Forced cadence cycling (FCC) in which individuals with Parkinson's Disease (PD) pedal with external augmentation at 80-90 revolutions per minute (rpm) has demonstrated significant motor improvement in prior clinical trials. These studies required either a tandem bicycle with second rider or an expensive motorized bicycle, making this therapy inaccessible to most patients. In this pragmatic open-label before and after pilot study investigators examine implementation and effectiveness of (RCC) without tandem or motor augmentation and in a community-based setting. Approximately 30 participants will be recruited to participate in 24 one-hour rapid-cadence spin classes in YMCAs over 8 weeks. Primary outcomes will examine implementation of the intervention and secondary outcomes will examine effectiveness against a historical comparison group.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
24
Individuals with Parkinson's Disease will participate in 60 minute spin-classes during which they will follow the Pedaling for Parkinson's(TM) Foundation recommended protocol to achieve a cadence of 80-90 during the 40 minute main set.
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Percentage of individuals who complete at least 80% of offered cycling sessions [Tolerability]
Investigators will consider those who do not withdraw from the study, are not lost to follow up, and complete at least 80% of the cycling sessions to demonstrate tolerability of the study.
Time frame: assessed at conclusion of the 8 week intervention
Proportion of subjects reporting an adverse event during class [Safety]
Safety will be reported descriptively and include the proportion of subjects reporting any adverse event.
Time frame: assessed at each class by study staff and weekly by PI for duration of 8 week intervention
Modified Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-section III Motor
The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) section III measures severity of motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease with scores ranging from 0 to 199 with higher scores indicating more severe motor symptoms. This study utilizes a modified version of the UPDRS without rigidity which will be recorded on video and rated remotely by a movement disorder neurologist blinded to intervention status of the participant. This modified version has been shown to be reliable and valid, both at cross-sectional time points and longitudinally (Abdolahi, 2013).
Time frame: Assessed within two weeks prior to start of intervention and within one week after completion of intervention
Timed Up and Go
The Timed Up and Go test is measured in seconds with a range of 5-25 seconds (longer is worse)
Time frame: Assessed within two weeks prior to start of intervention and within one week after completion of intervention
Trail Making Test A& B
This cognitive test is measured in seconds with a range (part B) of 60-240 seconds (longer is worse).
Time frame: Assessed within two weeks prior to start of intervention and within one week after completion of intervention
PROMIS sf v1.0 Global Health
A 10-item patient reported outcomes scale measuring five domains (physical function, fatigue, pain, emotional distress, social health) and general health perceptions that cut across domains. Scores can range from 0-100 where higher is better.
Time frame: Assessed within two weeks prior to start of intervention and within one week after completion of intervention
Assessment of Intelligibility of Dysarthria (AIDS)
The Assessment of Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech is a tool for quantifying single-word intelligibility, sentence intelligibility, and speaking rate. The outcome is measured as the percent of words that are intelligible, with higher scores being better.
Time frame: Assessed within two weeks prior to start of intervention and within one week after completion of intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.