Interventions that address criminogenic risk factors, such as Thinking for a Change (T4C), are not used with prisoners with serious mental illness (SMI) because of the neurocognitive and social impairments associated with SMI. This study examines the effectiveness of T4C with a modified delivery system designed specifically to address the unique needs of persons with SMI in prison, including improving impulsivity, criminal attitudes, and interpersonal problem solving (treatment targets) and levels of aggression, and the amount of behavioral infractions and time spent in administrative segregation in prison (outcomes).
Interventions are urgently needed to improve the delivery and impact of mental health services for persons with serious mental illnesses (SMI) in prison. Treatments addressing the symptoms of mental illness form a critical component of the continuum of services needed by prisoners with SMI. However, a growing body of literature shows that mental health treatments need to be combined with treatments that directly address criminogenic risk factors (i.e., those factors most closely associated with criminal activities). Despite promising evidence, interventions that address criminogenic risk factors, such as Thinking for a Change (T4C), are not used with prisoners with SMI because of the neurocognitive and social impairments associated with SMI. This study examines the effectiveness of T4C with a modified delivery system designed specifically to address the unique needs of persons with SMI in prison. This small-scale randomized controlled trail (RCT) explores the potential effectiveness of T4C-SMI towards improving impulsivity, criminal attitudes, and interpersonal problem solving (treatment targets) and levels of aggression, and the amount of behavioral infractions and time spent in administrative segregation in prison (outcomes). The study will also examine whether the treatment targets for T4C-SMI mediate the intervention's impact on outcomes. The long-term goal is to grow the evidence-base for interventions with the capacity to improve prison and community-reentry outcomes for persons with SMI. This study will provide the data needed to implement a rigorous RCT in a future study and supports NIMH's mission to develop innovative interventions in mental health services.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
T4C-SMI entails a 25-session, manualized intervention that is delivered in a closed-group format at least twice a week over a three-month period. The intervention curriculum includes three modules: nine sessions on social skills training, five sessions on cognitive restructuring activities, and ten sessions on problem-solving methods. Participants assigned to T4C-SMI receive this intervention in addition to any other prison mental health services that they are otherwise eligible to receive during their incarceration.
North Carolina Department of Public Safety
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Change in Levels of Aggression Score From Baseline to Month 3
Aggression Questionnaire - Short Form is a 12-item measure with four subscales: physical aggression, verbal aggression, anger, and hostility. Items are scored on a 6-point Likert scale. Scores range from 12 to 72. The higher the score the more aggression present.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3
Change in Levels of Aggression Score From Baseline to Month 6
Aggression Questionnaire - Short Form is a 12-item measure with four subscales: physical aggression, verbal aggression, anger, and hostility. Items are scored on a 6-point Likert scale. Scores range from 12 to 72. The higher the score the more aggression present.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6
Number of Participants With Post Test Behavioral Infractions
Number of participants who have at least 1 behavioral infraction following the intervention. Prison records used to ascertain the number of participants who receive behavioral infractions.
Time frame: End of intervention through Month 9, approximately 6 months total
Median Number of Days in Administrative Segregation
Prison records will be used to determine the total number of days participants are placed in administrative segregation.
Time frame: End of intervention through Month 9, approximately 6 months total
Change in Overall Interpersonal Problem Solving Score
The Social Problem Solving Inventory - Revised, Long (SPSI-R:L) is a 52-item measure of problem solving skills and problem orientation. Items are measured on a 5-point Likert scale. It has three subscales: problem orientation, problem solving skills, and social problem-solving inventory. The total raw score range is from 0 to 20. Higher score mean more positive social problem solving skills.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
100
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3
Change in Overall Criminal Attitudes Score
The Measure of Criminal Attitudes and Associates (MCAA) Part B is a 46-item measure. Responses are recorded in an agree/disagree format. MCAA includes four scales: attitudes toward violence, sentiments of entitlement, antisocial intent, and associates. Scores range from 0 to 46. Lower scores indicate lower levels of criminal attitudes.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3
Change in Overall Impulsivity Score
Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11) is a 30 item self-report measure. Items scored on a 4-point Likert scale. It is comprised of six subscales including attention, cognitive instability, perseverance, self-control, motor impulsiveness, and cognitive complexity. The total score ranges from 30 to 120. Lower scores indicate lower levels of impulsiveness.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3