Urinary incontinence (UI) is a major public health issue affecting up to 25-50% of all women and has a detrimental impact on patient quality of life. Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is the most common form of urinary incontinence and is defined as the leakage of urine, which occurs during physical activity of exertion or on sneezing or coughing. It has been reported that the prevalence of SUI is 25 to 45% of the female population. If pelvic floor exercises are not effective, mid-urethral slings (MUS) are widely used as a first-line surgical treatment. Subjective and objective cure rates of 91% and 85% respectively have been reported for retropubic midurethral slings. Midurethral slings are commonly made of polypropylene (PP). Although the polypropylene products are effective and have relatively low rates of adverse events, the adverse events that do occur, like exposure and pain, have been related to the fact that a permanent synthetic mesh is implanted. Mesh-related complications are difficult to manage and may even involve partial or complete removal of the implant. Clinically, there is a need to investigate whether mid-urethral sling surgery can be performed with a non-permanent mesh made from a resorbable biomaterial, as an alternative for PP. Non-permanent meshes may be associated with fewer complications and better quality of life. However, before non-permanent and permanent mesh procedures can be compared, there is a need to first establish the feasibility of using a mesh in a mid-urethral sling procedure. The investigators hypothesize that a retropubic mid-urethral sling procedure to treat stress urinary incontinence, can be successfully performed using an implant made of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB).
The overall objective of this study is to determine the preliminary safety and efficacy of resorbable TephaFLEX sling implanted via a retropubic procedure to treat SUI. Prospective, observational single-center study with a follow-up of 24 months post-surgery. Up to 25 patients will be recruited at Groote Schuur Hospital Urogynecology Out-Patient Department. Eligible patients will receive a retropubic surgical producedure where a TephaFLEX sling, composed of the resorbable material P4HB, is placed. After the surgical procedure, follow-up visits are scheduled at 4-6 weeks, 3 months (+/- 2 weeks), 6 months (+/- 2 weeks), 12 months (+/- 1 month), and 24 months (+/- 1 month) post-procedure. TephaFLEX sling, manufactured by Tepha, Inc., will be implanted via a retropubic mid-urethral sling procedure for treatment of women with stress urinary incontinence. The product is supplied as a sterile, single-use device. One device will be utilized per patient. TephaFLEX sling, developed specifically for treatment of stress urinary incontinence, is a single layer, bioresorbable, mesh made from poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) monofilament fiber. The mesh is constructed as a 11mm x 60cm tape with an open pore structure, and is enclosed in a polyethylene sleeve to ease insertion. The mesh was designed specifically to provide strength over the three-month critical wound healing period in soft tissue repair and reinforcement, and to encourage the proliferation of healthy tissue at the repair site. The product undergoes a gradual loss of strength after implantation and is essentially resorbed by 18 - 24 months.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
25
The sling is made from P4HB material. It is placed in a similar technique to standard retropubic sling procedures, but will resorb over 18-24 months post surgery.
Groote Schuur Academic Hospital
Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
RECRUITINGDevice safety will be established by measuring the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events.
The retropubic mid-urethral sling procedure using UroFLEX sling is considered to be safe at 6 months after implantation if the number of serious adverse events comply with safety standards as defined by the safety criteria outlined below and analyzed using sequential analysis. The device will be considered safe at A) a maximum of 3 of the first 5 patients experience a device or procedure-related SAE (60%); B) a maximum of 5 of the first 10 patients experience a device or procedure-related SAE (50%); C) a maximum of 7 of the first 20 patients experience a device or procedure-related SAE (35%); D) a maximum of 8 of the first 25 patients experience a device or procedure-related SAE (32%).
Time frame: 2 years
Objective cure measurement using Cough Stress Test
Preliminary effectiveness will be assessed by measuring the number of patients that exhibit objective cure based on Cough Stress Test
Time frame: Measured at enrolment, 4-6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post procedure (2 years total)
Subjective cure with PGI-I questionnaire Patient Global Impression of Improvement
Number of patients that exhibit subjective cure based on PGI-I questionnaire.
Time frame: Administered at 4-6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post procedure (2 years total)
Subjective cure with Sandvik scores (Incontinence severity index)
Number of patients showing subjective cure on Sandvik scores questionnaire
Time frame: Administered at 4-6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post procedure (2 years in total)
Subjective cure with PISQ-IR- Sexual Function for Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Urinary Incontinence and / or Fecal Incontinence questionnaire
Number of patients showing subjective cure using the PISQ-IR questionairre as measurement
Time frame: Administered at 4-6 weeks, 3, 6,12,24 months post procedure (2 years in total)
Subjective cure with Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6)
Number of patients showing subjective cure using the UDI-6
Time frame: Administered at 4-6 weeks, 3,6,12 and 24 months post procedure ( 2 years in total)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.