This study is being done to see which treatment is more effective in improving the difficulty of swallowing. Researchers are comparing self-dilation to endoscopic dilation.
Benign esophageal strictures can be challenging condition to treat. The mainstay of treatment is endoscopic dilations. However, 30 to 40% of these strictures recur despite rigorous dilations. Although a consensus definition does not exist, a stricture is typically termed as a refractory benign esophageal stricture (RBES), when there is a failure to maintain luminal patency after at least 5 endoscopic dilations. Patients with RBES are extremely difficult to manage and the current armamentarium includes repeated endoscopic dilations, corticosteroid or mitomycin C injections, incisional therapy, and/ or temporary stent placement. These procedures are costly, their efficacy can be short-lived, and are associated with great burden both for the patient and clinician. Esophageal self -dilation therapy (ESDT) is where the patient learns to pass a polyvinyl dilator orally on a routine basis. In past, smaller studies, ESDT appears to be effective for RBES, reducing the number of endoscopic dilations from an average of 21.7 to an average of 1.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
26
Patient learns to pass a polyvinyl dilator orally on a routine basis. Teaching will take over 1-3 training sessions by one of two esophageal physicians and a nurse. Patients will be instructed to start Esophageal self dilation therapy twice a day for at least one week.
A long, flexible tube is inserted down the throat into the esophagus and the narrow area of the esophagus is dilated, or stretched.
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Number of Endoscopic Interventions
Number of endoscopies required in a 6 month interval in subjects who achieved at least a 10-12 mm esophageal diameter during serial dilation for refractory benign esophageal stricture (RBES) and were subsequently treated with ESDT versus standard clinical care
Time frame: 6 months following serial dilation
Length of Days Intervention Free
Number of days from start of study participation to 1st endoscopic intervention for recurrent dysphagia
Time frame: 6 months
Mayo Dysphagia Questionnaire (MDQ-30) at Baseline
The MDQ-30 provides a series of questions for patients regarding their swallowing difficulties over the past 30 days. Participants were asked to rate the severity of their troubles swallowing on a scale of 0 to 10; 0 being "Not at all severe" and 10 being "Very severe"
Time frame: Baseline
Mayo Dysphagia Questionnaire (MDQ-30) at 12 Months
The MDQ-30 provides a series of questions for patients regarding their swallowing difficulties over the past 30 days. Participants were asked to rate the severity of their troubles swallowing on a scale of 0 to 10; 0 being "Not at all severe" and 10 being "Very severe"
Time frame: 12 months
Clinically Significant Adverse Events
Number of clinically significant adverse events including perforation, bleeding and pain
Time frame: 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.