Proper identification of patients who would benefit from fluid infusion (fluid responsiveness) is one of the most crucial challenges in anaesthesia and critical care. Reliability of several invasive measurements used for this purpose for many years have been questioned recently. The study will evaluate consistency between carotid artery flow derivatives and standard haemodynamic measurement (LIDCO rapid) in navigation of intraoperative fluid therapy.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
61
All patients included in the study will receive 5 ml/kg fluid bolus of a balanced crystalloid solution.
Medical University Of Warsaw
Warsaw, Mazovian, Poland
Change in cardiac output
A measure of change of scaled cardiac output (nCO) with LiDCO device
Time frame: Before and 2 minutes after intervention
Change in a corrected carotid artery flow
Ultrasound measure of corrected carotid artery flow time
Time frame: Before and 2 minutes after intervention
Change in pulse pressure variation
A measure of change of pulse pressure variation (PPV) with LiDCO device
Time frame: Before and 2 minutes after intervention
Change in stroke volume variation
A measure of change of pulse pressure variation with LiDCO device
Time frame: Before and 2 minutes after intervention
Change in a carotid blood flow
Ultrasound measure of corrected carotid blood flow time
Time frame: Before and 2 minutes after intervention
Change in a velocity time integral of carotid flow
Ultrasound measure of velocity time integral of carotid flow
Time frame: Before and 2 minutes after intervention
Change in the maximal systolic carotid velocity variation
Ultrasound measure of the maximal systolic carotid velocity variation
Time frame: Before and 2 minutes after intervention
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.