The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of treatment with carboplatin/paclitaxel\* PLUS pembrolizumab (MK-3475) and maintenance olaparib (MK-7339) in women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), fallopian tube cancer, or primary peritoneal cancer. The primary study hypotheses are that the combination of pembrolizumab plus carboplatin/paclitaxel\* followed by continued pembrolizumab and maintenance olaparib is superior to carboplatin/paclitaxel alone with respect to Progression Free Survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) in participants with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) positive tumors (Combined Positive Score \[CPS\]≥10) and in all participants, and that the combination of pembrolizumab plus carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by continued pembrolizumab is superior to carboplatin/paclitaxel alone with respect to PFS per RECIST 1.1 in participants with PD-L1 positive tumors (CPS≥10) and in all participants.
Following a lead-in period during which all participants receive a single 3-week cycle of carboplatin/paclitaxel\*, participants will be randomly assigned in to one of three treatment arms, and will receive carboplatin/paclitaxel\* for 5 cycles plus: * Pembrolizumab + Olaparib * Pembrolizumab + Placebo for Olaparib * Placebo for Pembrolizumab + Placebo for Olaparib * At Investigator's discretion and prior to participant randomization, one of the following carboplatin/paclitaxel regimens is to be selected: 1. up to 5 cycles of carboplatin Area Under the Curve (AUC)5 or AUC6 AND paclitaxel 175 mg/m\^2 on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle 2. up to 5 cycles of carboplatin AUC5 or AUC6 on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle AND paclitaxel 80 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 8 and 15 of each 3-week cycle; or 3. up to 5 cycles of carboplatin AUC2 or AUC2.7 AND paclitaxel 60 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 8 and 15 of each 3-week cycle. Docetaxel may be considered for participants who experience either a severe hypersensitivity reaction to paclitaxel or an AE requiring discontinuation of paclitaxel only after consultation with the Sponsor. The recommended dose as determined by the Scottish Gynaecological Cancer Trials Group is Docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 Q3W plus carboplatin AUC 5 Q3W.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
1,367
IV infusion
IV infusion
IV infusion
IV infusion
Oral tablet
Oral tablet
IV infusion
IV infusion
University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) ( Site 0036)
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
University of Arizona Cancer Center ( Site 0074)
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Disney Family Cancer Center ( Site 0042)
Burbank, California, United States
Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trial -Oakland ( Site 0077)
Oakland, California, United States
Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials-Roseville ( Site 0084)
Roseville, California, United States
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Assessed by the Investigator in Participants With Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Positive Tumors (Combined Positive Score [CPS]≥10)
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) per RECIST 1.1 based on Investigator assessment or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions and the unequivocal progression of non-target lesions is also considered PD. The PFS per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the Investigator will be reported for participants with PD-L1 positive tumors (CPS≥10). PFS was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data.
Time frame: Up to approximately 67 months
PFS Per RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by the Investigator in All Participants
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) per RECIST 1.1 based on Investigator assessment or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions and the unequivocal progression of non-target lesions is also considered PD. The PFS per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the Investigator will be reported for all participants. PFS was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data.
Time frame: Up to approximately 67 months
Overall Survival (OS) in Participants With PD-L1 Positive Tumors (CPS ≥ 10)
OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to death due to any cause. The OS is reported for all participants with PD-L1 positive tumors (CPS≥10). The OS was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data.
Time frame: Up to approximately 67 months
OS in All Participants
OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to death due to any cause. The OS was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data.
Time frame: Up to approximately 67 months
PFS Per RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in Participants With PD-L1 Positive Tumors (CPS≥10)
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression per RECIST 1.1 based on blinded independent central review assessment or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions and the unequivocal progression of non-target lesions is also considered PD. The PFS per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by blinded independent central review will be reported for participants with PD-L1 positive (CPS≥10) tumors (CPS≥10). PFS was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data.
