Investigators are conducting this study due to recent reports of many of existing malaria drugs becoming less effective for treatment of malaria. The drugs may not always kill all the parasites, therefore not all patients with malaria are being cured. The main objective of the study is to find out which malaria drugs and what drug combinations are still effective in Cambodia, an area of multi-drug resistance where 4-5 artemisinin-based combination therapies have shown inadequate response, below that established by the World Health Organization (WHO). New drug combinations (taking more than one drug for malaria at the same time), as long as well tolerated, can provide cure in patients that harbor parasites not responsive to standard first-line medications. Human genetic testing will be done to identify patients who may have suboptimal response to treatments and to study the differences in human gene expression to explain why some persons are at higher risk of complications during treatment. Markers of drug resistance to commonly used antimalarial drugs will also be evaluated and shared with national malaria program (CNM) to better guide future malaria treatment decisions in Cambodia.
Efficacy to drugs that are currently available and new antimalarial candidates that are in development are threatened by multidrug resistant (MDR) malaria parasites, widely prevalent in Cambodia. Without effective interventions, MDR malaria can pose a substantial public health threat in the years to come. Therefore, accurate, timely and relevant data on antimalarial drug resistance is of critical importance. Prompt, effective and well-tolerated treatment remains one of the cornerstones in the malaria case management. Recent malaria outbreak in Thailand and rise of malaria cases observed in Cambodia in 2017 has brought to the forefront the urgency with which new drug candidates and new combination drug treatments must be identified; otherwise, patients may be left with ineffective treatments. Lack of available alternatives has a potential to result in significant setback to the recent gains in malaria control and malaria elimination efforts. Innovative approaches to treatment proposed here, using current ACTs in combination with non-ACT drugs, such as atovaquone-proguanil, need to be investigated to assess drug tolerability and overall efficacy when used under combination treatment. By early investment in the studies of drugs such as pyronaridine-artesunate (ASPY), in combination with other antimalarials, and drug combinations proposed under this protocol, this study will try to provide the latest evidence on the interventions that are most likely to work, even in areas of MDR, such as Cambodia, and along the Cambodia-Thai border. It is hoped that our approach for using combination treatments will not only provide more effective treatments, but it might prolong the lifespan of the remaining antimalarials and delay the spread of MDR malaria to neighboring countries.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
252
Standard weight based dosing
Both drugs (AP) and (ASPY) are administered once a day, on days 0, 1, and 2.
Sequential treatment with ASMQ (on days 0, 1, and 2) followed by the treatment with AP for 3 more days (total 6 days treatment)
Anlong Veng Referral Hospital
Anlong Veaeng, Cambodia
RECRUITINGKratie Referral Hospital
Kratié, Cambodia
RECRUITINGStung Treng Referral Hospital
Stung Treng, Cambodia
NOT_YET_RECRUITING42-day polymerase chain reaction (PCR) corrected adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR), following treatment with ASPY and new drug combinations (AP+ACTs).
Time frame: 6 weeks
Prevalence of molecular markers of drug resistance
Time frame: Day of enrollment and day of malaria recurrence up to 8 weeks
Drug susceptibility testing of parasite isolates against standard antimalarial drugs
Ex vivo drug susceptibility testing
Time frame: Day of enrollment and day of malaria recurrence up to 8 weeks
Pharmakokinetics of each study drug - (Cmax)
Peak plasma concentration (Cmax) for study drugs
Time frame: multiple time points up to 8 weeks
Pharmakokinetics of each study drug - (AUC)
Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC)
Time frame: multiple time points up to 8 weeks
Pharmakokinetics of each study drug - volume of distribution
volume of distribution for study drugs
Time frame: multiple time points throughout 6 weeks of follow up
Pharmakokinetics of each study drug - (T1/2)
elimination half-life (T1/2) for study drugs
Time frame: multiple time points up to 8 weeks
Kaplan Meier survival analysis of asexual blood stage parasitemia and sexual stage gametocytes
Time frame: 6 weeks
Gametocyte carriage rates on days 0, 1, 2, 3, and weeks 1 through 6 for each treatment arm
Time frame: Days 0, 1, 2, 3, and weekly, up to week 8
The incidence of hepatotoxicity events for each treatment arm
Alanine aminotransferase (ALT)\>5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) or percent of volunteers meeting the Hy's law definition (ALT or aspartate aminotransferase \[AST\] \>3 x ULN and total bilirubin \>2 x ULN) at any post-dose time point within 6 weeks of follow up
Time frame: Day 3 and week 6
Rates of treatment-related adverse events
Time frame: 6 weeks
Severity of treatment-related adverse events
Grade 1 - mild, Grade 2 - moderate, Grade 3 - severe, Grade 4- life threatening
Time frame: 6 weeks
Number of participants who say they are willing to take the same drug combination in the future
Time frame: day 2 and week 6
Point efficacy with 95% Confidence Interval against blood stage malaria infection classified according to the WHO malaria treatment outcome classifications (ETF, LTF, LCTF, LPTF)
Time frame: 4 weeks, 6 weeks, and 8 weeks
Incidence of Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency
Comparative incidence of G6PD deficiency in the study population as determined by G6PD rapid-diagnostic tests (RDTs) and quantitative tests, to include sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV) for each of the point-of-care tests against 10%, 30%, and 60% thresholds of normal G6PD activity
Time frame: Enrollment
Number of infected mosquitos following membrane feeding
Time frame: Day 0, Day 3, Day 7, and on day of malaria recurrence up to 8 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.