Patient perception of pain on periodontal probing using a controlled-force, electronic probe was not significantly affected by the use of a modified (ball-end) probe tip design except for in the maxilla, where a standard straight probe tip appeared to be more comfortable for patients.
Recordings of periodontal probing pocket depth (PPD) and probing attachment level (PAL) are utilized in diagnosis of periodontal disease and monitoring of disease progression. Manual probing presents reproducibility and accuracy issues based on features such as probe tip design, force applied by the operator and inflammatory status of the periodontal tissues. Evidence from the literature suggests that some patients may determine periodontal probing to be a painful experience. The aims of this study are to evaluate the suitability of a new titanium probe tip for periodontal probing, and to evaluate pain on periodontal probing, in comparison to the existing probe tip used in the Florida Probe® system. The study will be a randomized, blinded, split-mouth controlled trial. Twenty (20) consecutive patients meeting the inclusion criteria will be selected to undergo full-mouth periodontal probing. One half (upper or lower jaw) of the mouth will be probed using the current, standard probe tip; the opposing jaw will be probed using the new trial tip. At a second visit (within 2 weeks), prior to treatment, the mouth will be probed once again, alternating the jaws from the first visit. On each occasion, patients will report on pain on probing utilizing two ungraded 100mm horizontal visual analogue scales (VAS) representing upper and lower jaws of the mouth. Periodontal probing depth measurements will be compared to assess the reproducibility of the two probe tips. Mean VAS values and standard deviations will be calculated for the test and control groups. Data analysis will be conducted using a non-parametric statistical model (Mann-Whitney U Test). Inclusion criteria: * Adult patients: age greater than 18 years. * At least 4 tooth sites with periodontal probing pocket depth (PPD) greater or equal to 4mm. Exclusion criteria: \- Patients using ongoing daily chronic analgesic medications (NSAIDs etc) for over 3 months.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
21
Twenty (20) consecutive adult patients with a diagnosis of periodontal disease (varying degrees, from slight to severe) will be selected to undergo full-mouth periodontal probing. . One half (upper or lower jaw) of the mouth will be probed using the current, standard probe tip.
Twenty (20) consecutive patients meeting the inclusion criteria will be selected to undergo full-mouth periodontal probing. The opposing jaw will be probed using the new trial tip. At a second visit, prior to treatment, the mouth will be probed once again, alternating the jaws from the first visit.
University of Florida College of Dentistry
Gainesville, Florida, United States
VAS (visual analogue scale) value 0-100mm
Patients will report on pain on probing utilizing two ungraded 100mm horizontal visual analogue scales (VAS): line with values from 0-100, where 0 is no pain and 100 is the worst possible pain, representing upper and lower jaws of the mouth. Periodontal probing depth measurements will be compared to assess the reproducibility of the two probe tips.
Time frame: 2 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.