In North America, children and adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis (IS) are rarely referred for a rehabilitation program whereas the European guidelines stated that scientific evidences concerning scoliosis specific physiotherapy exercises were strong enough to recommend the use of these exercises at an early stage. The objectives of this pilot study is to assess feasibility of conducting a larger randomized control trial (RCT) on the effect of global postural re-education (GPR) on scoliosis progression (Cobb angle) and posture, back pain and participation and to assess the equivalence of two groups of GPR interventions. A convenience sample of 60 adolescents with IS (Cobb angle 15º-50º, Risser sign ≤3) will be recruited at CHU Sainte-Justine. Participants will be randomly allocated to GPR-A (individual sessions once a week) or GPR-B (individual sessions once per two weeks alternately with class exercises once per two weeks) for 6 months. After 6 months, groups will be interchanged for another 6 months. Feasibility outcomes will be recruitment rate, consent rate, completion rate and adherence to treatment at 12 months. The primary outcome of the effect of GPR will be the Cobb angle. Secondary outcomes will be: posture, back pain and participation at 6 and 12 months. Statistical analyses: For feasibility, percentage of eligible patients recruited, percentage of recruited patients who completed the trial and adherence to treatment will be calculated. For the preliminary effects of GPR, linear mixed-models will be used to assess differences in groups' changes from baseline, to 6 and 12-month while adjusting for covariates (age, Risser, adherence). Separate analyses will be conducted for each outcome.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
20
CHU Sainte-Justine
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Change in Cobb angle
Change in the frontal radiologic measure of scoliosis: a decrease in Cobb angle by more than 5 degrees indicate improvement
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Posture: shoulder elevation
Clinical Photographic Postural Assessment Tool: The angle formed between a line drawn between the left and right coracoid process markers, and the horizontal: a decrease of this angle indicate improvement
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Posture: right waist angle
Clinical Photographic Postural Assessment Tool: The angle formed by lines drawn from the upper end of the waist to the center of the waist, and from the cent Clinical Photographic Postural Assessment Tool: The angle formed by lines drawn from the upper end of the waist to the center of the waist, and from the center of the waist to the lower end of the waist on the right side: more symmetry with the left side indicate improvement
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Posture: left waist angle
Clinical Photographic Postural Assessment Tool: The angle formed by lines drawn from the upper end of the waist to the center of the waist, and from the cent Clinical Photographic Postural Assessment Tool: The angle formed by lines drawn from the upper end of the waist to the center of the waist, and from the center of the waist to the lower end of the waist on the left side: more symmetry with the right side indicate improvement
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Posture: thoracic scoliosis
Clinical Photographic Postural Assessment Tool: The angle formed by lines drawn from the upper end-vertebra to the apex of the thoracic scoliosis curve and from the apex to the lower end-vertebra of the curve: decrease of this angle indicate improvement
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Posture: lumbar scoliosis
Clinical Photographic Postural Assessment Tool: The angle formed by lines drawn from the upper end-vertebra to the apex of the thoracolumbar or lumbar scoliosis curve, and from the apex to the lower end-vertebra of the curve: decrease of this angle indicate improvement
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Posture: frontal trunk list
Clinical Photographic Postural Assessment Tool: The horizontal distance between C7 and a vertical line drawn from S1: decrease of this measure in millimeter indicate improvement
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Posture: frontal pelvic tilt
Clinical Photographic Postural Assessment Tool: The angle formed between the line joining the two anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and the horizontal: decrease of this angle indicate improvement
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Posture: right sagittal pelvic tilt
Clinical Photographic Postural Assessment Tool: The angle formed between the horizontal and the line joining the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) and ASIS on the right side: an angle between 20 and 30 degrees indicate a normal value and a better symmetry between right and left side indicate improvement
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Posture: left sagittal pelvic tilt
Clinical Photographic Postural Assessment Tool: The angle formed between the horizontal and the line joining the PSIS and ASIS on the left side: an angle between 20 and 30 degrees indicate a normal value and a better symmetry between right and left side indicate improvement
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Posture: scapula asymmetry
Clinical Photographic Postural Assessment Tool: The angle formed by a line drawn from the left and right inferior angles of the scapula and the horizontal: decrease of this angle indicate improvement
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Change in back pain
Change in the intensity (score) of back pain on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale score (0 no pain to 10 very important pain), lower value indicate improvement.
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Change in score of The youth version of the Child & Adolescent Scale of Participation
Change in score of The youth version of the Child \& Adolescent Scale of Participation (CASP): The CASP questionnaire has 20 items x 4 levels from 1 (unable to participate) to 4 (age expected/full participation) with a maximum of 80 points. Higher value indicate improvement (better participation).
Time frame: 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.