Time frame: Up to approximately 66 months
PFS Per RECIST 1.1 as Assessed by BICR in All Participants
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease progression per RECIST 1.1 based on blinded independent central review assessment or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions and the unequivocal progression of non-target lesions is also considered PD. The PFS per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by blinded independent central review will be reported for all participants. PFS was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data.
Time frame: Up to approximately 66 months
PFS After Second-line Treatment (PFS2) Following Discontinuation of Study Treatment as Assessed by the Investigator in Participants With PD-L1 Positive Tumors (CPS≥10)
PFS2 is defined as the time from randomization until PD after second-line treatment per RECIST 1.1 based on Investigator assessment, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions and the unequivocal progression of non-target lesions is also considered PD. The PFS2 per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the Investigator is reported for participants with PD-L1 positive tumors (CPS≥10). PFS2 was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data.
Time frame: Up to approximately 67 months
PFS2 Following Discontinuation of Study Treatment as Assessed by the Investigator in All Participants
PFS2 is defined as the time from randomization until PD after second-line treatment per RECIST 1.1 based on Investigator assessment, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD is defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Note: The appearance of one or more new lesions and the unequivocal progression of non-target lesions is also considered PD. The PFS2 per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the Investigator is reported for all participants. PFS2 was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data.
Time frame: Up to approximately 67 months
Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (Item 29) and Quality of Life (Item 30) (GHS/QoL) Combined Score
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to the Global Health Status (GHS) question "How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" (Item 29) and the Quality of Life (QoL) question "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?" (Item 30) were scored on a 7-point scale (1=Very Poor; 7=Excellent). Using linear transformation, raw scores were standardized so scores ranged from 0 to 100; higher score = better outcome. Change from baseline to Week 45 in EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 29 and 30 combined scores was calculated based on a constrained longitudinal data analysis (cLDA) with scores as response variable; covariates for treatment by time interaction and stratification factors (debulking surgery \[planned interval vs R0 following primary vs R1 following primary\], and bevacizumab use \[Yes vs No\], and PD-L1 CPS \[\<10 vs ≥10\]).
Time frame: Baseline and week 45
Mean Change From Baseline in Abdominal and Gastrointestinal (Abdominal/GI) Symptoms Score Using the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Ovarian Cancer (QLQ-OV28) Abdominal/GI Symptom Scale
Participant responses to 6 questions from the EORTC QoL Questionnaire-Ovarian Cancer (QLQ-OV28) abdominal/GI symptom scale about abdominal pain, bloated feeling in abdomen/stomach, changes in clothing fit, changes in bowel habit, flatulence, and stomach fullness when eating (questions 31-36) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all; 4=Very much); lower score = better abdominal/GI symptoms. Using linear transformation, raw scores were standardized so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a lower score indicating a better overall outcome. Change from baseline to Week 45 in EORTC QLQ-OV28 Items 31-36 combined scores was calculated based on a constrained longitudinal data analysis (cLDA) model with scores as response variable; covariates for treatment by time interaction and stratification factors (debulking surgery \[planned interval vs R0 following primary vs R1 following primary\], and bevacizumab use \[Yes vs No\], and PD-L1 CPS \[\<10 vs ≥10\]).
Time frame: Baseline and week 45
Time to Deterioration (TTD) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (Item 29) and Quality of Life (Item 30) Combined Score
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to the Global Health Status (GHS) question "How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" (Item 29) and the Quality of Life (QoL) question "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?" (Item 30) were scored on a 7-point scale (1=Very Poor; 7=Excellent). Using linear transformation, raw scores were standardized so scores ranged from 0 to 100; higher score = better outcome. TTD is defined as the time from the first EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 29 and 30 combined scores to deterioration (defined as ≥10-point decrease in GHS/QoL score from baseline with confirmation under right-censoring rule \[the last observation\]) or death, whichever occurs first. TTD was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data.
