After stroke, patients often experience motor deficits that interrupt normal lower extremity movement and gait function. Recent developments in neuroimaging have focus on the reasons why some patients recover well while some do poorly. However, there is still no consensus on the exact mechanisms involved in regaining the functions after rehabilitation. Application of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to facilitate neural plasticity during stroke treatment has recently gained considerable attention. The possible mechanism through which rTMS acts is based on the interhemispheric competition (IHC) model, which explains that patients with stroke experience alterations in cortical excitability and exhibit abnormally high interhemispheric inhibition from the unaffected hemisphere to the affected hemisphere. The visual feedback training can improve postural control and enhance motor performance. Several rTMS studies have evaluated the lower extremity dysfunction following stroke, but few studies have explored the efficacy of applying rTMS on the lower extremities. We expect the study can help us to further exploration of the change of clinical function and cortical excitability following rTMS and visual feedback training in subjects with stroke. In addition, the results of this project will be provided for further rehabilitation programs in people with stroke.
Objective: To investigate the effects of combining rTMS with visual feedback training to improve movements in the paretic lower limb and gait performance. Methods: Thirty patients with monohemispheric after ischemic stroke will recruited and randomized into 3 groups. The group 1 received a 10-minute rTMS intervention then a 30-minute visual feedback training. The group 2 received a 10-minute sham rTMS intervention then a 30-minute visual feedback training. The group 3 received a 10-minute sham rTMS intervention then a 30-minute traditional rehabilitation training. All subjects received treatments 3 times a week for 4 weeks. The performance was assessed by a blinded assessor for two times (baseline and after 4 weeks). The outcome measures included Motor evoked potential (MEP), Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Lower Limb section(FMA-LE),Motor Assessment Score(MAS), Berg Balance Test (BBS),Time Up and Go (TUG), and Modified Barthel Index for ADL ability. Collected data will be analyzed with ANOVA test by SPSS version 20.0, and alpha level was set at 0.05. The hypothesis is combining rTMS with visual feedback training has positive effects on lower limb and gait performance among patients with stroke.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
30
The EMG measured the MEPs of the anterior tibialis in response to the TMS delivered using a Magstim Rapid2 stimulator (Magstim Co, Ltd, Carmarthenshire, Wales, UK) with a 70-mm figure-8 coil (maximum power, 2.2 T) over the contralateral M1. The intensity was initially set at 100% of the machine output (MO) to determine the optimal stimulation site (hotspot). The hotspot was marked on the scalp with oil ink and recorded as x, y, in centimeters from the vertex (cz). The participants received real rTMS or sham rTMS, respectively (1 Hz, 10 min), which was before a 30-minute visual feedback training and/or traditional rehabilitation training.
Game-based visual feedback training system and software.The system was designed to enable the subjects to perform ankle movements in multiple axes.
30 min traditional rehabilitation. The traditional rehabilitation programs included balance training, postural training, muscle strengthening, ambulation training and etc..
Taipei Medical University Hospital
Taipei, Taiwan
Change of Motor evoked potential
Measurement of motor evoked potential of anterior tibialis
Time frame: Change from baseline to 4 weeks
Chang of Motor Assessment Score
Lower Limb motor function
Time frame: Change from baseline to 4 weeks
Chang of Berg Balance Test
standing balance
Time frame: Change from baseline to 4 weeks
Chang of Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Lower Limb section
Lower Limb section
Time frame: Change from baseline to 4 weeks
Chang of Modified barthel index
Activity of daily live ability
Time frame: Change from baseline to 4 weeks
Chang of Time Up and Go
functional ambulation
Time frame: Change from baseline to 4 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.