Study of Relugolix With Estradiol and Norethindrone Acetate in Women With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Associated With Uterine Fibroids

Time To MBL Volume ≥80 mL During The Randomized Treatment Period

MBL volume is measured using the alkaline hematin method. The method involves pummeling used feminine products in a 5% sodium hydroxide solution, which leads to the conversion of hemoglobin to alkaline hematin. The volume of MBL is measured in mL and a blood loss of 80 mL or more per cycle is considered diagnostic of heavy menstrual bleeding.

Time frame: From Week 52/Baseline through Week 104

Percentage Of Participants Who Maintained MBL Volume Of <80 mL At Week 104 During The Randomized Treatment Period

MBL volume is measured using the alkaline hematin method. The method involves pummeling used feminine products in a 5% sodium hydroxide solution, which leads to the conversion of hemoglobin to alkaline hematin. The volume of MBL is measured in mL and a blood loss of 80 mL or more per cycle is considered diagnostic of heavy menstrual bleeding. The sustained responder rate was calculated as the Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative probability of MBL volume \< 80 mL through Week 104 using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline up to Week 104

Percentage Of Participants Achieving Or Maintaining Amenorrhea At Week 76 During The Randomized Treatment Period

Assessed using participant daily diary and MBL volume measured using the alkaline hematin method. Participants were deemed to be amenorrhoeic if one of the following criteria was met: No feminine products returned due to reported amenorrhea, or No feminine products returned due to reported spotting or feminine product collection with a negligible observed MBL volume (\<5 mL) coupled with other data indicating infrequent non-cyclic bleeding/spotting. If no feminine product collection because participant failed to collect used products per protocol or due to "Other" reason, the amenorrhea status was set to missing. Missing responses for menstrual bleeding questions in the paper diary were treated as "No Bleeding" if paper diary entry/compliance rate was \>70%.

Time frame: Week 76

Change From Week 52/Baseline To Week 76 In MBL Volume During The Randomized Treatment Period

MBL volume is measured using the alkaline hematin method. The method involves pummeling used feminine products in a 5% sodium hydroxide solution, which leads to the conversion of hemoglobin to alkaline hematin. Participants with amenorrhea are assigned with an MBL value of 0 mL and participants with spotting are assigned with an MBL value of 4.99 mL. The volume of MBL is measured in mL and a blood loss of 80 mL or more per cycle is considered diagnostic of heavy menstrual bleeding.

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline to Week 76

Change From Week 52/Baseline To Week 104 In MBL Volume During The Randomized Treatment Period

MBL volume is measured using the alkaline hematin method. The method involves pummeling used feminine products in a 5% sodium hydroxide solution, which leads to the conversion of hemoglobin to alkaline hematin. Participants with amenorrhea are assigned with an MBL value of 0 mL and participants with spotting are assigned with an MBL value of 4.99 mL. The volume of MBL is measured in mL and a blood loss of 80 mL or more per cycle is considered diagnostic of heavy menstrual bleeding.

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline to Week 104

Percentage Change From Week 52/Baseline To Week 76 In MBL Volume During The Randomized Treatment Period

MBL volume is measured using the alkaline hematin method. The method involves pummeling used feminine products in a 5% sodium hydroxide solution, which leads to the conversion of hemoglobin to alkaline hematin. Participants with amenorrhea are assigned with an MBL value of 0 mL and participants with spotting are assigned with an MBL value of 4.99 mL. The volume of MBL is measured in mL and a blood loss of 80 mL or more per cycle is considered diagnostic of heavy menstrual bleeding.

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline to Week 76

Percentage Change From Week 52/Baseline To Week 104 In MBL Volume During The Randomized Treatment Period

MBL volume is measured using the alkaline hematin method. The method involves pummeling used feminine products in a 5% sodium hydroxide solution, which leads to the conversion of hemoglobin to alkaline hematin. Participants with amenorrhea are assigned with an MBL value of 0 mL and participants with spotting are assigned with an MBL value of 4.99 mL. The volume of MBL is measured in mL and a blood loss of 80 mL or more per cycle is considered diagnostic of heavy menstrual bleeding.

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline to Week 104

Percentage Of Participants Achieving Or Maintaining Amenorrhea At Week 104 During The Randomized Treatment Period

Assessed using participant daily diary and MBL volume measured using the alkaline hematin method. Participants were deemed to be amenorrhoeic if one of the following criteria was met: No feminine products returned due to reported amenorrhea or no feminine products returned due to reported spotting or feminine product collection with a negligible observed MBL volume (\<5 mL) coupled with other data indicating infrequent non-cyclic bleeding/spotting. If no feminine product collection because participant failed to collect used products per protocol or due to "Other" reason, the amenorrhea status was set to missing. Missing responses for menstrual bleeding questions in the paper diary were treated as "No Bleeding" if paper diary entry/compliance rate was \>70%.

