Feasibility of Endosphenoidal Coil Placement for Imaging of the Sella During Transsphenoidal Surgery

Tumors of the pituitary gland comprise up to 20% of all brain tumors. The central location and the small size of the pituitary gland make the management of tumors particularly challenging. Transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) to resect pituitary tumors is highly successful at achieving a complete cure for functional pituitary adenomas. It is most successful when such adenomas can be localized by preoperative MRI of the pituitary. However, in some instances, small functional tumors cannot be visualized. In the case of Cushing s disease (CD), such non-visualization may be as high as 50%. The success of transsphenoidal surgery is substantially reduced in patients with negative MRI, as some of the adenomas that cause CD are so small that they are difficult to find during surgical exploration of the pituitary. Surgical success is also diminished when tumors invade the walls of the cavernous sinus. MRI of the pituitary lacks imaging resolution to detect such invasion, so the surgeon cannot perform a complete resection with surgery based on the preoperative MRI. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is the primary constraint on achieving high-quality high-resolution MRI images. SNR can be improved by longer scan times or by increasing the field strength of the MRI magnet. SNR is proportional to the square of imaging time. However, long imaging times are not clinically feasible. SNR is linearly proportional to field strength. However, replacing MRI magnets is cost- prohibitive. Another strong determinant of SNR is the proximity of the MRI receiver coil to the tissue being imaged. Placement of a coil in close proximity to the structure of interest dramatically increases SNR, often as much as 10-fold. Clinically this is routinely put into practice for superficial body parts, such as the temporomandibular joints, in which small coils are placed directly over the joints to achieve rapid high-resolution imaging. For deep structures, the use of superficial coils is of no benefit. This has led to the development of endocavitary coils, such as the endorectal coil used to image the prostate gland. Such coils are now in routine clinical use here at the NIH and elsewhere. During routine TSS, the surgical approach to the pituitary gland provides a route for the placement of imaging tools, such as handheld ultrasound and Doppler probes in close proximity to the gland. Extending this model to MRI imaging, we realized that an endocavitary surface coil within the sphenoid sinus would allow for a marked improvement in SNR for imaging the sella. To this end, we have developed an endosphenoidal coil (ESC), demonstrated its MRI safety, and performed preliminary studies in cadaver heads to determine that the ESC can be placed through the transsphenoidal approach. The placement of ESC needs no modification in the surgical TSS approach to the pituitary gland. The goal of this protocol is to examine the safety and feasibility of ESC placement and imaging during TSS. Objective To evaluate the feasibility and safety of using ESC during TSS. Study Population The study population will be up to 70 adult subjects with pituitary tumors that require TSS. Enrollment will be completed once 50 subjects have received the study procedure. The requested accrual ceiling of 70 subjects accounts for screening failures and drop-outs who do not receive the study procedure. Design This is a pilot study of 50 subjects requiring TSS for pituitary lesions. The subjects will undergo standard TSS resection of a pituitary adenoma in the intra-operative MR suite. Following the standard surgical approach, the ESC will be placed into the sphenoid sinus while the bone of the sellar floor is still intact. Routine clinical pituitary imaging with and without intravenous contrast will be performed for comparison with standard pituitary imaging. Additional higher-resolution sequences will be performed as time allows. Following imaging, standard surgical resection will be performed. The surgeon will not view scans arising from the research procedure, and therefore intraoperative clinical decision-making will not be influenced by the results of the research imaging. Changes in study design since inception. This trial was initiated in 2019. For the initial period, the outcome measures were listed as such: Primary Outcome Measure: The primary outcome of this study is the feasibility of using ESC as a clinical tool during transsphenoidal surgery. Feasibility will be assessed by the time added to a standard TSS procedure (measured from the time the TSS exposure is completed to the time to return to the operating position for completion of surgery). Safety Outcome Measure: We will evaluate the safety of the ESC as a surgical adjunct tool. We will evaluate whether the use of ESC causes local trauma, bleeding, burns or other unanticipated safety issues during TSS. Exploratory Outcome Measures: Clinical utility of these images will be evaluated by comparing SNR and contrast to noise ratio (CNR) measurements obtained with the ESC to preoperative standard of care images. By the July 2022, 10 participants had enrolled and completed the study. Based on the initial experience, the study outcomes were re-enumerated as below in December 2022. Of note, there were no changes in the objectives of the clinical trial - feasibility, safety and exploratory objectives remain unchanged. In June 2023, the upper age limit was changed to 85 years from 65 years of age. Outcome Measures: Primary Outcome Measure Preliminary analysis of the data generated so far revealed that the ESC is well-designed to fit within the surgical workflow. However, the utility of ESC imaging was limited within the parameters of the standard sequences. Depending on the specific clinical indication for TSS, we found that the ESC could have differing roles as a surgical adjunct. For the current amended trial, the feasibility of ESC will be evaluated as follows: 1. For microadenomas (pituitary adenomas smaller than 10 mm in diameter), the ability of ESC to confirm the location and size of adenomas. 2. For macroadenomas (pituitary adenomas larger than 10 mm in diameter), the ability of ESC to detect invasion of the cavernous sinus and/or parasellar structures (structures surrounding the pituitary gland). 3. For MRI-negative cases, the ability to detect adenomas. Safety Outcome Measure We will evaluate the safety of the ESC as a surgical adjunct tool. We will evaluate whether the use of ESC causes local trauma, bleeding, burns or other unanticipated safety issues during TSS. Exploratory Outcome Measures Clinical utility of these images will be evaluated by comparing SNR and contrast to noise ratio (CNR) measurements obtained with the ESC to preoperative standard of care images. 1. Pituitary SNR with ESC MRI versus pre-operative standard of care images. 2. Pituitary to tumor Contrast to Noise Ratio (CNR) with ESC MRI versus pre-operative standard of care images.