The scientific justification is to fulfill post-market clinical requirements in order to support re-certification of the CE-Mark for this marketed product and to look into safety and efficacy.
Shoulder: The superior labrum (fibrous cartilage) and biceps anchor improve joint stability by acting like a secondary stabilizer to the shoulder. Labral injuries are usually associated with anterior shoulder dislocation. When conservative treatment fails, such as physical therapy, strengthening programs, anti-inflammatories and activity modification to improve symptoms, surgical intervention may be required. Surgical treatments can include simple debridement, stabilization of the biceps-labrum complex through repair, or biceps tenodesis where the end of a tendon is joined surgically to the bone. Outcomes of SLAP (superior labral tear from anterior to posterior) repairs have been reported good throughout the literature, with reported success rates ranging from 71-97%. Hip: The labrum of the hip is a fibrocartilaginous tissue that connects to the bone edge of the acetabulum (the socket of the hip bone), and deepens the acetabular socket while extending coverage of the femoral head; it also aids in hip stabilization. The goal of surgical intervention is to restore normal hip mechanics and treat existing damage.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
83
Fixation device intended to provide secure fixation of soft tissue to bone
New York University Langone Orthopaedic Center
New York, New York, United States
Orthotennessee
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
CPH Privathospital
Farum, Denmark
Pihlajalinna Turku Hospital
Turku, Finland
Clinical Success at 6 Months
Number of participants without signs of failure and/or re-intervention as assessed by the surgeon.
Time frame: 6 month post-surgery
Clinical Success at 12 Months
Number of participants without signs of failure and/or re-intervention at 12 months, as assessed by the surgeon.
Time frame: 12 months post-operative
Intra-operative Anchor Deployment Success
Number of suture anchors that were successfully deployed to bone, soft tissues, or both.
Time frame: Intraoperatively
Intraoperative Suture Anchor Failure
Suture anchor failures categorized by number of participants with: * Intra-operative failures (Yes/No) * Anchors pulled out (Yes/No) * Additional anchors used as a result of failure (Yes/No)
Time frame: Intraoperatively
Device-related Re-Intervention
Number of participants with a device-related adverse event (AE) that required a re-intervention due to the device-related AE.
Time frame: 12 months
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score - All Participants
Assessed participant pain using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) assessments taken 6 and 12 months postoperative intervals. The VAS Pain Score was based on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 representing no pain and 10 the worst possible pain. Note: This Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) was optional and used according to the surgeon's preference.
Time frame: 6 and 12 months postoperative
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Satisfaction Score - All Participants
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini
Roma, Italy
Asepeyo Hospital Sant Cugat
Sant Cugat del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain
Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz
Madrid, Spain
Queen Alexandra Hospital
Cosham, United Kingdom
Fortius Clinic
London, United Kingdom
Assessed participant satisfaction using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) assessments taken at 6 and 12 month postoperative intervals. The VAS Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire was based on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 representing very satisfied and 10 very unsatisfied. This Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) was optional and used according to the surgeon's preference.
Time frame: 6 and 12 months postoperative
Analysis of EQ-5D-5L Index - All Participants
The EQ-5D-5L Index Score was based on a scale of 0 to 1, with higher index values indicating better health and lower index values indicating worse health. This Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) was optional and used according to the surgeon's preference.
Time frame: 6 months and 12 months postoperative
Analysis of Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living (HOOS-ADL) - Hip Participants
The Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living (HOOS-ADL) Score included 5 domains (Symptoms, Pain, Daily Living, Sport \& Recreation and Quality of Life) each assessed at 6 and 12 months postoperative. Each HOOS domain range was based on a scale of 0 to 100, where 0 represents extreme symptoms and 100 represents no symptoms.
Time frame: 6 and 12 months postoperative
Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) - Hip Participants
The Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) is a measurement of dysfunction; the higher the score, the better the outcome. The mHHS score range was as follows: * \<70 (poor result) * 70-79 (fair result) * 80-89 (good result) * \>90 (excellent result) This Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) was optional and used according to the surgeon's preference.
Time frame: Preoperative, 6 and 12 months Postoperative
Rowe Score - Shoulder Participants
The Rowe Scores address categories of shoulder stability, motion, and function. Scores range from 0 to 100 with a score of 90 to 100 points indicating an excellent evaluation, 75 to 89 points indicating a good evaluation, 51 to 74 points indicating a fair evaluation, and 0 to 50 points indicating a poor evaluation. This Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) was optional and used according to the surgeon's preference.
Time frame: 6 and 12 months postoperative
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score - Shoulder Participants
The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES) was based on a scale of 0 to 100 points, where 0 indicated a worse shoulder condition and 100 indicated a better shoulder condition
Time frame: 6 and 12 months postoperative
Constant-Murley Shoulder Scores (CMS) - Shoulder Participants
The Constant-Murley Shoulder Score (CMS) was based on a scale of 0 to 100 points divided into 4 subscales; pain (15 points), Activities of Daily Living (20 points), strength (25 points), and Range of Motion, including: forward elevation, external rotation, abduction, and internal rotation (40 points). The higher the score, the higher the quality of the function (less disability).
Time frame: 6 months and 12 months Postoperative