Time frame: Week 104

Percentage Of Participants Who Responded (MBL Volume <80 mL) To Retreatment During The Retreatment Period

MBL volume is measured using the alkaline hematin method. The method involves pummeling used feminine products in a 5% sodium hydroxide solution, which leads to the conversion of hemoglobin to alkaline hematin. The volume of MBL is measured in mL and a blood loss of 80 mL or more per cycle is considered diagnostic of heavy menstrual bleeding.

Time frame: From Initiation of Retreatment to Week 104

Percentage Of Participants Whose Menses Had Resumed During The Randomized Treatment Period

Participants who were previously amenorrhoeic were deemed to resume menses according to the following rules: MBL volume of collected feminine product was ≥5 mL; MBL volume of collected feminine product was \<5 mL; however, there were more than 5 days and more than 3 consecutive days of bleeding with feminine product use during the visit; no feminine products were returned because the participant failed to collect used products per protocol; however, there were more than 5 days and more than 3 consecutive days of bleeding with feminine product use during the visit; or no feminine products were returned due to other reasons that indicated menstruation had occurred; also, there were more than 5 days and more than 3 consecutive days of bleeding with feminine product use during the visit.

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline to Week 76 and Week 104

Time To Resumption Of Menses For Participants Who Were Amenorrhoeic At Week 52/Baseline During The Randomized Treatment Period

Assessed using participant daily diary. Participants were deemed to be amenorrhoeic if one of the following criteria was met: No feminine products returned due to reported amenorrhea, or No feminine products returned due to reported spotting or feminine product collection with a negligible observed MBL volume (\<5 mL) coupled with other data indicating infrequent non-cyclic bleeding/spotting. If no feminine product collection because participant failed to collect used products per protocol or due to "Other" reason, the amenorrhea status was set to missing. Missing responses for menstrual bleeding questions in the paper diary were treated as "No Bleeding" if paper diary entry/compliance rate was \>70%.

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline up to Week 104

Change From Week 52/Baseline In Hemoglobin Concentration During The Randomized Treatment Period

Blood samples were collected from participants for hemoglobin measurements in accordance with the specified time points.

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline to Week 76

Change From Week 52/Baseline In Hemoglobin Concentration During The Randomized Treatment Period

Blood samples were collected from participants for hemoglobin measurements in accordance with the specified time points.

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline to Week 104

Percentage Of Participants With MBL Volume Of ≥80 mL At Week 76 And Week 104 During the Randomized Treatment Period

MBL volume is measured using the alkaline hematin method. The method involves pummeling used feminine products in a 5% sodium hydroxide solution, which leads to the conversion of hemoglobin to alkaline hematin. The volume of MBL is measured in mL and a blood loss of 80 mL or more per cycle is considered diagnostic of heavy menstrual bleeding.

Time frame: From Week 52/Baseline to Week 76 and Week 104

Percent Change From Week 52/Baseline In Hemoglobin Concentration During The Randomized Treatment Period

Blood samples were collected from participants for hemoglobin measurements in accordance with the specified time points.

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline to Week 64

Percent Change From Week 52/Baseline In Hemoglobin Concentration During The Randomized Treatment Period

Blood samples were collected from participants for hemoglobin measurements in accordance with the specified time points.

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline to Week 76

Percent Change From Week 52/Baseline In Hemoglobin Concentration During The Randomized Treatment Period

Blood samples were collected from participants for hemoglobin measurements in accordance with the specified time points.

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline to Week 104

Percentage Of Participants Who Had Hemoglobin Level ≤10.5 g/dL Over Time During The Randomized Treatment Period

Blood samples were collected from participants for hemoglobin measurements in accordance with the specified time points.

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline to Week 76

Percentage Of Participants Who Had Hemoglobin Level ≤10.5 g/dL Over Time During The Randomized Treatment Period

Blood samples were collected from participants for hemoglobin measurements in accordance with the specified time points.

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline to Week 104

Percentage Of Participants Who Had Hemoglobin Level <11.6 g/dL Over Time During The Randomized Treatment Period

Blood samples were collected from participants for hemoglobin measurements in accordance with the specified time points.

