Globally, an estimated 257 million individuals have chronic hepatitis B-virus infection (CHB). In the absence of treatment 15-40% of these will progress to liver cirrhosis and/or hepatocellular carcinoma. Oral antiviral treatment suppresses the virus and improves prognosis, but less than 0.5% per year achieve a "functional cure" (i.e. HBsAg loss). One remaining controversy, therefore, is whether antiviral treatment must continue life-long. Observational studies have assessed stopping antiviral treatment after years of viral suppression; however, HBsAg loss has rarely been seen. But interestingly, a few small trials that chose watchful waiting instead of re-initiation of treatment when reactivation occurred, achieved 40% HBsAg loss during 6 years follow-up. The present proposal is a randomized controlled trial that will assess the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of treatment discontinuation - and delayed restart - in HBeAg negative CHB. The study is sufficiently powered to address the hypotheses, and a pilot study that demonstrates feasibility has been performed. Patients will be enrolled at 12 Norwegian hospitals, in addition to our collaborating institution in Ethiopia - the largest CHB treatment center in sub-Saharan Africa. If the study shows that discontinuation is safe and effective, it will directly impact both national and international treatment guidelines. Main objective: -To study whether stopping nucleoside analogue (NA) therapy - and delaying re-start - can trigger an immune response and set off a functional cure (viz HBsAg loss) Secondary objectives: * Assess whether stopping NA therapy - and delaying re-start - leads to a higher chance of HBsAg loss * Assess the safety of stopping NA therapy - and delaying re-start - in terms of hepatic decompensation, fibrosis progression, and/or adverse events * Study whether stopping NA therapy - and delaying re-start - leads to a higher chance of sustained off-therapy immune control (low viral load and normal ALT) * Assess the quality of life and cost-effectiveness of stopping NA therapy - and delaying re-start * Identify predictors of HBsAg loss
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
127
The active intervention is to stop antiviral therapy, and delay re-start in the high-threshold group.
Hvidovre Hospital
Copenhagen, Denmark
St Paul Hospital Millennium Medical College
Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Ålesund Hospital
Ålesund, Norway
Bodø Hospital
Bodø, Norway
Drammen Hospital
Drammen, Norway
Akershus University Hospital
Lørenskog, Norway
Oslo University Hospital
Oslo, Norway
Bærum Hospital
Sandvika, Norway
Stavanger University Hospital
Stavanger, Norway
Tønsberg Hospital
Tønsberg, Norway
...and 1 more locations
HBsAg loss
Undetectable HBsAg measured by a standard assay
Time frame: Within 3 years after stopping therapy
Time to HBsAg loss
Time from randomization to undetectable HBsAg
Time frame: Within 3 years after stopping therapy
Time to re-start of antiviral therapy
Time from randomization to re-start of therapy according to the specified criteria
Time frame: Within 3 years after stopping therapy
Severe unintended medical events
Liver failure or other liver-related grade 4/5 SAEs
Time frame: Within 3 years after stopping therapy
Immune control
Sustained off-therapy response viz HBV DNA \<2000 IU/ml and ALT \<40 U/L
Time frame: Within 3 years after stopping therapy
Changes in health-related quality of life
Changes in the EuroQol standardized measure of health status (EQ-5D-5L) score. The summary index (from 0 to 1) as described by the manufacturer (euroqol.org) will be employed.
Time frame: Within 3 years after stopping therapy
Liver fibrosis evolution
Changes in transient elastography from baseline
Time frame: Within 3 years after stopping therapy
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.