Improvements in downstaging are required when using preoperative chemoradiation for unresectable rectal cancer. There is therefore a need to explore more effective schedules. The study arm will receive MRI simulation-guided boost in short-course preoperative radiotherapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy , which may enhance the shrinkage of tumor comparing with the concurrent chemoradiation.
The study is a prospective phase II randomized multicenter trial. The purpose of this study is to compare short-term radiotherapy with MRI simulation-guided boost followed by consolidation chemotherapy(Experimental group) with preoperative long-term chemoradiotherapy(Control group) for middle-lower unresectable locally advanced rectal cancer evaluated by MRI. The primary endpoint is the rate of R0 resection and cCR, and the secondary objectives are local recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival and overall survival at 3-year and 5-year follow up. Furthermore, pathological complete response rate, the acute and late toxicity profile and quality of life (QOL) after 3 years follow-up are secondary endpoints. The exploratory end point includes the circulating tumor DNA, and other potential biomarkers from tumor tissue and blood sample for treatment response and survival predicting. For each group, a plan for collection of serum/plasma/feces at baseline and different stages during or after treatment and for obtaining fresh tumor tissue for freezing prior to treatment was defined in the protocol. The SUNRISE-trial has been designed by National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, and the hypothesis is R0 resection rate in Experimental group was superior to that in Control group. Interim analysis design: As a phase II trial, the safety of experimental intervention is a major concern. We took the toxicity data from STELLAR, a phase III randomized study led by our center, as a reference. The incidence of G3 and above side effects in the short course radiotherapy with sequential neoadjuvant chemotherapy group was 28%, and that in the standard long-course concurrent chemoradiotherapy control group was 5%. Considering that boost dose may increase toxicity, if severe toxicity in the study group significantly exceeds that in the control group by more than 35%, it is up to the principal investigator to decide whether to modify the study protocol or terminate the study. The sample size of the interim analysis was calculated by the Z-pooled test, with α=0.05 (one-sided test), 1-β=0.90, using PASS 11 software. The frequency of the toxicity of G3 and above should be compared when neoadjuvant therapy was completed in 21 patients enrolled in each group.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
200
Short-course preoperative radiotherapy(SCPRT), which consists of 5 Gy x 5f and 4Gy for boost on the GTV with MRI-simulation alone.
Long-term chemoradiotherapy(CRT), which consists of a long-term chemoradiation (2 Gy x 25 with capecitabine) preoperatively.
Patients will receive consolidation chemotherapy after 7-10 days of SCPRT completed, given in 3 week cycle of capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily, day 1-14 combined with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 once. In total, 4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy are scheduled before surgery.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College
Beijing, China
RECRUITINGR0(microscopically margin-negative) resection and cCR rate
The composite outcome of R0 (microscopically margin-negative) resection and cCR, that is, the combined rate of radical resection and cCR management after neoadjuvant treatment.
Time frame: 1-month after surgery completed
local recurrence-free survival
the time from surgery to local recurrence
Time frame: 3-year and 5-year
distant metastasis-free survival
the time from diagnosis to metastasis
Time frame: 3-year and 5-year
disease-free survival
the time from surgery to recurrence
Time frame: 3-year and 5-year
overall survival
the time from diagnosis to death
Time frame: 3-year and 5-year
pathological complete response rate
pathological complete response in surgery specimen
Time frame: 1-month after surgery completed
clinical complete response rate
clinical complete response evaluated by MDT
Time frame: 3-month after neoadjuvant treatment
the acute toxicity profile
the frequency of acute adverse events during and after treatment in 1-month, including gastrointestinal (vomiting, diarrhea and incontinence), dermatitis, and hematologic toxicity evaluated weekly by the Common Terminology Criteria 4.0.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: 1-month
the late toxicity profile
the late toxicity after treatment completion for 1-month, the frequency of late adverse events after 1-month of treatment, including gastrointestinal function, fistula, and hematologic toxicity, evaluated regularly by LENT-SOMA scoring systems.
Time frame: 3-year
general quality of life (QoL) by QLQ-30
general quality of life of patients evaluated by questionaire of EORTC QLQ-C30. The higher score in total indicates the worse quality of life in general.
Time frame: 3-year
QoL by QLO-CR29
quality of life related to colorectal disease of patients evaluated by questionaire of EORTC QLQ-CR29. The higher score in total of this module indicates the worse quality of life by colorectal module.
Time frame: 3-year
Sum of sustained clinical complete response rate and R0 resection rate
the rate of sustained clinical complete response plus rate of R0 resection
Time frame: 12 months after neoadjuvant therapy