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline to Week 76

Percentage Of Participants Who Had Hemoglobin Level <11.6 g/dL Over Time During The Randomized Treatment Period

Blood samples were collected from participants for hemoglobin measurements in accordance with the specified time points.

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline to Week 104

Change From Week 52/Baseline In Short Form 36v2 (SF-36v2) Domain During The Randomized Treatment Period

The Short-Form Health Survey Standard (SF-36) is a validated, 36-item questionnaire, assessing general overall quality of life and was completed by participants on paper before other study procedures were performed, except for at the Week 52/Baseline visit, which was completed after eligibility for this study was confirmed and all Week 52 procedures for the long-term extension study were completed. Scores are calculated for each domain and 2 summary scores - a physical component summary score (Domains \[number of items\]: Physical Functioning \[10\], Role-Physical \[4\], Bodily Pain \[2\], General Health \[5\]), a mental component summary score (Domains \[number of items\]: Vitality \[4\], Social Functioning \[2\], Role-Emotional \[3\], and Mental Health \[5\]), and reported Health Transition \[1\]. Individual domain and component summary scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate higher health-related quality of life.

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline to Week 76

Change From Week 52/Baseline In Short Form 36v2 (SF-36v2) Domain During The Randomized Treatment Period

The Short-Form Health Survey Standard (SF-36) is a validated, 36-item questionnaire, assessing general overall quality of life and was completed by participants on paper before other study procedures were performed, except for at the Week 52/Baseline visit, which was completed after eligibility for this study was confirmed and all Week 52 procedures for the long-term extension study were completed. Scores are calculated for each domain and 2 summary scores - a physical component summary score (Domains \[number of items\]: Physical Functioning \[10\], Role-Physical \[4\], Bodily Pain \[2\], General Health \[5\]), a mental component summary score (Domains \[number of items\]: Vitality \[4\], Social Functioning \[2\], Role-Emotional \[3\], and Mental Health \[5\]), and reported Health Transition \[1\]. Individual domain and component summary scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate higher health-related quality of life.

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline to Week 104

Change From Week 52/Baseline In SF-36v2 Summary Component Scores During The Randomized Treatment Period

The Short-Form Health Survey Standard (SF-36) is a validated, 36-item questionnaire, assessing general overall quality of life and was completed by participants on paper before other study procedures were performed, except for at the Week 52/Baseline visit, which was completed after eligibility for this study was confirmed and all Week 52 procedures for the long-term extension study were completed. Scores are calculated for each domain and 2 summary scores - a physical component summary (PCS) score (Domains \[number of items\]: Physical Functioning \[10\], Role-Physical \[4\], Bodily Pain \[2\], General Health \[5\]), a mental component summary (MCS) score (Domains \[number of items\]: Vitality \[4\], Social Functioning \[2\], Role-Emotional \[3\], and Mental Health \[5\]), and reported Health Transition \[1\]. Individual domain and component summary scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate higher health-related quality of life.

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline to Week 76

Change From Week 52/Baseline In SF-36v2 Summary Component Scores During The Randomized Treatment Period

The Short-Form Health Survey Standard (SF-36) is a validated, 36-item questionnaire, assessing general overall quality of life and was completed by participants on paper before other study procedures were performed, except for at the Week 52/Baseline visit, which was completed after eligibility for this study was confirmed and all Week 52 procedures for the long-term extension study were completed. Scores are calculated for each domain and 2 summary scores - a physical component summary (PCS) score (Domains \[number of items\]: Physical Functioning \[10\], Role-Physical \[4\], Bodily Pain \[2\], General Health \[5\]), a mental component summary (MCS) score (Domains \[number of items\]: Vitality \[4\], Social Functioning \[2\], Role-Emotional \[3\], and Mental Health \[5\]), and reported Health Transition \[1\]. Individual domain and component summary scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate higher health-related quality of life.

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline to Week 104

Categorical Change From Week 52/Baseline In PGA For Uterine Fibroid-related Function During The Randomized Treatment Period

The PGA for function is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participant's impression of the impact on their function related to uterine fibroids affected their usual activities and was completed on paper. The PGA for function was evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = No limitation at all; 5 = Extreme limitation) with higher numbers representing worse results. Endpoint values represent the worsening of function (deterioration), improvement of function (improvement), or no change by category at each time point. For example, a 4-category deterioration represents a change from 1 (No limitation at all) to 5 (Extreme limitation) and a 4-category improvement represents a change from 5 (Extreme limitation) to 1 (No limitation at all).

