The aim of the present study is to assess the clinical performance (patient satisfaction, fracture, shade matching, Marginal adaptation and sensitivity) of laminate veneers made with celtra duo press ceramic and IPS e.max press ceramic with incisal wrap design.
Ceramic materials are widely used for esthetic restorations because of their physical and optical properties that enhance patient satisfaction to dental restorations. several ceramic materials are currently available, including the lithium-reinforced glass ceramic like e.max press, which stands out for its excellent esthetic appearance and mechanical properties.also ZLS (zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate) are a function of its unique micro structure (500-700 nm in size, correspond exactly to the wavelength range of natural daylight). The presence of 10% zirconia in the glass phase in atomically dissolved form provides high strength and ensures safe and long-lasting restorations .The result is a large number of very fine-grained lithium silicate crystals, whose high glass content give the material its excellent light-optical and mechanical properties. Translucency, opalescence, fluorescence and the chameleon effect all benefit, with high edge stability and excellent polishability being an added plus.3 Despite the recent introduction of improved ceramic materials, patient satisfaction with restoration contour,symmetry,margins and shade matching natural teeth with ceramic restorations is still one of the major challenges in clinical practice. The determination and interpretation of natural tooth color involve the selection and reproduction of ceramic shade and choice of restorative material. These factors have had a major influence on the final color of restorative treatments. Color-measuring instruments assist in shade analysis, thus minimizing the subjective variables of this process. Color readings allow improved determination of the restoration shade and better communication with the dental laboratory.4The influences of underlying substrate,8-9 luting agent,ceramic thickness and translucency, and restoration type14 on the color variation of ceramic restorations have been investigated in in vitro studies. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical performance of celtra duo press ceramic and IPS e.max press ceramic laminate veneers including patient satisfaction, fracture, shad matching, marginal adaptation and sensitivity.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Enrollment
6
celtra duo press ingot
IPS e.max press ingot
department of fixed prosthodontic-Cairo university
Cairo, Egypt
color matching
shad matching of both laminate veneers made with two materials compared to normal teeth will be evaluated using modified united state public health service criteria (USPHS) 0 Excellent colour match and shade between restoration and adjacent tooth, almost invisible. 1 Slightly mismatching between the restoration and the adjacent tooth, which is in the normal range of tooth colour, translucence and/or shade. 3 Obvious mismatch, beyond the normal range. 4 Gross mismatch/aesthetically displeasing colour, shade and/or translucence.
Time frame: 0ne year
fracture
fracture of dental laminate veneers made with two materials will be evaluated using modified united state public health service criteria (USPHS) 0 no fracture 1. minor cracks line over the restoration 2. minor chipping of the restoration (1/4) 3. moderate chipping of the restoration (1/2) 4. sever chipping of the restoration 5. complete fracture
Time frame: one year
patient satisfaction
Primary objective to assess clinical performance (patient satisfaction) of laminate veneers made with celtra duo press ceramic and IPS e.max press ceramic with incisal wrap design using questionnaire. Questions Are you satisfied with new laminate? Are you satisfied with your laminate color? Have you noticed any color change in your crown till now? Do you feel that your laminate looks natural? Have you suffered from any kind of pain or problem during laminate use? Do you like your laminate alignment? Do you like your general appearance? Do you feel that the laminate is in harmony with the adjacent teeth? Have you experienced gingival or periodontal inflammation around the laminate after its insertion? Has the laminate stability affected through this year? the participant should be answer yes or no
Time frame: one year
Marginal adaptation
Marginal adaptation of both laminate veneers made with two materials will be evaluated using modified united state public health service criteria (USPHS) 0= smooth margin 1. enamel exposed 2. base or dentin exposed 3. debonding from one end 4. debonding from both ends
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: one year
sensitivity
sensitivity of teeth that restored with laminate veneers made with two materials will be evaluated using modified united state public health service criteria (USPHS) 0 no sensitivity 1. slight sensitivity 2. moderate sensitivity 3. sever sensitivity
Time frame: one year