The main objective of this study is to assess the safety and tolerability of multiple doses of AMG 598 administered alone or in combination with liraglutide in adults with obesity.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
50
AMG 598 administered by subcutaneous injection
Placebo matching to AMG 598 administered by subcutaneous injection
Liraglutide administered by subcutaneous injection. The starting dose is 0.6 mg/day, and increased by 0.6 mg/day dose increment every 7 days, up to the full dosage of 3.0 mg/day by week 5.
William D Summers MD LLC
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Orange County Research Center
Tustin, California, United States
QPS Miami Research Associates
South Miami, Florida, United States
Dallas Diabetes and Endocrine Center
Dallas, Texas, United States
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
The investigator assessed the severity of each adverse event reported during the study. The assessment was based on the Amgen Standard Grading Scale: Mild: Aware of sign or symptom, but easily tolerated. Moderate: Discomfort enough to cause interference with usual activity. Severe: Incapacitating with inability to work or do usual activity. A Serious adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, met at least 1 of the following serious criteria * Death; * Was life-threatening; * Required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; * Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; * Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; * Other medically important serious event. The investigator also assessed whether each adverse event was related to study drug administration based on clinical judgement.
Time frame: 207 days
Number of Participants With TEAEs Due to Laboratory, Electrocardiogram, and Vital Sign Findings
TEAEs due to laboratory, electrocardiogram (ECG) and vital sign findings include any abnormal laboratory test results (hematology, clinical chemistry, or urinalysis) or electrocardiogram, or vital signs measurements, including those that worsened from baseline, that were considered clinically significant in the medical and scientific judgment of the investigator (ie, not related to progression of underlying disease).
Time frame: 207 days
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of AMG 598 After Subcutaneous Injection on Day 1 and Day 57
Serum concentrations of AMG 598 were determined using a validated electrochemiluminescence-based method. The lower limit of quantitation was 50.0 ng/mL.
Time frame: Day 1, predose, and days 6, 8, 15, 22, and 29; Day 57 predose and days 62, 64, 71, 85, 99, 113, 127, 169, and 207
Time to Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of AMG 598 After Subcutaneous Injection on Day 1 and Day 57
Serum concentrations of AMG 598 were determined using a validated electrochemiluminescence-based method. The lower limit of quantitation was 50.0 ng/mL.
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: Day 1, predose, and days 6, 8, 15, 22, and 29; Day 57 predose and days 62, 64, 71, 85, 99, 113, 127, 169, and 207
Dose-normalized Cmax of AMG 598 After Subcutaneous Injection on Day 1 and Day 57
Serum concentrations of AMG 598 were determined using a validated electrochemiluminescence-based method. The lower limit of quantitation was 50.0 ng/mL.
Time frame: Day 1, predose, and days 6, 8, 15, 22, and 29; Day 57 predose and days 62, 64, 71, 85, 99, 113, 127, 169, and 207
Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 28 Days (AUC0-28) for AMG 598 After Subcutaneous Injection on Day 1 and Day 57
Serum concentrations of AMG 598 were determined using a validated electrochemiluminescence-based method. The lower limit of quantitation was 50.0 ng/mL.
Time frame: Day 1, predose, and days 6, 8, 15, 22, and 29; Day 57 predose and days 62, 64, 71, and 85
Dose-normalized AUC0-28 for AMG 598 After Subcutaneous Injection on Day 1 and Day 57
Serum concentrations of AMG 598 were determined using a validated electrochemiluminescence-based method. The lower limit of quantitation was 50.0 ng/mL.
Time frame: Day 1, predose, and days 6, 8, 15, 22, and 29; Day 57 predose and days 62, 64, 71, and 85
Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of AMG 598 After Subcutaneous Injection on Day 57
Serum concentrations of AMG 598 were determined using a validated electrochemiluminescence-based method. The lower limit of quantitation was 50.0 ng/mL.
Time frame: Day 57 predose and days 62, 64, 71, 85, 99, 113, 127, 169, and 207
Accumulation Ratio (AR) for Cmax of AMG 598 After Subcutaneous Injection on Day 1 and Day 57
Serum concentrations of AMG 598 were determined using a validated electrochemiluminescence-based method. The lower limit of quantitation was 50.0 ng/mL. Accumulation ratio for Cmax = Day 57 Cmax / Day 1 Cmax.
Time frame: Day 1, predose, and days 6, 8, 15, 22, and 29; Day 57 predose and days 62, 64, 71, 85, 99, 113, 127, 169, and 207
Accumulation Ratio of AUC0-28 for AMG 598 After Subcutaneous Injection on Day 1 and Day 57
Serum concentrations of AMG 598 were determined using a validated electrochemiluminescence-based method. The lower limit of quantitation was 50.0 ng/mL. The accumulation ratio for AUC0-28 = Day 57 AUC0-28 / Day 1 AUC0-28.
Time frame: Day 1, predose, and days 6, 8, 15, 22, and 29; Day 57 predose and days 62, 64, 71, and 85
Terminal Half-life (T1/2,z) of AMG 598 After Subcutaneous Injection on Day 57
Serum concentrations of AMG 598 were determined using a validated electrochemiluminescence-based method. The lower limit of quantitation was 50.0 ng/mL.
Time frame: Day 57 predose and days 62, 64, 71, 85, 99, 113, 127, 169, and 207