Screening for Asymptomatic Coronary Artery Disease in Kidney Transplant Candidates

N/AActive Not RecruitingNCT03674307

University of British Columbia3,306 enrolled

Overview

The Canadian Australasian Randomized Trial of Screening Kidney Transplant Candidates for Coronary Artery Disease (CARSK) will test the hypothesis that eliminating the regular use of non-invasive screening tests for CAD AFTER waitlist activation is not inferior to regular (i.e., annual) screening for CAD during wait-listing for the prevention of Major Adverse Cardiac Events. Secondary analyses will assess the impact of screening on the rate of transplantation, and the relative cost-effectiveness of screening.

Cardiovascular disease is the commonest cause of death while on the kidney transplant waiting list and after transplantation. Current standard care involves screening for coronary artery disease prior to waitlist entry, then every 1-2 years, according to perceived risk, until transplanted. The aim of screening is two-fold. Firstly to identify patients with asymptomatic coronary disease to enable either correction, by bypass surgery or angioplasty, or removal of the patient from the list, with the ultimate aim of preventing premature cardiovascular mortality at the time of, or soon after kidney transplantation. Secondly, from a societal perspective, to prevent mis-direction of scarce donor organs into recipients who experience early mortality. This current screening strategy is not evidence based, has substantial known and potential harms, and is very costly. Two major issues of uncertainty require addressing in sequence: (1) whether to periodically screen asymptomatic wait-listed patients for occult coronary artery disease; and (2) whether to revascularise coronary stenoses in asymptomatic patients prior to transplantation. The CARSK study seeks to address the first of these 2 issues. CARSK aims to 1. Test the hypothesis that after screening for wait list entry, no further screening for coronary artery disease (CAD) is non-inferior to the current standard care which is screening all asymptomatic wait-listed patients for CAD at regular intervals. 2. Compare the benefits and costs of not screening versus regular CAD screening from a health system perspective.

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

SCREENING

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: 1. adults aged 18 years of age or older 2. Dialysis-dependent kidney failure and currently being assessed for OR active on the kidney transplant waiting list 3. expected to require further screening for CAD prior to transplantation (by current standard of care); 4. able to give consent; 5. anticipated to undergo transplantation more than 12 months from date of enrolment Exclusion Criteria: 1. patients with signs or symptoms suggestive of uncontrolled cardiac disease such as unstable coronary syndromes, decompensated heart failure, uncontrolled arrhythmia, and severe valvular heart disease; 2. patients who "on-hold" for transplantation due to a medical problem; 3. patients with other solid organ transplants; 4. multi-organ transplant candidates (e.g. kidney-pancreas transplant candidates); 5. patients with planned living donor transplant; 6. patients unable to give consent.

Locations (22)

University of Arizona

Tucson, Arizona, United States

The George Washington University

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

University of Alberta

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

University of British Columbia

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Dalhousie University

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

St. Joseph's Healthcare

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Kingston Health Science Centre

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

London Health Science Centre

London, Ontario, Canada

The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

University Health Network

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

...and 12 more locations

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

MACE

Primary efficacy: major adverse cardiac event (MACE), defined as any of the following: cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, emergency revascularisation, hospitalisation with unstable angina. The outcome will be assessed by: 1. Notification to the transplant coordinators when patients are admitted in hospital (this is the usual standard of care in waitlisted patients). 2. The trial coordinator will gather electronic medical records, letters, procedure notes, and will fill in the relevant case record form on the REDCap database (managed by Sydney local health district). All data are encrypted and stored on servers at SLHD, where it is backed up. 3. Patients will be followed up 6-monthly (alternating by phone and clinic visits) where trial coordinators will discuss any hospitalisation with the patients.

Time frame: The investigators will analyse time to first MACE event for the duration of the trial (60 months), depending on patient's date of transplant. Follow-up will be 12 months posttransplant. Maximum follow-up is 72 months.