Overview

Many IVF clinics offer testing for immune cells in the blood and endometrium as it has been suggested that abnormal levels of these cells can affect fertility or the chance of an IVF cycle working. However, routinely offering these tests remains highly controversial as the scientific evidence behind the tests is not of a high quality. The PIP Study aims to find out how a woman's blood and endometrial immune cells affect the likelihood of an IVF cycle working and whether or not they are different in women with subfertility and implantation failure. This feasibility study aims to find out if it is possible to enrol enough women into the research study. If this is successful, the investigators will then go on to recruit a larger group of women into the main PIP study to enable them to investigate the impact of immune profiling on IVF success in more detail.

Although there are examples of autoimmune associated pregnancy pathology, notably the anti-phospholipid syndrome (1), robust evidence of immune mediated pregnancy failure is limited. However for many years there have been persistent reports of a possible association between 'abnormal' levels of peripheral or endometrial immune cell populations (predominantly NK cells), altered cell function or cytokine production (by NK and T cells) and subfertility, recurrent failed implantation or recurrent miscarriage (2-5). Many fertility clinics offer testing for a variety of peripheral blood immune cell parameters (NK cell numbers, cytotoxicity assays, Tregs, cytokine assays, etc) or endometrial parameters (most commonly NK cell numbers). Furthermore, treatments including corticosteroids, immunoglobulin, intralipids, biologic agents (e.g.: anti-TNFα therapy) are commonly offered to treat 'abnormal' results. The testing and treatment of immune mediated subfertility and implantation failure remains highly controversial for a number of reasons: 1. To date there is little evidence that blood or endometrial immune cell numbers, activation status or function, are associated with either implantation failure or successful IVF treatment (6). 2. There is little evidence in the literature as to normal parameters of endometrial or blood immune cell populations in fertile women. Of note, a recent meta-analysis (6) of blood NK cells describes a total of 106 fertile controls and compares them to 249 women who were either subfertile or had recurrent implantation failure. This is the largest dataset of controls however the 6 included studies vary in how the cells were measured and therefore pooling these data is of limited value. Studies assessing endometrial NK cells comprised only 20 fertile women and 40 subfertile women. 3. The majority of studies compare a pathology (e.g.: Recurrent Implantation Failure (RIF)) with controls but do not have outcome data of the subsequent IVF cycles. 4. It is often argued that blood testing can be of no value as the immune cell populations in the endometrium are phenotypically and functionally different to those in the periphery (7). However the majority of clinical testing is done in blood. There are only a few small studies that compare endometrial and blood parameters in the same patients with no evidence to date that blood NK cells reflect the endometrial NK population. The evidence above describes the limited data on which routine clinical testing is performed. Added to which, there are no high quality Randomised Controlled Trials showing evidence of benefit for the treatments that are used. In this study the investigators propose to describe in detail normal endometrial and blood immune cell parameters as this has not previously been done in a large population In order to achieve this, women who are undergoing a first cycle or second cycle of IVF for male factor subfertility requiring Intracytoplasmic Sperm injection (ICSI) will be recruited. Those women who go on to have a live birth will be considered to be fertile controls (as their reason for IVF was a male factor and pregnancy was achieved at the first attempt). A sub-group of such participants will be used to describe the normal population (with standard deviations) and to use as a control group to compare to pathologies (RIF and subfertility). The investigators wish to recruit broadly to the study-250 women overall but they have not defined a recruitment target for each group so that they can, at the end of the feasibility study identify the proportions of the 250 women who fall into each subgroup. Depending on the findings the investigators may need to target specific groups in the main study. The purpose of the feasibility study is to determine the recruitment rate in the screened population for a larger fully powered study. The investigators will recruit all women under the age of 40 (at time of egg collection) from IVI clinics in the UK and the Wolfson Fertility Centre who are eligible and wish to recruit to the study. Within this population of recruits there will be three specific groups: 1. Women in a first or second cycle of IVF for male factor subfertility requiring ICSI. 2. Women with a history of RIF (using the definition described in (8)) 3. Any women with a history of at least 1 year of subfertility. Inclusion in the study will require women to undertake a single visit to have a blood sample and an endometrial biopsy during the mid-luteal phase of the cycle before IVF treatment. There are minimal risks (besides the small risk of bruising and discomfort) from blood tests. Endometrial biopsy (known clinically as an endometrial 'scratch') is a procedure that is commonly undertaken prior to IVF treatment, as there is evidence that a scratch increases the pregnancy rate in the subsequent IVF cycle (9). Endometrial biopsy causes some discomfort at the time of the procedure but has no significant risks to participants.