Te hypothesized that two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery would improve survival in advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian, and primary peritoneal cancer because reduction of one cycle of chemotherapy can lead to the removal of more tumor burden, compared with three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. So the investigators aim to compare survival, rate of successful optimal cytoreductive surgery, post-operative complications, and quality of life between two and three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian, and primary peritoneal cancer.
Primary debulking surgery (PDS) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian and primary peritoneal cancer. However, three or four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) has been introduced in clinical setting because four randomized controlled trials related have shown a lower rate of complications in NAC followed by IDS despite the similar efficacy between PDS and NAC followed by IDS in advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian and primary peritoneal cancers. However, these trials have some limitations that the rate of optimal cytoreduction defined as the size of residual tumor \<1 cm was about 40%, which was a disappointed result not showing the surgical effect improving survival. Nevertheless, more treatment strategies using NAC followed by IDS should be investigated because NAC followed by IDS has been already known as another standard treatment due to the safety. A recent meta-analysis has reported that reduction of one cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy may increase overall survival of 4.1 months because it can induce surgical resection of more visible tumors with drug-resistant. Moreover, a related clinical trial has shown that hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) may increase survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer who received three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy because HIPEC can kill drug-resistant invisible tumor cells which were not resected during IDS. Thus, the investigators designed a phase 3, multicenter, randomized controlled trial for comparing survival, clinical outcomes and quality of life between two and three cycles of NAC followed by IDS, and thereby will investigate the efficacy and safety of reduction of one cycle of NAC.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
298
Two and three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy will be administered in experimental and control groups, respectively
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
RECRUITINGProgression free survival
the time interval from randomization date to disease recurrence or progression date
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death (by any cause, in the absence of disease progression) whichever came first, assessed up to 60 months
Overall survival
the time interval from randomization date to death or end of study date
Time frame: From the date of randomization until death due to any cause, assessed up to 60 months
Time to progression
the time interval from randomization date to disease recurrence or progression except death date
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression in the absence of death by any cause, assessed up to 60 months
Tumor response 1
Tumor response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Time frame: 3 weeks after completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, up to 6 weeks
Tumor response 2
Surgical response after interval debulking surgery
Time frame: 3 weeks after completion of interval debulking surgery, up to 6 weeks
Tumor response 3
Tumor response after adjuvant chemotherapy
Time frame: 3 weeks after completion of adjuvant chemotherapy, up to 6 weeks
Radiologic evaluation of residual tumor
Size of post operative residual tumor on computed tomography (CT) after interval debulking surgery
Time frame: 3 weeks after interval debulking surgery, up to 6 weeks
Functional assessment of residual tumor
Standardized uptake positron emission tomography (PET) CT
Time frame: 3 weeks after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, up to 6 weeks
Assessment of quality of life1
Scoring of quality of life assessment using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Time frame: From the date of screening to the date before treatment start, 3 weeks after interval debulking surgery within 6 weeks, 3 weeks after completion of adjuvant chemotherapy up to 6 weeks, on date of visit at 6 months after completion of primary treatment
Assessment of quality of life2
Scoring of quality of life assessment using the EORTC ovarian cancer module (EORTC QLQ-Ov28)
Time frame: From the date of screening to the date before treatment start, 3 weeks after interval debulking surgery within 6 weeks, 3 weeks after completion of adjuvant chemotherapy up to 6 weeks, on date of visit at 6 months after completion of primary treatment
Assessment of quality of life3
Scoring of quality of life assessment using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-O)
Time frame: From the date of screening to the date before treatment start, 3 weeks after interval debulking surgery within 6 weeks, 3 weeks after completion of adjuvant chemotherapy up to 6 weeks, on date of visit at 6 months after completion of primary treatment
Assessment of quality of life4
Scoring of quality of life assessment using the EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L)
Time frame: From the date of screening to the date before treatment start, 3 weeks after interval debulking surgery within 6 weeks, 3 weeks after completion of adjuvant chemotherapy up to 6 weeks, on date of visit at 6 months after completion of primary treatment
Adverse events
Evaluation of chemotherapy induced toxicity
Time frame: From the date of first day of chemotherapy to the day before starting next cycle. Each cycle is 21 days.
Success rate of optimal cytoreduction
Evaluation of optimal cytoreduction and extent of resection based on modified Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group (KGOG) operation record form and tumor burden index
Time frame: On the date of completion of interval debulking surgery, up to 24 hours
Surgical complexity score (SCS)
Evaluation of difficulty of surgical skills based on surgical complexity score Minimal 0 to maxial 18 point. Each surgery will classified into low (point ≤3), intermediate (4-7), high (≥8) Higher value means more complex surgery.
Time frame: On the date of completion of interval debulking surgery, up to 24 hours
Postoperative complications 1
Incidence of early complications, and severity of complications based on Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Surgical Secondary Events Grading System
Time frame: Early complications: after interval debulking surgery, up to 30 days
Postoperative complications 2
Incidence of late complications, and severity of complications based on Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Surgical Secondary Events Grading System
Time frame: Late complications: 31 days after interval debulking surgery through study completion, an average of 1 year
Estimated blood loss
Estimated blood loss (ml) based on Modified KGOG Operation Record Form
Time frame: after interval debulking surgery up to 3 months
Operation time
Operation time (min) based on Modified KGOG Operation Record Form
Time frame: after interval debulking surgery up to 3 months
Transfusion
Transfusion (count by volume of transfused RBC) based on Modified KGOG Operation Record Form
Time frame: after interval debulking surgery up to 3 months
days of hospitalization
days of hospitalization based on Modified KGOG Operation Record Form
Time frame: after interval debulking surgery up to 3 months
days of management in intensive care unit
days of management in intensive care unit based on Modified KGOG Operation Record Form
Time frame: after interval debulking surgery up to 3 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.