This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted in Chinese women with hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer, plus an open-label, single-arm pharmacokinetic (PK) subset in postmenopausal Chinese women with HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer.
The study included three cohorts of subjects: a premenopausal cohort and a postmenopausal cohort, both randomized and double-blind, and an open-label, single-arm pharmacokinetic (PK) cohort of postmenopausal women. The premenopausal cohort assessed the efficacy and safety of treatment with a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI; letrozole or anastrozole) combined with goserelin and ribociclib, compared with NSAI plus goserelin and placebo. The postmenopausal cohort assessed the efficacy and safety of ribociclib plus letrozole versus placebo plus letrozole. The study consisted of three periods: screening, treatment, and follow-up. 1. Screening phase: The study began with a 28-day screening period during which potential participants were evaluated against inclusion and exclusion criteria before initiating treatment on Day 1. 2. Treatment phase: Eligible participants in the premenopausal and postmenopausal cohorts were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of two treatment arms, while participants in the PK cohort were not randomized. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, loss to follow-up, or study termination. Following a statistically significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit observed at the primary analysis and implementation of Protocol Amendment 5 (dated 18-Oct-2022), participants and investigators were unblinded. Participants still receiving placebo were offered the option to cross over to ribociclib, at the investigator's discretion and with participant consent. 3. Follow-up phase: * Safety follow-up: All participants were followed for safety for up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment, except in cases of death, loss to follow-up, or withdrawal of consent. * Efficacy follow-up: Tumor assessments were performed at baseline and every 8 weeks (±1 week) from randomization for the first 18 months, then every 12 weeks (±1 week) until 36 months, and thereafter as clinically indicated until progression. Participants who discontinued treatment for reasons other than disease progression continued tumor assessments according to the same schedule until progression, death, withdrawal of consent, or loss to follow-up. * Survival follow-up: Survival status was assessed every 12 weeks (±1 week) for all participants, regardless of treatment discontinuation reason, unless consent was withdrawn. The end of the study was defined as the earliest occurrence of one of the following: all participants had discontinued or died; a new clinical study offering ribociclib became available and all ongoing participants were eligible for transfer; or participants still benefiting from treatment could continue receiving it through an alternative setting.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
327
Film-coated tablets for oral use (200 mg x 3) from days 1 to 21 of each 28 day cycle.
Film-coated tablets for oral use (200 mg x 3) from days 1 to 21 of each 28 day cycle.
Letrozole: Tablets for oral use, 2.5mg daily (all days of every cycle without interruption). Anastrazole: Tablets for oral use, 1mg daily (all days of every cycle without interruption) For Premenopausal cohort, it is the investigators choice for NSAI based on patients past history. For postmenopausal and PK cohorts, all patients will be on Letrozole.
Novartis Investigative Site
Hefei, Anhui, China
Pre and Postmenopausal Cohorts: Progressive Free Survival (PFS) Based on Local Assessment by RECIST 1.1 Guideline
Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression or death from any cause. PFS was assessed by local investigators based on tumor evaluations using RECIST version 1.1 criteria. Patients who had not experienced progression or death by the analysis cut-off date of 25 April 2022 were censored at the date of their last adequate tumor assessment prior to that cut-off.
Time frame: After approximately 100 progression-free survival (PFS) events had been observed in each cohort, using data collected up to the analysis cut-off date of 25-Apr-2022, an average of 43 months.
PK Cohort: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Ribociclib and Its Metabolite LEQ803
Venous whole blood samples were collected for activity-based pharmacokinetic characterization. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was listed and summarized using descriptive statistics. Actual sampling times were taken into consideration for the pharmacokinetic analysis.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Days 1/15 (0/Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 24 hours post-dose). 1 cycle = 28 days.
PK Cohort: Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Ribociclib and Its Metabolite LEQ803
Venous whole blood samples were collected for activity-based pharmacokinetic characterization. The time to reach maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) was listed and summarized using descriptive statistics. Actual sampling times were taken into consideration for the pharmacokinetic analysis.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Days 1/15 (0/Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 24 hours post-dose). 1 cycle = 28 days.
PK Cohort: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours (AUC0-24h) of Ribociclib and Its Metabolite LEQ803
Venous whole blood samples were collected for activity-based pharmacokinetic characterization. The area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 hours post-dose (AUC₀-₂₄h) was listed and summarized using descriptive statistics. Actual sampling times were taken into consideration for the pharmacokinetic analysis.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Subcutaneous implant, 3.6mg on Day 1 of each 28 day cycle
Novartis Investigative Site
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Novartis Investigative Site
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, China
Novartis Investigative Site
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Novartis Investigative Site
Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
Novartis Investigative Site
Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
Novartis Investigative Site
Changsha, Hunan, China
Novartis Investigative Site
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
Novartis Investigative Site
Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
Novartis Investigative Site
Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
...and 14 more locations
Time frame: Cycle 1 Days 1/15 (0/Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 24 hours post-dose). 1 cycle = 28 days.
Pre and Postmenopausal Cohorts: Overall Survival (OS)
Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time from date of first dose to date of death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, then OS was censored at the latest date the participant was known to be alive (on or before the cut-off date).
Time frame: Up to approximately 80 months
Pre and Postmenopausal Cohorts: Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Overall Response Rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants with best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) by Investigator assessment as per RECIST 1.1 criteria: * CR = Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. * PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Time frame: Up to approximately 80 months
Pre and Postmenopausal Cohorts: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) was defined as the proportion of patients achieving a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST 1.1 criteria, or stable disease (SD) lasting at least 24 weeks, based on Investigator assessment using RECIST 1.1 criteria: * CR = Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. * PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. * SD = Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for Progressive Disease (PD).
Time frame: Up to approximately 80 months
Pre and Postmenopausal Cohorts: Time To Response (TTR)
Time to Response (TTR) was defined as the duration from randomization to the first documented evidence of either a complete response (CR) (the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions) or a partial response (PR) (at least a 30% reduction in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions from baseline) as assessed by the investigator.
Time frame: Up to approximately 80 months
Pre and Postmenopausal Cohorts: Duration of Response (DoR)
Duration of Response (DoR) only applies to participants whose Best Overall Response (BOR) was complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.1 based on tumor response data per local review. The start date is the date of first documented response of CR or PR (i.e. the start date of response, not the date when response was confirmed), and the end date is defined as the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause. Participants continuing without progression or death were censored at the date of their last adequate tumor assessment.
Time frame: Up to approximately 80 months
Pre and Postmenopausal Cohorts: Time to Definitive Deterioration of ECOG Performance Status From Baseline
Time to definitive deterioration in ECOG performance status was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date when ECOG performance status had definitively deteriorated by at least 1 category compared with baseline. Deterioration was considered definitive if there was no subsequent improvement in ECOG performance status back to the baseline category or above. The ECOG performance status scale assesses a patient's functional level, ranging from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead). Patients were censored if no definitive deterioration in ECOG performance status was observed before the first to occur between: (i) the analysis cut-off date, and (ii) the date when a new anti-neoplastic therapy was started. The censoring date was the date of the last performance status assessment prior to cut-off/start of new anti-neoplastic therapy. Time to definitive deterioration of ECOG performance status from baseline was estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 43 months