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline to Week 76

Categorical Change From Week 52/Baseline In PGA For Uterine Fibroid-related Function During The Randomized Treatment Period

The PGA for function is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participant's impression of the impact on their function related to uterine fibroids affected their usual activities and was completed on paper. The PGA for function was evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = No limitation at all; 5 = Extreme limitation) with higher numbers representing worse results. Endpoint values represent the worsening of function (deterioration), improvement of function (improvement), or no change by category at each time point. For example, a 4-category deterioration represents a change from 1 (No limitation at all) to 5 (Extreme limitation) and a 4-category improvement represents a change from 5 (Extreme limitation) to 1 (No limitation at all).

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline to Week 104

Categorical Change From Week 52/Baseline In PGA For Uterine Fibroid-related Symptoms During The Randomized Treatment Period

The PGA for symptoms is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participant's impression of the severity of their symptoms related to uterine fibroids and was completed on paper. The PGA for symptoms was evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Not severe; 5 = Extremely severe) with higher numbers representing worse results. Endpoint values represent the worsening of symptoms (deterioration), improvement of symptoms (improvement), or no change by category at each time point. For example, a 4-category deterioration represents a change from 1 (Not severe) to 5 (Extremely severe) and a 4-category improvement represents a change from 5 (Extremely severe) to 1 (Not severe).

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline to Week 76

Categorical Change From Week 52/Baseline In PGA For Uterine Fibroid-related Symptoms During The Randomized Treatment Period

The PGA for symptoms is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participant's impression of the severity of their symptoms related to uterine fibroids and was completed on paper. The PGA for symptoms was evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Not severe; 5 = Extremely severe) with higher numbers representing worse results. Endpoint values represent the worsening of symptoms (deterioration), improvement of symptoms (improvement), or no change by category at each time point. For example, a 4-category deterioration represents a change from 1 (Not severe) to 5 (Extremely severe) and a 4-category improvement represents a change from 5 (Extremely severe) to 1 (Not severe).

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline to Week 104

Change From Week 52/Baseline In The Work Productivity Activity Impairment - Percent Work Time Missed Due to Uterine Fibroids (WPAI-UF) Scores During The Randomized Treatment Period

The WPAI-UF is a validated instrument used to measure self-reported absenteeism, presenteeism, and daily activity impairment attributed to uterine fibroids. The WPAI-UF was to be completed on a paper questionnaire and participants were to answer these questions. Percent work time missed due to uterine fibroids was calculated from hours missed due to uterine fibroids divided by the sum of hours missed due to uterine fibroids plus hours actually worked. This value was then multiplied by 100 to get a percentage. The WPAI-UF outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity due to uterine fibroids, that is, worse outcomes.

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline up to Week 76

Change From Week 52/Baseline In The Work Productivity Activity Impairment - Percent Work Time Missed Due to Uterine Fibroids (WPAI-UF) Scores During The Randomized Treatment Period

The WPAI-UF is a validated instrument used to measure self-reported absenteeism, presenteeism, and daily activity impairment attributed to uterine fibroids. The WPAI-UF was to be completed on a paper questionnaire and participants were to answer these questions. Percent work time missed due to uterine fibroids was calculated from hours missed due to uterine fibroids divided by the sum of hours missed due to uterine fibroids plus hours actually worked. This value was then multiplied by 100 to get a percentage. The WPAI-UF outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity due to uterine fibroids, that is, worse outcomes.

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline up to Week 104

Change From Week 52/Baseline In The Work Productivity Activity Impairment - Percent Impairment While Working Due to Uterine Fibroids (WPAI-UF) Scores During The Randomized Treatment Period

The WPAI-UF is a validated instrument used to measure self-reported absenteeism, presenteeism, and daily activity impairment attributed to uterine fibroids. The WPAI-UF was to be completed on a paper questionnaire and participants were to answer these questions. Percent impairment while working due to uterine fibroid symptoms was calculated by taking the reported value from 1 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented work) and dividing by 10. This value was then multiplied by 100 to get a percentage. The WPAI-UF outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity due to uterine fibroids, that is, worse outcomes.

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline up to Week 76

Change From Week 52/Baseline In The Work Productivity Activity Impairment - Percent Impairment While Working Due to Uterine Fibroids (WPAI-UF) Scores During The Randomized Treatment Period

The WPAI-UF is a validated instrument used to measure self-reported absenteeism, presenteeism, and daily activity impairment attributed to uterine fibroids. The WPAI-UF was to be completed on a paper questionnaire and participants were to answer these questions. Percent impairment while working due to uterine fibroid symptoms was calculated by taking the reported value from 1 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented work) and dividing by 10. This value was then multiplied by 100 to get a percentage. The WPAI-UF outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity due to uterine fibroids, that is, worse outcomes.

