Iron deficiency is prevalent in heart transplant recipients, and may be associated with reduced functional capacity. The IronIC trial is designed to assess the effect of intravenous iron isomaltoside on exercise capacity, muscle strength, cognition and quality of life in iron-deficient heart transplant recipients
Iron deficiency is prevalent in patients with heart failure. Iron deficiency is associated with a worse prognosis, and randomised controlled trials have shown that correction of iron deficiency with intravenous iron therapy improves functional capacity, quality of life, and 6-minute walk distance. Current guidelines therefore recommend intravenous iron substitution in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and iron deficiency. Intravenous iron is more effective, better tolerated, and improves quality of life to a greater extent than oral iron supplements. In the IRONOUT HF trial, in which 225 patients with systolic heart failure were randomised to oral iron supplement or placebo, there was no effect on oxygen uptake, 6-minute walk distance, or quality of life. The authors attributed the negative results to the minimal effect on iron stores, suggesting that oral iron does not adequately replenish iron stores in patients with heart failure. Cardiac allograft recipients resemble patients with heart failure in many respects. Prior to transplantation, and in some instances after heart transplantation, they have had overt heart failure. Moreover, due to the immunologic challenge posed by the allograft, and their susceptibility to infection due to immunosuppressive treatment, cardiac allograft recipients have low-grade inflammation. This low-grade inflammation makes it difficult to interpret iron stores, and results in dysregulated iron metabolism. There have been no studies to assess the effect of intravenous iron therapy in heart transplant recipients who have iron deficiency. There is reason to believe that a liberal definition of iron deficiency should be used in cardiac allograft recipients, and the investigators have elected to use the well-established definition used in patients with heart failure: serum ferritin \< 100 µg/l or ferritin between 100 and 300 µg/l in combination with a transferrin saturation \< 20 %. Because oral iron supplement is less effective then intravenous iron in general, and in patients with heart failure in particular, the investigators assume that oral iron supplement is inadequate in heart transplant recipients. the investigators have designed the IronIC trial to assess the effect of intravenous iron isomaltoside on exercise capacity, muscle strength, cognition and quality of life in iron-deficient heart transplant recipients.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
102
Intravenous infusion
Intravenous infusion
Oslo university Hospital, Rikshospitalet
Oslo, Norway
Peak Oxygen Consumption
The primary endpoint will be the baseline-adjusted between-group difference in peak oxygen consumption as measured on a treadmill exercise test
Time frame: 6 months after intervention
Iron Deficiency
The number of patients with absolute or functional iron deficiency
Time frame: 6 months after intervention
Muscle Strength
Baseline-adjusted muscle strength as measured by a hand-grip dynamometer
Time frame: 6 months after intervention
Health Related Quality of Life: SF-36, Physical Component Summary (PCS)
Baseline-adjusted quality of life as assessed with the 36-item short form survey (SF-36), which measures each of the following 8 health domains: 1= general health, 2= physical function, 3= role physical, 4= bodily pain, 5= vitality, 6= social function, 7= role emotional, 8= mental health. Total score for each domain are scaled 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores represented higher level of functioning. Two norm-based sum scores, the physical and the mental component summaries with a mean of 50±10, were generated from the eight scale scores using a T-score transformation. Higher scores represented higher level of functioning.
Time frame: 6 months after intervention
N-terminal Pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP)
The between-group difference in baseline-adjusted NT-proBNP
Time frame: 6 months after intervention
Cardiac Troponin T (TnT)
The between-group difference in baseline-adjusted TnT
Time frame: 6 months after intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Health Related Quality of Life: SF-36, Mental Component Summary (MCS)
Baseline-adjusted quality of life as assessed with the 36-item short form survey (SF-36), which measures each of the following 8 health domains: 1= general health, 2= physical function, 3= role physical, 4= bodily pain, 5= vitality, 6= social function, 7= role emotional, 8= mental health. Total score for each domain are scaled 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores represented higher level of functioning. Two norm-based sum scores, the physical and the mental component summaries with a mean of 50±10, were generated from the eight scale scores using a T-score transformation. Higher scores represented higher level of functioning.
Time frame: 6 months after intervention