Time frame: Up to approximately 31 months
Time to Deterioration (TTD) of Abdominal/GI Symptoms Using EORTC QLQ-OV28
Participant responses to 6 questions from the EORTC QoL Questionnaire-Ovarian Cancer (QLQ-OV28) abdominal/GI symptom scale about abdominal pain, bloated feeling in abdomen/stomach, changes in clothing fit, changes in bowel habit, flatulence, and stomach fullness when eating (questions 31-36) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all; 4=Very much); lower score = better abdominal/GI symptoms. Using linear transformation, raw scores were standardized so that scores ranged from 0 to 100; a lower score indicating a better overall outcome. TTD is defined as the time from the first EORTC QLQ-OV28 questions 31-36 combined scores to deterioration (defined as ≥10-point decrease in abdominal/GI symptoms score from baseline with confirmation under right-censoring rule \[the last observation\]) or death, whichever occurs first. TTD was calculated using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data.
Time frame: Up to approximately 31 months
Time to First Subsequent Anti-cancer Treatment (TFST) in Participants With PD-L1 Positive Tumors (CPS≥10)
TFST is defined as the time from randomization to initiation of first subsequent anti-cancer treatment or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. The TFST was determined from the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data.
Time frame: Up to approximately 67 months
Time to First Subsequent Anti-cancer Treatment (TFST) in All Participants
TFST is defined as the time from randomization to initiation of first subsequent anti-cancer treatment or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. The TFST was determined from the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data.
Time frame: Up to approximately 67 months
Time to Second Subsequent Anti-cancer Treatment (TSST) in Participants With PD-L1 Positive Tumors (CPS≥10)
TSST is defined as the time from randomization to initiation of second subsequent anti-cancer treatment or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. The TSST was determined from the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data.
Time frame: Up to approximately 67 months
Time to Second Subsequent Anti-cancer Treatment (TSST) in All Participants
TSST is defined as the time from randomization to initiation of second subsequent anti-cancer treatment or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. The TSST was determined from the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data.
Time frame: Up to approximately 67 months
Time to Discontinuation of Study Treatment or Death (TDT) in Participants With PD-L1 Positive Tumors (CPS≥10)
TDT is defined as the time from the date of randomization to discontinuation of study treatment or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. The TDT was determined from the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data.
Time frame: Up to approximately 67 months
Time to Discontinuation of Study Treatment or Death (TDT) in All Participants
TDT is defined as the time from the date of randomization to discontinuation of study treatment or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. The TDT was determined from the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data.
Time frame: Up to approximately 67 months
Pathological Complete Response (pCR) Rate in Participants With PD-L1 Positive Tumors (CPS≥10)
pCR is defined as the disappearance of all known disease noted prior to surgery; all surgical specimens collected during the interval debulking surgery are microscopically negative for malignancy. The percentage of participants who experience pCR was determined based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method stratified by Bevacizumab use (yes versus no).
Time frame: Up to approximately 21 months
Pathological Complete Response (pCR) Rate in All Participants
pCR is defined as the disappearance of all known disease noted prior to surgery; all surgical specimens collected during the interval debulking surgery are microscopically negative for malignancy. The percentage of participants who experience pCR was determined based on Miettinen \& Nurminen method stratified by Bevacizumab use (yes versus no) and PD-L1 status (CPS \<10 versus CPS\>=10).
Time frame: Up to approximately 26 months
Number of Participants Who Experience an Adverse Event (AE)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. The number of participants who experience an AE will be reported.
Time frame: Up to approximately 73 months (anticipated)
Number of Participants Who Discontinue Study Treatment Due to an AE
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. The number of participants who discontinue study intervention due to an AE will be reported.
Time frame: Up to approximately 6 years (anticipated)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials-Sacramento ( Site 0083)
Sacramento, California, United States
Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trial - San Francisco ( Site 0078)
San Francisco, California, United States
Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trial - Santa Clara ( Site 0079)
Santa Clara, California, United States
Kaiser Permanente N. CA Regional Oncology Clinical Trials ( Site 0008)
Vallejo, California, United States
Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trial - Walnut Creek ( Site 0080)
Walnut Creek, California, United States
...and 217 more locations