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline up to Week 104

Change From Week 52/Baseline In The Work Productivity Activity Impairment - Percent Overall Work Impairment Due to Uterine Fibroids (WPAI-UF) Scores During The Randomized Treatment Period

The WPAI-UF is a validated instrument used to measure self-reported absenteeism, presenteeism, and daily activity impairment attributed to uterine fibroids. The WPAI-UF was to be completed on a paper questionnaire and participants were to answer these questions. Percent overall work impairment due to uterine fibroid symptoms was calculated from the work time missed due to uterine fibroids plus the value calculated from 1 minus the work time missed value multiplied by the value for impairment while working due to uterine fibroids. This value was then multiplied by 100 to get a percentage. The WPAI-UF outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity due to uterine fibroids, that is, worse outcomes.

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline up to Week 76

Change From Week 52/Baseline In The Work Productivity Activity Impairment - Percent Overall Work Impairment Due to Uterine Fibroids (WPAI-UF) Scores During The Randomized Treatment Period

The WPAI-UF is a validated instrument used to measure self-reported absenteeism, presenteeism, and daily activity impairment attributed to uterine fibroids. The WPAI-UF was to be completed on a paper questionnaire and participants were to answer these questions. Percent overall work impairment due to uterine fibroid symptoms was calculated from the work time missed due to uterine fibroids plus the value calculated from 1 minus the work time missed value multiplied by the value for impairment while working due to uterine fibroids. This value was then multiplied by 100 to get a percentage. The WPAI-UF outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity due to uterine fibroids, that is, worse outcomes.

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline up to Week 104

Change From Week 52/Baseline In The Work Productivity Activity Impairment - Percent Activity Impairment Due to Uterine Fibroids (WPAI-UF) Scores During The Randomized Treatment Period

The WPAI-UF is a validated instrument used to measure self-reported absenteeism, presenteeism, and daily activity impairment attributed to uterine fibroids. The WPAI-UF was to be completed on a paper questionnaire and participants were to answer these questions. Percent activity impairment due to uterine fibroid symptoms was calculated by taking the reported value from 1 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented activity) and dividing by 10. This value was then multiplied by 100 to get a percentage. The WPAI-UF outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity due to uterine fibroids, that is, worse outcomes.

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline up to Week 76

Change From Week 52/Baseline In The Work Productivity Activity Impairment - Percent Activity Impairment Due to Uterine Fibroids (WPAI-UF) Scores During The Randomized Treatment Period

The WPAI-UF is a validated instrument used to measure self-reported absenteeism, presenteeism, and daily activity impairment attributed to uterine fibroids. The WPAI-UF was to be completed on a paper questionnaire and participants were to answer these questions. Percent activity impairment due to uterine fibroid symptoms was calculated by taking the reported value from 1 (no effect) to 10 (completely prevented work) and dividing by 10. This value was then multiplied by 100 to get a percentage. The WPAI-UF outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages (0 to 100%), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity due to uterine fibroids, that is, worse outcomes.

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline up to Week 104

Change From Week 52/Baseline In The UFS-QoL Bleeding And Pelvic Discomfort Score During The Randomized Treatment Period

Assessed using the UFS-QOL which is a validated instrument used to evaluate symptom severity and quality of life in participants with uterine fibroids. The UFS-QoL was completed on a paper questionnaire and participants were to answer the following questions: heavy bleeding during your menstrual period (Question 1), passing blood clots during your menstrual period (Question 2), and feeling tightness or pressure in your pelvic area (Question 5). Items are scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from "not at all" to "a very great deal." A summed score was created for questions 1, 2, and 5 and transformed to a normalized score with a range of possible values from 0 to 100, where a higher score was indicative of greater distress and a lower score of less distress (high scores = bad).

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline to Week 76

Change From Week 52/Baseline In The UFS-QoL Bleeding And Pelvic Discomfort Score During The Randomized Treatment Period

Assessed using the UFS-QOL which is a validated instrument used to evaluate symptom severity and quality of life in participants with uterine fibroids. The UFS-QoL was completed on a paper questionnaire and participants were to answer the following questions: heavy bleeding during your menstrual period (Question 1), passing blood clots during your menstrual period (Question 2), and feeling tightness or pressure in your pelvic area (Question 5). Items are scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from "not at all" to "a very great deal." A summed score was created for questions 1, 2, and 5 and transformed to a normalized score with a range of possible values from 0 to 100, where a higher score was indicative of greater distress and a lower score of less distress (high scores = bad).

