This is a randomized controlled trial to test the effects on long-term weight loss of a novel stigma-reduction intervention combined with standard BWL treatment, as compared to BWL alone. Participants will be a total of 104 men and women seeking weight loss, ages 18 years and older, with a body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m2 or above (or 27 kg/m2 or above with an obesity-related comorbidity), a history of experiencing weight bias, and elevated levels of WBI. Participants will attend a screening visit in which they will complete a behavioral evaluation with a psychologist and a medical history that will be reviewed by a nurse practitioner or physician. Questionnaires assessing experiences and internalization of weight bias, with confirmation by interviewer assessment during the behavioral evaluation, will be used to determine whether participants meet criteria for having high levels of WBI. Eligible consenting participants will be randomly assigned to the standard BWL intervention (n = 52) or the stigma + BWL intervention (n = 52). All participants will attend weekly, 90-minute group meetings for 20 weeks (20 visits). In the stigma + BWL treatment group, 60 minutes will be devoted to BWL and 30 minutes to weight stigma. In the standard BWL treatment group, the additional 30 minutes will be devoted to sharing recipes and food preparation tips. Following 20 weeks of weight loss treatment, participants will attend group meetings focused on weight loss maintenance, monthly from weeks 21-46 (6 visits), and every-other-month from weeks 47-72 (3 visits). Maintenance sessions in the stigma + BWL group will continue to incorporate discussion of WBI and stigma-related barriers to physical activity. Assessments - which include questionnaires, blood draws, and measurements of body weight and physical activity - will occur at baseline and weeks 20, 46 (no blood draw this week), and 72. Weight will be measured at every group meeting for clinical purposes.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
105
Session topics will be based on those tested in a previous pilot study, including: psychoeducation about weight and weight stigma; challenging myths and cognitive distortions related to weight; strategies for coping with instances of stigma; and increasing empowerment and body esteem. The effects of weight stigma on health behaviors will be discussed, and sessions will focus specifically on helping participants overcome stigma-related barriers to physical activity. For example, they will be given strategies to cope with anticipated stigma while exercising in public spaces (e.g., while walking), as well as to challenge self-critical beliefs (e.g., that they are lazy) which may otherwise lead them to avoid exercising. These concrete strategies, along with reducing WBI and improving self-confidence, are intended to increase participants' self-efficacy for and engagement in physical activity.
This intervention will be based on the Diabetes Prevention Program. A diet of 1200-1499 calories per day will be prescribed for participants \< 250 lb, and 1500-1800 for those ≥ 250 lb. Participants will be instructed to eat a balanced deficit diet. Session topics during the first 20 weeks will include self-monitoring, stimulus control, social support, portion sizes, and goal-setting. Those during weeks 21-72 will focus on skills required for weight loss maintenance and relapse prevention. Physical activity will be begin with a prescription of 60 min/wk, and will gradually progress by 10 minutes over 2-4 week intervals until achieving 150 min/wk by week 20, 200 min/wk by week 46, and 250 min/wk by week 72. Participants will be instructed to spread the activity equally across at least 5 days in bouts that are \>10 minutes in duration. Moderate intensity will be prescribed with an emphasis on walking; the vast majority of our research participants self-select this form of activity.
The University of Pennsylvania Center for Weight and Eating Disorders
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Percent Weight Change at Week 72
Estimated mean percent change in weight from baseline to week 72
Time frame: Baseline to week 72
Loss of 5% or Greater of Initial Body Weight at Week 72
The percentage of participants who lost 5% or greater of their initial body weight at week 72
Time frame: Baseline to week 72
Loss of 10% or Greater of Initial Body Weight at Week 72
The percentage of participants who lost 10% or greater of their initial body weight at week 72
Time frame: Baseline to week 72
Percent Weight Change at Week 46
Estimated mean percent weight change
Time frame: Baseline to week 46
Percent Weight Change at Week 20
Estimated mean percent weight change
Time frame: Baseline to week 20
Loss of 5% or Greater of Initial Body Weight at Week 46
The percentage of participants who lost 5% or greater of their initial body weight at week 46
Time frame: Baseline to week 46
Loss of 10% or Greater of Initial Body Weight at Week 46
The percentage of participants who lost 10% or greater of their initial body weight at week 46
Time frame: Baseline to week 46
Loss of 5% or Greater of Initial Body Weight at Week 20
The percentage of participants who lost 5% or greater of their initial body weight at week 20
Time frame: Baseline to week 20
Loss of 10% or Greater of Initial Body Weight at Week 20
The percentage of participants who lost 10% or greater of their initial body weight at week 20
Time frame: Baseline to week 20
Change in Minutes of Physical Activity (Accelerometer) at Week 72
Estimated mean change in daily minutes of physical activity, as measured by accelerometry
Time frame: Baseline to week 72
Change in Minutes of Physical Activity (Accelerometer) at Week 46
Estimated mean change in daily minutes of physical activity, as measured by accelerometry
Time frame: Baseline to week 46
Change in Minutes of Physical Activity (Accelerometer) at Week 20
Estimated mean change in daily minutes of physical activity, as measured by accelerometry
Time frame: Baseline to week 20
Change in Energy Expenditure at Week 72
Estimated mean change in energy expenditure, as measured by the Paffenbarger Physical Activity Questionnaire. Higher kilocalories (kcal) indicate greater energy expenditure.
Time frame: Baseline to week 72
Change in Energy Expenditure at Week 46
Estimated mean change in energy expenditure, as measured by the Paffenbarger Physical Activity Questionnaire. Higher kilocalories (kcal) indicate greater energy expenditure.
Time frame: Baseline to week 46
Change in Energy Expenditure at Week 20
Estimated mean change in energy expenditure, as measured by the Paffenbarger Physical Activity Questionnaire. Higher kilocalories (kcal) indicate greater energy expenditure.
