The study evaluates the effects of Prazosin on agitation in adults with Alzheimer's disease. Two thirds of the participants will participate in the medication portion, while one third will participate in the placebo portion
Prazosin for Disruptive Agitation in Alzheimer's Disease (PEACE-AD) is a Phase IIb multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 12-weeks treatment with the brain active alpha-1 adrenoreceptor (AR) antagonist prazosin for disruptive agitation in 35 Alzheimer's disease (AD) residents in a long-term care (LTC) setting or living at home with full-time caregiving. Distruptive agitation defined as having one or more of the following behaviors nearly daily during the previous week and at least intermittently for four weeks prior to screening: a) irritability, b) physically and/or verbally aggressive behavior, c) physically resistive to necessary care, d) and/or pressured motor activity (e.g., pressured pacing). LTC is defined as assisted living or skilled nursing facility. Home dwelling participants require full-time caregiving defined as having continuous daily caregiving and a Study Partner who will assist in providing protocol specific information to the study team. A previous single site pilot study addressing disruptive agitation in 22 predominantly LTC-residing AD participants demonstrated efficacy of prazosin on all three primary outcome measures.1 The current multicenter study is funded by the National Institute on Aging (NIA), and coordinated through the NIA-funded Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study (ADCS).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
35
Oral prazosin HCl capsules (or placebo) will be administered twice daily, with individualized doses up to a maximum of 4 mg QAM mid-morning and 6 mg at bedtime (QHS), or matching placebo capsules
Placebo capsule matched to appearance of active drug.
Banner Sun Health Research Institute
Sun City, Arizona, United States
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California, United States
ADCS-Clinical Global Impression of Change in Agitation (ADCS-CGIC-A)
The ADCS-CGIC-A is the primary outcome measure. It will be anchored to disruptive agitation, the target behaviors in this study. It measures whether the effects of active treatment are substantial enough to be detected by a skilled and experienced clinician on the basis of a direct examination of the participant and an interview of the participant's primary caregiver and other LTC facility staff. The baseline assessment is qualitative therefore there is no score at baseline; post-baseline scores represent a change score compared to baseline. The ADCS-CGIC-A is a 7-point scale that is structured as the clinician's assessment of change from baseline compared to the ADCS-CGIC-A Baseline Worksheet. There is no baseline score; post-baseline scores range from 1 (improvement) to 7 (worsening). A score of 1-2 indicates clinically meaningful improvement; a score of 3-5 indicates no clinically meaningful change; a score of 6-7 indicates clinically meaningful worsening.
Time frame: From Baseline through Week 12.
Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)/Neuropsychiatry Inventory-Nursing Home Version (NPI-NH)
The NPI was designed to characterize the neuropsychiatric symptoms and psychopathology of patients with AD and other dementias residing in the community about which information was obtained from family caregivers. The content of the questions and their scoring in the NPI-NH are identical to those of the NPI except for some slight rephrasing to be consistent with the LTC environment where information is gathered from professional caregivers. Assessment of the impact of behavioral disturbances on family and professional caregivers, is assessed by a caregiver distress scale in the NPI and an occupational disruptiveness scale in the NPI-NH; scoring of this component remains identical. Minimum score is 0 and highest score is 144. A higher score means a worse outcome. This outcome is the change from baseline to week 12.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Rescue Medication: Total mg Lorazepam Administered
Cumulative total dose of Lorazepam rescue medication administered during the trial. Information on the total mg rescue lorazepam administered will be collected as additional secondary outcome measures. If prazosin is more effective than placebo, it is predicted that participants randomized to prazosin will be prescribed lower cumulative mg of rescue lorazepam for management of persistent or worsening disruptive agitation.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
University of California, San Diego (UCSD)
San Diego, California, United States
Alta California Medical Group
Simi Valley, California, United States
Stanford University
Stanford, California, United States
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Northern Light/Acadia Hospital Eastern Maine Medical Center
Bangor, Maine, United States
SUNY Upstate Medical University
Syracuse, New York, United States
VAMC: James J Peters
The Bronx, New York, United States
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, United States
...and 4 more locations
Time frame: 12 weeks
Study Discontinuations
Cox proportional hazard modelling comparing the median time to drop out between treatment groups.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Responder Analysis on CGIC-A
Comparison of proportions of responders versus non responders on the ADCS-CGIC-A. Responders are defined as those with moderate or marked improvement in agitation symptoms compared to baseline assessment.
Time frame: 12 weeks
ADCS-ADL-Severe
The ADCS-ADL-Severe questionnaire is a secondary outcome measure aimed at detecting functional decline in people with severe AD. This scale is best suited for evaluating people with MMSE scores below 15/30, or equivalent. Questions are administered to a qualified caregiver informant about a set of 19 basic and instrumental ADL. Instrumental ADL are selected to be relevant to this level of severity of dementia, e.g., obtaining a beverage, turning lights on and off, turning a faucet on and off. Performance of each of these activities during the past 4 weeks, as well as the level of performance, are rated. A total score is derived by summing scores across items, and ranges from 0 (maximal impairment) to 54 (maximally independent function). This outcome is the change from baseline to week 12.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Caregiver Distress on NPI/NPI-NH
Comparison of effects on caregiver distress/occupational disruptiveness scores on the NPI/NPI-NH. Minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 60. A higher score is a worse outcome. This outcome is the change from baseline to week 12.
Time frame: 12 weeks