This trial was a multi-center, double-blind, randomized, parallel group, placebo-controlled, phase II study in adult hospitalized female patients with the confirmed diagnosis of pelvic adhesive disease in Study centres in Russia.
In order to evaluate efficacy and safety of Seroguard, solution for IP administration, a study design meeting the set objectives was selected: prospective, multi-center, double-blind, randomized, parallel group, placebo-controlled study. Given the fact that comparison with placebo is considered the best way to prove efficacy and safety of a drug and that currently there are no drugs with a similar mechanism of action at the pharmaceutical product market, a placebo-controlled, parallel group study design was selected. A randomized, parallel group study design was chosen in order to ensure minimization of a selection bias. Subjects were randomized into four groups (two groups of the test drug and two placebo groups corresponding to the two doses) to enable a comparison of Seroguard administration at two doses. A double-blind study design was selected in order to ensure minimization of an outcome evaluation bias.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
114
Number of Participants With Reduction of Adhesions Number by 3 or More
The number of adhesions according to the first MRI data was compared to the number according to the data of second MRI
Time frame: 30±4 days after surgical intervention
Change in Thickness of Pelvic Adhesions
The change from baseline was defined. It was evaluated by comparing baseline MRI data and repeated MRI data. Results were estimated according to scale from 0 to 3 where 0 - no adhesions, 1 - thin (filmy or filiform), 2 - marked, 3 - marked with an impaired passage through organs involved.
Time frame: 30±4 days after surgery
Number of Participants With Detection of Pelvic Organs Limited Mobility
The frequency was estimated based on transvaginal ultrasound results
Time frame: 30±4 days after surgery
Number of Participants With Detection of Hyperechoic Linear Lesions Post Surgery
The frequency was estimated based on transvaginal ultrasound results
Time frame: 30±4 days after surgery
Change in Number of Participants in Detecting Pelvic Organs Limited Mobility
Absolute change of count of participants was measured with detecting pelvic organs limited mobility from the baseline
Time frame: 30±4 days after surgery
Change Number of Participants in Detecting Hyperechoic Linear Lesions
Frequency of detecting after repeated transvaginal ultrasound results was compared to baseline indications (4 or more)
Time frame: 30±4 days after surgery
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Krai Government-Owned State Funded Healthcare Institution "Krai Clinical Hospital"
Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk Krai, Russia
State Educational Government-Financed Institution of Higher Professional Education "Krasnoyarsk State Medical University named after Prof. V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation at the clinical site Publicly Funded
Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk Krai, Russia
State Funded Healthcare Institution of Moscow of City Health Department "V.M. Buyanov Municipal Clinical Hospital"
Moscow, Moscow Oblast, Russia
Federal State Institution "V.I. Kulakov Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology" of the Ministry of Healthcare and Social Development of the Russian Federation.
Moscow, Moscow Oblast, Russia
State Educational Government-Financed Institution of Higher Professional Education "Kazan State Medical University" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian at the clinical site of Kazan Maternity Hospital No. 3 named after V.S. Gruzdev
Kazan', Tatarstan Republic, Russia
State Funded Health Care Institution "Bryansk Municipal Hospital No 1
Bryansk, The Bryansk Region, Russia
Federal State Educational Government-Financed Institution of Higher Education "Kemerovo State Medical University" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation at the clinical site of Kemerovo Oblast Publicly Funded Healthcare Institution "L.A.
Kemerovo, The Kemerovo Region, Russia
Federal State Funded Healthcare Institution "L.G. Sokolov Federal Biomedical Agency Clinical Hospital No 122".
Saint Petersburg, The Leningrad Region, Russia
Federal State Funded Scientific Institution "Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Saint Petersburg, The Leningrad Region, Russia
Moscow Oblast State Funded Healthcare Institution "Moscow Oblast Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology"
Moscow, The Moscow Region, Russia
...and 4 more locations
Number of Participants With Detection of no Ultrasound Signs of Pelvic Adhesive Disease Post Surgery
No limited mobility of pelvic organs and no hyperechoic linear lesions should be shown
Time frame: 30±4 days after surgery