Exoskeleton-assisted Training to Accelerate Walking Recovery Early After Stroke: the TARGET Phase II Study

Universiteit Antwerpen19 enrolled

Overview

Phase II: Investigating the effects of additional robot-assisted gait training either initiated early (2 weeks post-stroke) or delayed (8 weeks post-stroke) after stroke onset.

GENERAL: Pre-clinical research has pointed towards a time window of enhanced responsiveness to therapy early after stroke. For example, training has led to substantial recovery if initiated 5 or 14, but not 30 days post-stroke in a rodent model (Biernaski 2004). It is suggested that this early period is characterized by heightened levels of plasticity and that training can exploit this leading to improved outcome. The typically observed non-linear recovery pattern in stroke survivors (Kwakkel 2004) might suggest that similar mechanisms are induced in the human brain, however clinical research on this is disappointingly sparse. In two closely inter-related phases, we aim to examine the biomechanical changes related to walking recovery in general (Phase I) and the specific effects of robot-assisted training (Phase II). By that, we aim to detect a time window in stroke survivors which resembles the same characteristics as observed in animal models. To initiate gait training at an early stage, when patients usually present severe weakness and balance deficits, a mobile exoskeleton is used which is developed to provide intensive walking practice. OBJECTIVES: (II.a) Are stroke survivors who train with the assistance of a robot at an early stage more likely to achieve independent walking? (II.b) Does additional robot-assisted training modulate the recovery of standing and walking ability by enhancing behavioral restitution?

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

SINGLE

Enrollment

Conditions

Stroke Paresis Gait, Hemiplegic

Interventions

Exoskeleton-assisted gait trainingBEHAVIORAL

In the experimental groups, participants are provided with 1-hour sessions of gait training with robot assistance, 4 times per week for 4 weeks. Assistance is provided by the Ekso GT (Ekso Bionics, Richmond, CA, USA), an exoskeleton consisting of fitted metal braces that supports the legs, feet, and trunk of the patient. Powered motors drive knee and hip joints in the sagittal plane to assist during standing up and walking over level surfaces. Steps are initiated if an active weight-shift towards the stance leg is performed by the patient. The provided assistance in stance and swing is adaptable to the patient's ability and can be adjusted for each leg separately.

Eligibility

Sex: ALLMin age: 18 YearsMax age: 80 Years

Medical Language ↔ Plain English

Inclusion Criteria: * First-ever, MRI- or CT-confirmed, ischemic or hemorrhagic, anterior circulation stroke * Age: 18 - 90 years * Baseline assessments within the first 14 days after stroke onset * Unable to walk independently at baseline (FAC \<3) * Moderate to severe weakness of the lower limb at baseline (MI \</=75) * Pre-morbid independence in activities of daily living (mRS \</=2) and gait (FAC \>3) * Able to communicate and comprehend * Sufficient motivation to participate * Provided a written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * No other neurological condition affecting motor functions of the lower limbs * Pre-existing musculoskeletal impairment severely affecting the gait pattern * Body weight \> 100 kg * Severe spasticity or contractures that prevent safe use of the exoskeleton * Medically unstable to participate in additional therapy sessions

Locations (3)

GZA Ziekenhuis - campus St Augustinus & Campus St Vincentius

Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium

Antwerp University Hospital

Antwerp, Belgium

RevArte Rehabilitation Hospital

Antwerp, Belgium

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change on the Fugl Meyer motor assessment - subscale lower extremity (FM-LE)

This scale measures the level of of volitional, selective control of muscles of the paretic lower limb. Scoring: This scale is scored from 0 (no reflex activity) to 34 (volitional movement out of synergies).

Time frame: Longitudinal change is determined between the following time points: Baseline (0-1 week post-stroke), 3 weeks post-stroke, 5 weeks post-stroke, 8 weeks post-stroke, 12 weeks post-stroke, 24 weeks post-stroke

Secondary Outcomes

Trunk Control Test - item sitting balance

Sitting balance is part of the prognostic model used to stratify patients at baseline. Scoring: 0 - 1 (able to sit independently without support of the legs or trunk 30 seconds)

Time frame: Baseline (0-1 week post-stroke)

Motricity Index - subscale lower extremity (MI-LE)

Strength of major muscle groups of the paretic lower limb is assessed. At baseline this is part of the prognostic model used to stratify patients. Scoring: This scale is scored from 0 (no muscle activity) to 99 (normal strength over full range of motion in hip flexors, knee extensors and ankle dorsiflexors).

Time frame: Baseline (0-1 week post-stroke), 3 weeks post-stroke, 5 weeks post-stroke, 8 weeks post-stroke, 12 weeks post-stroke, 24 weeks post-stroke

Berg Balance Scale - item standing unsupported

This item of the BBS indicates the ability to stand independently and therefore reflects the process of functional walking recovery within the first 6 months post-stroke. Scoring: This scale includes 5 levels (0-4), ranging from "unable to stand 30 seconds unassisted" (0) to "able to stand safely 2 minutes" (5).

Time frame: Baseline (0-1 week post-stroke), 3 weeks post-stroke, 5 weeks post-stroke, 8 weeks post-stroke, 12 weeks post-stroke, 24 weeks post-stroke

Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC)

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov

This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.