Time frame: Baseline to week 20
Change in Exercise Self-efficacy at Week 72
Estimated mean change on the Self-Efficacy to Exercise Scale (total score 0-90; higher scores = greater self-efficacy)
Time frame: Baseline to week 72
Change in Exercise Self-efficacy at Week 46
Estimated mean change on the Self-Efficacy to Exercise Scale (total score 0-90; higher scores = greater self-efficacy)
Time frame: Baseline to week 46
Change in Exercise Self-efficacy at Week 20
Estimated mean change on the Self-Efficacy to Exercise Scale (total score 0-90; higher scores = greater self-efficacy)
Time frame: Baseline to week 20
Change in Eating Self-efficacy at Week 72
Estimated mean change on the Weight Efficacy Lifestyle Questionnaire - Short Form (total score 0-72; higher scores = greater self-efficacy)
Time frame: Baseline to week 72
Change in Eating Self-efficacy at Week 46
Estimated mean change on the Weight Efficacy Lifestyle Questionnaire - Short Form (total score 0-72; higher scores = greater self-efficacy)
Time frame: Baseline to week 46
Change in Eating Self-efficacy at Week 20
Estimated mean change on the Weight Efficacy Lifestyle Questionnaire - Short Form (total score 0-72; higher scores = greater self-efficacy)
Time frame: Baseline to week 20
Change in Triglycerides at Week 72
Estimated mean change in triglyceride concentration in blood
Time frame: Baseline to week 72
Change in Triglycerides at Week 20
Estimated mean change in triglyceride concentration in blood
Time frame: Baseline to week 20
Change in Blood Pressure at Week 72
Estimated mean change in blood pressure (systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure; mmHg)
Time frame: Baseline to week 72
Change in Blood Pressure Week 20
Estimated mean change in blood pressure (systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure; mmHg)
Time frame: Baseline to week 20
Change in Weight Bias Internalization Scale Score at Week 72
Estimated mean change score on the Weight Bias Internalization Scale (scale scoring 1-7; higher scores indicate greater weight bias internalization).
Time frame: Baseline to week 72
Change in Weight Bias Internalization Scale Score at Week 46
Estimated mean change score on the Weight Bias Internalization Scale (scale scoring 1-7; higher scores indicate greater weight bias internalization)
Time frame: Baseline to week 46
Change in Weight Bias Internalization Scale Score at Week 20
Estimated mean change score on the Weight Bias Internalization Scale (scale scoring 1-7; higher scores indicate greater weight bias internalization)
Time frame: Baseline to week 20
"Remission" of Elevated Weight Bias Internalization at Week 72
Percentage of participants who score below 4.0 on the Weight Bias Internalization Scale (scale scoring 1-7; higher scores indicate greater weight bias internalization)
Time frame: Baseline to week 72
"Remission" of Elevated Weight Bias Internalization at Week 46
Percentage of participants who score below 4.0 on the Weight Bias Internalization Scale (scale scoring 1-7; higher scores indicate greater weight bias internalization)
Time frame: Baseline to week 46
"Remission" of Elevated Weight Bias Internalization at Week 20
Percentage of participants who score below 4.0 on the Weight Bias Internalization Scale (scale scoring 1-7; higher scores indicate greater weight bias internalization)
Time frame: Baseline to week 20
Change in Weight Self-stigma Scores at Week 72
Estimated mean change score for Total score (WSSQ-Total, summed 12-60) and two subscales of Self-Devaluation (WSSQ-SD) and Fear of Enacted Stigma (WSSQ-FE) (summed 6-30); higher scores indicate greater weight self-stigma.
Time frame: Baseline to week 72
Change in Weight Self-stigma Scores at Week 46
Estimated mean change score for Total score (WSSQ-Total, summed 12-60) and two subscales of Self-Devaluation (WSSQ-SD) and Fear of Enacted Stigma (WSSQ-FE) (summed 6-30); higher scores indicate greater weight self-stigma.
Time frame: Baseline to week 46
Change in Weight Self-stigma Scores at Week 20
Estimated mean change score for Total score (WSSQ-Total, summed 12-60) and two subscales of Self-Devaluation (WSSQ-SD) and Fear of Enacted Stigma (WSSQ-FE) (summed 6-30); higher scores indicate greater weight self-stigma.
Time frame: Baseline to week 20
Treatment Acceptability at Week 20
To assess treatment acceptability, participants in both groups rated (1-7) how acceptable and helpful the program was, how much they liked the program, and how satisfied they were; scores for these 4 items were averaged. Participants also rated (1-7) the BWL treatment, as well as the stigma intervention (i.e., BIAS component) or recipe exchange, on how helpful they found each component of the program, how much they liked the components, and how much they learned. Scores for these three items were averaged (1-7) separately for the BWL treatment, BIAS component, and recipe exchange. Participants rated how much they learned BWL scores, and how much they learned and used skills related to stigma (all averaged 1-7). Higher scores indicate greater treatment acceptability.
Time frame: Week 20
Treatment Acceptability at Week 72
To assess treatment acceptability, participants in both groups rated (1-7) how acceptable and helpful the program was, how much they liked the program, and how satisfied they were; scores for these 4 items were averaged. Participants also rated (1-7) the BWL treatment, as well as the stigma intervention (i.e., BIAS component) or recipe exchange, on how helpful they found each component of the program, how much they liked the components, and how much they learned. Scores for these three items were averaged (1-7) separately for the BWL treatment, BIAS component, and recipe exchange. Participants rated how much they learned BWL scores, and how much they learned and used skills related to stigma (all averaged 1-7). Higher scores indicate greater treatment acceptability.
Time frame: Week 72
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.