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline to Week 104

Original: Change From Week 52/Baseline In The UFS-QoL Symptom Severity Score During The Randomized Treatment Period

Assessed using the UFS-QOL, which is a validated instrument used to evaluate symptom severity and quality of life in participants with uterine fibroids. The UFS-QoL was completed on a paper questionnaire and participants were to answer these questions. Items are scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from "not at all" to "a very great deal." A summed score was created for questions 1 through 8 and transformed to a normalized score with a range of possible values from 0 to 100, where a higher score was indicative of greater symptom severity and a lower score of lower symptom severity (negative score = improvement).

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline to Week 76

New: Change From Week 52/Baseline In The UFS-QoL Symptom Severity Score During The Randomized Treatment Period

Assessed using the UFS-QOL, which is a validated instrument used to evaluate symptom severity and quality of life in participants with uterine fibroids. The UFS-QoL was completed on a paper questionnaire and participants were to answer these questions. Items are scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from "not at all" to "a very great deal." A summed score was created for questions 1 through 8 and transformed to a normalized score with a range of possible values from 0 to 100, where a higher score was indicative of greater symptom severity and a lower score of lower symptom severity (negative score = improvement).

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline to Week 104

Change From Week 52/Baseline In The UFS-QoL Score by Health-Related Quality Of Life Subscale And Total Scores During The Randomized Treatment Period

Assessed using the UFS-QOL which, is a validated instrument used to evaluate symptom severity and quality of life in participants with uterine fibroids. Items are scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from "none of the time" to "all of the time." The UFS-QoL was completed on a paper questionnaire and participants were to answer these questions. Questions 9 through 37 were used to calculate the total scores and the following subscales: concern, activities, revised activities, energy/mood, control, self-conscious, and sexual function. All raw scores are transformed to normalized scores with a range of possible values from 0 to 100. A positive score indicates improvement.

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline to Week 76

Change From Week 52/Baseline In The UFS-QoL Score by Health-Related Quality Of Life Subscale And Total Scores During The Randomized Treatment Period

Assessed using the UFS-QOL which, is a validated instrument used to evaluate symptom severity and quality of life in participants with uterine fibroids. Items are scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from "none of the time" to "all of the time." The UFS-QoL was completed on a paper questionnaire and participants were to answer these questions. Questions 9 through 37 were used to calculate the total scores and the following subscales: concern, activities, revised activities, energy/mood, control, self-conscious, and sexual function. All raw scores are transformed to normalized scores with a range of possible values from 0 to 100. A positive score indicates improvement.

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline to Week 104

Predose Concentration Of Estradiol At Week 56

Blood samples were collected from participants for estradiol measurements and were analyzed using a standard clinical methodology. The change from Week 52/Baseline in estradiol concentration at Week 56 was presented in this outcome.

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline and Week 56

Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) As A Measure Of Safety And Tolerability

Assessed by percentage of participants with AEs and serious AEs (SAEs). An AE was defined as any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to the medicinal product. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Events of heavy menstrual bleeding were only reported if the event met criteria as an SAE. A summary of serious and all other non-serious adverse events, regardless of causality, is located in the Reported Adverse Events module.

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline up to Week 104

Percent Change From Week 52/Baseline In BMD At Lumbar Spine (L1-L4)

Assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan at the lumbar spine (L1-L4), total hip \[presented separately\], and femoral neck (same leg within each participant) \[presented separately\] at each designated timepoints. The least squares means and their 95% CI were based on analysis of covariance model with treatment, stratification factors, race as fixed factors, and age at Week 52/Baseline, Week 52/Baseline BMD value, and body mass index at Week 52/Baseline as covariates.

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline to Week 104

Percent Change From Week 52/Baseline In BMD At Femoral Neck And Total Hip

Assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan at the lumbar spine (L1-L4) \[presented separately\], total hip, and femoral neck (same leg within each participant) at each designated timepoints. The least squares means and their 95% CI were based on analysis of covariance model with treatment, stratification factors, race as fixed factors, and age at Week 52/Baseline, Week 52/Baseline BMD value, and body mass index at Week 52/Baseline as covariates.

Time frame: Week 52/Baseline to Week 104