Ever-evolving prosthetic activity as described in a Swedish study that predicts 469 TKA per 10,000 inhabitants in 2130. Increased consultation of controls and post-arthroplasty follow-up is expected. There is a legal obligation to ensure long-term follow-up without official recommendation on follow-up procedures. The objective is to compare a consultation + Xray by the surgeon versus an Xray and a questionnaire completed by the patient who had a knee or hip replacement. This is to demonstrate the equivalence of both. All patients who come back for an annual check of a prosthesis should complete this questionnaire and perform an X-ray of their prosthesis. The study lasts one year and includes all the patients with a previous knee or hip arthroplasty. The result of the questionnaire and Xray will be compared to that of the consultation and Xray.
An english study published an article showing that a follow up by questionnaire versus a consultation was also effective. For this study, investigator is going to take back all the patients having to return to consultation in 2017. . Normally at 3 months, 1, 3, 5, 10, 15 and 20 years post-operatively. Thus investigator will be able to see the number of patients seen in consultation compared to the theoretical number The purpose of this study is to highlight the non-inferiority of the questionnaire compared to the consultation for screening for complications at 10 years. If this proves to be the case, only complicating patients could be reviewed by calling them to the radio and their questionnaire.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
656
questionnaire and Xray for all patients
Chu Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, France
Patients seen in consultation follow-up or not (yes / no).
Feasibility study of a new strategy of follow-up by questionnaire
Time frame: at 3 months
Patients seen in consultation follow-up or not (yes / no).
Feasibility study of a new strategy of follow-up by questionnaire
Time frame: at 1year
Patients seen in consultation follow-up or not (yes / no).
Feasibility study of a new strategy of follow-up by questionnaire
Time frame: at 3 years
Patients seen in consultation follow-up or not (yes / no).
Feasibility study of a new strategy of follow-up by questionnaire
Time frame: at 5 years
Patients seen in consultation follow-up or not (yes / no).
Feasibility study of a new strategy of follow-up by questionnaire
Time frame: at 10 years
Patients seen in consultation follow-up or not (yes / no).
Feasibility study of a new strategy of follow-up by questionnaire
Time frame: at 15 years
Patients seen in consultation follow-up or not (yes / no).
Feasibility study of a new strategy of follow-up by questionnaire
Time frame: at 20 years
economic impact (Number of working day)
Number of working day in days
Time frame: at 3 months, 1, 3, 5, 10, 15 and 20 years post-operatively.
economic impact (Number of consultations)
Number of consultations with the surgeon,
Time frame: at 3 months, 1, 3, 5, 10, 15 and 20 years post-operatively.
economic impact (Number of radiography)
Number of radiography realized by the patient
Time frame: at 3 months, 1, 3, 5, 10, 15 and 20 years post-operatively.
economic impact (Cost phone call)
According to the number of realized phone call
Time frame: at 3 months, 1, 3, 5, 10, 15 and 20 years post-operatively.
Evaluation of the feasibility of the questionnaire for detection of certain complications
Evaluation of the feasibility of the questionnaire method
Time frame: at 3 months, 1, 3, 5, 10, 15 and 20 years post-operatively.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.