Tolerability and Efficacy of Artemether-Lumefantrine Versus Artesunate + Amodiaquine in Zanzibar

Overview

The primary objective of the study was to determine PCR corrected cure-rates up to day 42 in children with uncomplicated malaria, treated with either Artesunate + Amodiaquine or Coartem®. Secondary objectives were to determine safety and possible selection of mutations related to the resistance of the tested drugs.

Combination therapy, the new strategy for malaria treatment, is based on the hypothesis that two (or more) components of different mechanisms of action protect each other from development of resistance. Artemisinin as well as its two derivatives, e.g. artemether and artesunate, constitute a family of compounds with several attractive features for such a combination, due mainly to their rapid onset of effective action against multidrug-resistant P. falciparum and their gametocytocidal effect, which potentially reduces transmission of resistant alleles. There also appears to be no cross-resistance with other known anti-malarials. Because of the short half-life of this family of compounds, their use as mono-therapy requires multiple daily doses over a period of 7 days. Combining them with longer acting partner -drugs allows for a reduction in treatment duration while simultaneously enhancing the efficacy and reducing the likelihood of resistance development. As of October 2001 the following anti-malarial drugs were recommended for malaria treatment in Zanzibar: 1. Artesunate (AS)+ Amodiaquine (AQ) - "first line" (AA) 2. Lumefantrine-artemether (Co-artem®) (CO) - "second line" 3. Quinine, if failure or contra indication of 1 \& 2, or for treatment of severe malaria 4. Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) for Intermittent Presumptive Treatment in pregnancy (IPT) The move that the Zanzibar Ministry of Health has taken with this new treatment policy/strategy provided a unique opportunity to investigate the potential value of combination therapy when introduced on a large scale. Using artemisinine derivatives in combination with anti-malarials with longer half-lives is thought to be highly effective and considerably prevent the development of parasite resistance to the individual drugs. This study therefore provided baseline data on the efficacy of the new treatment policy and also for future monitoring of the policy in Zanzibar. All children presenting with clinical signs of malaria at the study site were considered possible study subjects. The guardians of these children were informed about the study orally in Swahili for providing informed consent. Those who were willing to participate in the study were treated according to local standard procedure. The patient was tested for parasites using light microscopy on Giemsa stained blood films. A detailed clinical history, a clinical examination including an axillary temperature, was assessed. Haemoglobin was assessed and blood samples were collected on filter paper for each child for genotyping of the parasites as well as for determining blood levels of different antimalarial drugs. The children included in the study were assigned to one of the two treatment options according to randomisation schedule, except children \<9 months weighing \<9 kg who were assigned AA because AL was registered for treatment of children \<9 months weighing \<9 kg. The drugs were given in standard doses according to bodyweight: artesunate 4 mg/kg bodyweight + amodiaquine 10 mg/kg bodyweight, once daily for 3 days, Coartem: 9 to \<15 kg: 1 tablet; 15-25 kg: 2 tablets, twice daily for 3 days. All drugs were administrated under direct supervision of a study nurse. Full drug doses were re-administered if a patient spits out or vomits within 30 minutes. Drug treatment was provided free of charge. The guardian was asked to bring their child back to the study site on day 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35 and 42. If they failed to do so they were visited in their homes to assure proper follow-up. At each follow-up the investigator asked about concomitant medication and adverse events, carefully filling out the clinical report form (CRF). If, during the follow-up between day 14 and 42, a child presented with fever, all tests and examinations were run as on day 0. If the child was clinically and parasitologically diagnosed with malaria again, he was treated as a new infection as of the national recommended guidelines. If diagnosed with severe malaria during the follow-up period the patient was given rescue treatment (oral or intravenous Quinine) and taken out of the study. Each time an enrolled child presented at the site the CRF was completed with regards to clinical and laboratory status, treatment given and possible adverse events. The study drugs were obtained from the respective companies with the assistance of WHO/TDR and RBM.

Conditions

Interventions

Eligibility

Outcomes