Multi-center, open-label, randomized trial of patients with low-risk, HER2+ disease, who will receive adjuvant taxane-based chemotherapy (i.e. docetaxel and cyclophosphamide with trastuzumab \[TC-H\] or weekly paclitaxel with trastuzumab \[P-H\]) at the standard approved doses, aiming to gather more information regarding cost-effectiveness, toxicity, quality of life (QoL), patient reported outcomes and clinical benefits of the two treatment strategies.
Multi-center, open-label, randomized trial of patients with low-risk, HER2+ disease, who will receive adjuvant taxane-based chemotherapy (i.e. docetaxel and cyclophosphamide with trastuzumab \[TC-H\] or weekly paclitaxel with trastuzumab \[P-H\]) at the standard approved doses. The primary objective is to estimate the feasibility of opening a pragmatic clinical trial with an Integrated Consent Model Secondary objectives are: Compare adverse events/ toxicity profile between the two different approaches (i.e. neutropenia, peripheral neuropathy, treatment-related hospitalizations, proportion of patients completing the chemotherapy component of their treatment); Estimate the cost of each chemotherapy regimen and potential cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of Canada's health care system; Evaluate the impact on activities of daily living as reflected by self-reported fatigue and pain using the FACT-Taxane and FACIT-Fatigue scores. In this study, the investigator will obtain oral consent using the prepared REB approved Consent Script. If the patient agrees to participate, the physician will dictate in the progress note they have had the above conversation with the patient. There will be no need for the patient to sign an informed consent form.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
51
chemotherapy
London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, Canada
The Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre
Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
Feasibility of performing a pragmatic clinical trial with an Integrated Consent Model.
Feasibility of performing this study will be measured with 2 composite endpoints: number of patients who received either TC-H or P-H chemotherapy compared to the number of participants who were approached to enter the study.
Time frame: up to 12 months.
Adverse events/ toxicity profile between the two different approaches.
Toxicity profile (NCI CTC version 4.1)
Time frame: up to 12 months.
Cost of each chemotherapy regimen and potential cost-effectiveness analysis.
Health system cost of each chemotherapy regimen.
Time frame: up to 12 months.
Cost-effectiveness analysis.
Cost per one quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained.
Time frame: up to 12 months.
Cost-effectiveness analysis.
Use of primary or secondary febrile neutropenia prophylaxis.
Time frame: up to 12 months.
Quality of life as reflected by self-reported fatigue using FACIT-Fatigue scores.
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy -Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) scores
Time frame: up to 12 months.
Quality of life as reflected by self-reported pain using FACT-Taxane scores
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Taxane Scores.
Time frame: up to 12 motnhs.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.