The purpose of this study was to evaluate visual and refractive outcomes with the use of the HARMONI™ Modular Intraocular Lens (HMIOL) System implantation, assembly, and optic exchange in subjects undergoing cataract surgery.
All subjects were implanted with the HARMONI™ Modular Intraocular Lens (HMIOL) System in the right eye, left eye, or both eyes based on the best interest of the subject and the clinical judgment the Investigator (Day 0, primary implantation) (Cohort 1). At Month 1 post primary implantation, subjects were given the option to undergo an optic exchange procedure. Subjects who underwent the optic exchange (Cohort 2) (Day 0, optic exchange) were followed for an additional month. Subjects who did not undergo an optic exchange were exited from the study, except at 1 site, which followed subjects up to Month 12. Alcon Research, LLC, acquired ClarVista Medical in 2017. This study was designed and conducted by ClarVista Medical, Inc. The study results were collected, analyzed, and provided by ClarVista Medical, Inc. to Alcon Research, LLC.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
150
Two-component system consisting of a base and a separate optic that allows for an intraoperative exchange of the optic only without direct manipulation of the capsular bag.
Removal of one optic and replacement with another for the purpose of improving refractive outcomes
Percentage of Eyes With Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) by Visit - Cohort 1
Visual acuity of the eye was tested while reading charts at 20-foot equivalent distance from the participant with an optical infinity adjustment of +0.25 diopter (D). UCDVA was recorded in Snellen, with 20/20 considered to be 'normal' vision. A visual acuity of 20/40 means the participant is able to read a certain size letter 20 feet away that a person with 'normal' vision would be able to read from 40 feet away. A larger denominator, therefore, indicates a lower visual acuity. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Time frame: Day 1 post primary implantation, Week 1 post primary implantation, Month 1 post primary implantation, Month 3 post primary implantation, Month 6 post primary implantation, Month 12 post primary implantation
Percentage of Eyes With Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) by Visit - Cohort 2
Visual acuity of the eye was tested while reading charts at 20-foot equivalent distance from the participant with an optical infinity adjustment of +0.25 diopter (D). UCDVA was recorded in Snellen, with 20/20 considered to be 'normal' vision. A visual acuity of 20/40 means the participant is able to read a certain size letter 20 feet away that a person with 'normal' vision would be able to read from 40 feet away. A larger denominator, therefore, indicates a lower visual acuity. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned. The optic exchange occurred 1 month following primary implantation with HMIOL.
Time frame: Day 0 pre optic exchange, Day 1 post optic exchange, Week 1 post optic exchange, Month 1 post optic exchange
Percentage of Eyes With Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) by Visit - Cohort 1
Visual acuity of the eye was tested while reading charts at 20-foot equivalent distance from the participant with subject manifest refraction in place. BCDVA was recorded in Snellen, with 20/20 considered to be 'normal' vision. A visual acuity of 20/40 means the participant is able to read a certain size letter 20 feet away that a person with 'normal' vision would be able to read from 40 feet away. A larger denominator, therefore, indicates a lower visual acuity. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Time frame: Baseline (Day -90 to Day 0 preoperative), Week 1 post primary implantation, Month 1 post primary implantation, Month 3 post primary implantation, Month 6 post primary implantation, Month 12 post primary implantation
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Percentage of Eyes With Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) by Visit - Cohort 2
Visual acuity of the eye was tested while reading charts at 20-foot equivalent distance from the participant with subject manifest refraction in place. BCDVA was recorded in Snellen, with 20/20 considered to be 'normal' vision. A visual acuity of 20/40 means the participant is able to read a certain size letter 20 feet away that a person with 'normal' vision would be able to read from 40 feet away. A larger denominator, therefore, indicates a lower visual acuity. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0 pre optic exchange), Week 1 post optic exchange, Month 1 post optic exchange
Mean Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) by Visit - Cohort 1
A manifest refraction (manual vision test) was conducted using letter charts and a phoropter. The subject was manually refracted to his/her best correction. The manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) was measured in diopters (D) and calculated as follows: sphere + 1/2 cylinder. A less negative value indicates a more accurate IOL power calculation. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Time frame: Baseline (Day -90 to Day 0 preoperative), Week 1 post primary implantation, Month 1 post primary implantation, Month 3 post primary implantation, Month 6 post primary implantation, Month 12 post primary implantation
Mean Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) by Visit - Cohort 2
A manifest refraction (manual vision test) was conducted using letter charts and a phoropter. The subject was manually refracted to his/her best correction. The manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) was measured in diopters (D) and calculated as follows: sphere + 1/2 cylinder. A less negative value indicates a more accurate IOL power calculation. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0 pre optic exchange), Week 1 post optic exchange, Month 1 post optic exchange
Number of Surgeon Responses to Primary Surgery Question: How Would You Rate the Surgical Difficulty of the Base Implantation? - All HMIOL Cohort
The surgeon's response was collected on a study-specific questionnaire after each surgery. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Time frame: Day 0 primary implantation
Number of Surgeon Responses to Primary Surgery Question: How Would You Rate the Surgical Difficulty of the Optic Implantation and Assembly? - All HMIOL Cohort
The surgeon's response was collected on a study-specific questionnaire after each surgery. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Time frame: Day 0 primary implantation
Number of Surgeon Responses to Optic Exchange Surgery Question: How Would You Rate the Surgical Difficulty of the Optic Implantation and Assembly (Exchange)? - Cohort 2
The surgeon's response was collected on a study-specific questionnaire after each surgery. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Time frame: Day 0 post-exchange
Number of Surgeon Responses to Optic Exchange Surgery Question: How Would You Rate the Surgical Difficulty of the Optic Disassembly? - Cohort 2
The surgeon's response was collected on a study-specific questionnaire after each surgery. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Time frame: Day 0 post-exchange
Number of Surgeon Responses to Optic Exchange Surgery Question: How Would You Rate the Surgical Difficulty of the Optic Explantation? - Cohort 2
The surgeon's response was collected on a study-specific questionnaire after each surgery. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Time frame: Day 0 post-exchange
Number of Secondary Surgical Interventions (SSI) (Other Than Optic Exchange)
A secondary surgical intervention (SSI) was defined as a surgical procedure that occurred after primary implantation and was conducted for the purpose of resolving residual refractive error (RRE) and optimizing visual outcomes, as determined by the investigator. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Time frame: Cohort 1: Up to one month post primary implantation, with one site followed up to 12 months. Cohort 2: Up to one month post exchange, for a total of up to 2 months.
Number of Device Deficiencies
A device deficiency was defined as a failure of the device to meet its performance specifications or expectations, or otherwise not perform as intended. This could include either a malfunction or damage to the device or any part thereof, regardless of the source of malfunction or damage, including user error, and regardless of the presence of injury (or lack thereof) to subject, user, or bystander. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was planned.
Time frame: Cohort 1: Up to one month post primary implantation, with one site followed up to 12 months. Cohort 2: Up to one month post exchange, for a total of up to 2 months.