Overactive Bladder Syndrome: Incobotulinumtoxin Versus Onabotulinumtoxin

Overview

The aim of the original study was to compare Incobot/A versus Onabot/A in order to evaluate if the differences in the pharmacologic formulations between the two drugs could affect their efficacy and safety in the treatment of neurogenic overactive bladder (OAB). In the original study protocol two different dosages for either Incobot/A and Onabot/A (200 U and 100 U) were considered, to treat patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity incontinence performing intermittent catheterization (IC) with higher dosages and those able to void spontaneously with lower dosage, with the resulting four treatment groups. For such a study, a very large sample of participants should have been treated and followed up, to have adequate power to demonstrate the hypothesis. At the end of last February 2020, we had to temporarily stop all the clinical activities related to the study and patients' recruitment, due to the occurrence of Sars-Cov-2 pandemic in our Country. At that point, a non-inferiority study seemed to be possible and adequate, and we adapted the protocol accordingly. In addition, on the basis of previously published information, we could hypothesize that the new drug (Incobot/A) would have had at least a roughly similar effect to the control drug (Onabot/A). In order to perform a non-inferiority study, the power and sample size analysis have been re-planned. Thus, we perform a not planned interim analysis to show the preliminary results of an ongoing, non-inferiority trial in which patients' recruitment temporarily stopped due to incontrollable external factors. The present study will be aimed to assess the non-inferiority of Incobot/A compared to Onabot/A on the efficacy and safety parameters, in the treatment of patients with refractory NDOI performing IC, who are randomized to receive 200 U of Incobot/A or Onabot/A intradetrusor injections and who are followed up to 12 wks after treatment

This is a pilot, prospective, randomized, double blinded, multicentre, clinical trial. After giving a written informed consent, all the patients will be randomized into two groups: Group 1, including patients who will be treated with the Incobot/A and Group 2, including patients who will be treated with Onabot/A. The randomization process will be made by a computerized system. Enrolling period: September 2018- April 2020. Inclusion criteria: * patients (males and females) with neurogenic urge urinary incontinence (UUI) (with urgency, increase in day- time and night- time urinary frequency) and with urodynamic diagnosis of detrusor overactivity (DO); * 18- 80 years; * women of childbearing age, who use a reliable method of contraception throughout the study period (a pregnancy test must be performed during enrolment in the study); * spinal cord injury at or below T1, diagnosed at least 6 months before the screening in case of a vesico-sphincter dysfunction due to spinal cord injury; * EDSS score ≤ 6, in MS patients; * patients refractory to anticholinergic therapy (≥ 1 anticholinergic agent) * application of intermittent catheterizations to empty the bladder. In the case of spontaneous micturition, the patients should agree for the use of intermittent catheterizations, in case this will be necessary after treatment with the detrusor injection of botulinumtoxin A. Urodynamic characteristics: urodynamic diagnosis of DO, refractory to standard anticholinergics and naïve to intradetrusor injection of onabotulinumtoxin A. The wash- out period after anticholinergics should be of at least 3 weeks. It will be also possible for patients continuing to assume previous anticholinergic therapy through the study period. Exclusion criteria: * recurring urinary tract infections (UTIs) (≥ 4 episodes/year); * spinal cord injuries above T1; * MS patients: EDSS score ≥ 6; * patients who won't or can't perform intermittent catheterization; * pregnancy or breast- feeding, if female patients * post- void residual volume (PRV) \> 150 ml, in the case of spontaneous micturition Time 0 (pre-screening): * history and physical examination; * urinalysis and cultures (pregnancy test); * 3- days voiding diary; * urodynamic study; * "Incontinence Quality of Life" (I- QoL) standardized Questionnaire; * Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for evaluation of treatment satisfaction. Time 1. Treatment. Patients will be randomized into two groups, assigned by a computerized system: \- Group 1- Incobot/A: patients with spontaneous micturitions will undergo only one administration of Incobot/A 100 U diluted in 10 ml of sodium chloride solution 0.9% by endoscopic detrusor injections (20 injections, 0.5 ml of solution for each injection); patients who perform intermittent catheterization will undergo only one administration of Incobot/A 200 U diluted in 30 ml of sodium chloride solution 0.9% by endoscopic detrusor injections (30 injections, 1 ml of solution for each injection) \- Group 2- Onabot/A: patients with spontaneous micturitions will undergo only one administration of Onabot/A 100 U diluted in 10 ml of sodium chloride solution 0.9% by endoscopic detrusor injections (20 injections, 0.5 ml of solution for each injection); patients who perform intermittent catheterization will undergo only one administration of Onabot/A 200 U diluted in 30 ml of sodium chloride solution 0.9% by endoscopic detrusor injections (30 injections, 1 ml of solution for each injection) Follow-up: History and physical examination, 3-day voiding diary and VAS were repeated at 2, 4 and 12 weeks, in order to make better comparisons with previously published pivotal trials on Botox. Urinalyses and cultures and I-QoL questionnaire were repeated at 2 and 12 weeks after treatment; urodynamic examination was obtained at 12 weeks follow- up. Outcomes of the study The primary outcome measure is change from baseline in the daily frequency of UI at week 12. Secondary outcomes measures are: the occurrence of UTIs and other treatment-related local and systemic adverse events following the two botulinum toxins A injections, during the observation period; changes from baseline in I-QOL total score and VAS scores (week 2 and week 12); changes from baseline in MCC, first volume and maximum pressure of detrusor overactivity (weeks 12), following the two botulinum toxins A administration. Statistical Analysis: In a non- inferiority trial, it is recommended to set the non-inferiority limit below the minimal clinically important difference such that, after the intervention, the two groups are expected to differ by less than this difference. Group sample sizes of 50 and 50 subjects are required to be 80% sure that the higher limit of 95% confidence interval was below the clinically important non-inferiority limit of + one in UI episodes/day between the experimental and the standard treatment. The true difference between the means is assumed to be 0 with standard deviation (SD) of 2. The significance level (alpha) of the test is 0.05. The sample size is calculated using PASS 11.0.7, Power Analysis and Sample Size Software (2011). NCSS, LLC. Kaysville, Utah, USA. In establishing the non-inferiority margin, we have considered one incontinence episodes/day as non-inferiority limit as the difference of one less urinary incontinence episode represents the smallest difference that can be measured in the count. Moreover, when considering the frequency of daily urinary incontinence (UI) at baseline in both groups of treatment, one UI episode represents about 15%. In the present study, due to the temporary stop of patients' recruitment, a not planned interim analysis of the current data from the ongoing trial is conducted, in order to detect whether the research outcomes will be addressed. The true difference between the means is assumed to be 0 with SD of 2. The significance level (alpha) of the test is 0.05. The sample size is calculated using PASS 11.0.7, Power Analysis and Sample Size Software (2011). NCSS, LLC. Kaysville, Utah, USA. The primary endpoint was analysed using a standard analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model, including treatment group as fixed factors and baseline UI episodes/day as a covariate. If the higher one-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) limit that is produced from the ANCOVA model is lower than + one UI episode, the efficacy of the experimental treatment group is considered not inferior to that of the standard treatment group. Mann-Whitney's U-test is used for comparisons of unpaired data and Friedman and Wilcoxon tests for comparisons of paired data, X2 with Yates' continuity correction or Fisher's exact test are used to analyse categorical data. All statistical analyses are performed using IBM-SPSS® version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA, 2019). In all analyses, a two-sided p-value \<0.05 was considered significant.