This study evaluates effect of weight loss in a group of obese patients with gouty arthritis. The study is a randomised group trial where half the patients receive intensive weight loss in the form of meal replacement from Cambridge as well as supervision from a clinical dietician and the other half get usual care.
Background Gout is an increasingly common disorder characterised by elevated serum urate (SU) and by acute and chronic arthritis causing severe disability and pain. Long-term management of gout focuses on urate-lowering therapy (ULT), and keeping SU under its solubility threshold. When SU is kept under the threshold for solubility, the frequency of gout flares will decrease and the urate crystals dispositioned in the joints will dissolve. New therapeutic management of gout has in recent years emerged. However, despite the potential for effective treatment, gout management remains suboptimal. there is some physiological evidence, although sparse, that weight loss in patients with gout reduces both SU and number of gout flares. Despite the scarcity of data regarding the effects of weight loss in gout, international guidelines recommend dietary intervention and weight loss as a core management strategy in patients with concomitant gout and obesity The aim with the current study is to address whether or not there is a difference in success rate in weight reduction, SU levels, and possible side-effects between the 2 approaches in the "short-term", by comparing a weight loss group to an ongoing no-treatment (usual care) group. recruitment Participants will be recruited from the out-patient clinics at the Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital and the Department of Rheumatology, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Denmark, through advertisements in newspapers and on the website of the Parker Institute. Additionally, local general practitioners will be informed about the possibility to assign patients to the project. All participants will be pre-screened via telephone using a series of standard questions about eligibility according to criteria of inclusion and exclusion. This study aims at being as pragmatic and inclusive as possible with few exclusion criteria Interventions All the participants who sign informed consent will be randomly assigned to either 16 (8+8) weeks of low-energy diet (LED; 3.4 MJ/day; i.e., the Intensive Diet \[ID\] group) OR a corresponding 16-week conventional hypo-energetic, high protein diet (app. 5 MJ/day) defined as a control group (i.e., conventional diet \[CD\] group). Intensive Diet (ID) Group: The first phase of the study consists of an 8-week weight reduction programme where the participants initiate an LED diet-only, with 3.4 MJ/day (810 kcal per day) in a supervised dietary programme (products provided by The Cambridge Weight Plan). They will be given nutritional and dietetic instructions by an experienced dietitian in sessions of 1-2 h weekly. The second phase (ID Group) of the study (week 8-16), will consist of an 8 weeks' fixed energy diet programme using 5 MJ/day (1,200 kcal per day) incorporating two diet products daily. The principles of the diet will be in line with the current guidelines for healthy eating issued by the Danish National Board of Health, i.e. low-fat, low-sugar and high-fibre. Conventional Diet (CD) Group: The programme will consist of a presentation by the same dietitian as for the ID group, who will provide nutritional advice in a 2 h session at baseline (week 0), and in week 8. At these sessions the dietitian will recommend eating ordinary foods in amounts which will provide the patients with approximately 5 MJ/day (1,200 kcal per day). The follow-up meeting at week 16 will not influence the outcome. Thus, during the 16 week trial, the CD group will attend three sessions altogether with a total of approximately 4h of instruction.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
60
intensive weight loss diet, with Cambridge weightplan products, and visits to a dietician.
Department of Rheumatology, the Parker Institute, Frederiksberg and Bispebjerg Hospital
Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
Bodyweight
change in bodyweight (kg) from baseline to week 16 visit.
Time frame: 16 weeks
Serum urate levels.
change in serum urate (mg/dL) from baseline to week 16 visit.
Time frame: 16 weeks
Serum urate levels
proportion of participants maintaining serum urate levels \<6mg/dL at visit week 8 and week 16
Time frame: 16 weeks
Serum urate levels
percentage reduction in serum urate(%) at final visit (week 16)
Time frame: 16 weeks
Flare: the proportion of individuals with any gout flare in the FIRST 8 weeks following randomisation]
the proportion of individuals with any gout flare in the FIRST 8 weeks following randomisation
Time frame: 8 weeks
Flare:the proportion of individuals with any gout flare in the LAST 8 weeks following randomisation
the proportion of individuals with any gout flare in the LAST 8 weeks following randomisation
Time frame: 16 weeks
Flare:the number of gout flares during the trial period for each patient
the number of gout flares during the trial period for each patient
Time frame: 16 weeks
functional status - measured by the "Health Assessment Questionaire" (HAQ).
change in functional status (HAQ) from baseline to week 16. HAQ consists of 20 questions on disability. The score ranges from 0-3. 0 being without problems and 3 with severe disability. the total score is an average of all questions.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 16 weeks
pain from their gout - measured on a visual analoge scale (VAS)
change in pain from their gout (VAS) from baseline to week 16. Ranges from 0-100mm on a VAS. 0mm being no pain, 100mm being the worst possible pain.
Time frame: 16 weeks
patient global - measured on a visual analoge scale (VAS)
change in patient global (VAS) from baseline to week 16. Ranges from 0-100mm on a VAS. 0mm being best possible health. 100mm being the worst possible health.
Time frame: 16 weeks
fatigue - measured on a visual analoge scale(VAS)
change in fatigue (VAS) from baseline to week 16. Ranges from 0-100mm on a VAS. 0mm being no fatigue. 100mm being worst possible fatigue imagined by the patient.
Time frame: 16 weeks
swollen joint count (SJC)
chagne in swollen joint count (SJC) from baseline to week 16
Time frame: 16 weeks
tender joint count (TJC)
change in tender joint count (TJC) from baseline to week 16
Time frame: 16 weeks
tophi:change in number of tophi from baseline to week 16
change in number of tophi from baseline to week 16
Time frame: 16 weeks
SF-36
change in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36: MCS and PCS apply) from baseline to week 16. there is included 8 subscales which combine into two overall domains - a physical combined score (PCS) and a mental combined score (MCS). The scales ranges from 0- 100. where 0 is maximum disability and 100 is no disability.
Time frame: 16 weeks