Laparoscopy has revolutionized the approach to a number of surgical problems causing a re-evaluation of several clinical strategies. Now it has become the standard treatment for majority of ailments including symptomatic gall stone disease, appendicitis, GERD (gastroesophageal reflux disease), morbid obesity and colorectal disease. All these developments aim at minimizing perioperative morbidities, providing rapid postoperative recovery and enhancing patient's safety profile. One of the major limitations of conventional laparoscopy is lack of depth perception. Introduction of 3D imaging, has removed many of these technical obstacles. In 1993, Becker et al., reported that a 3D display might improve laparoscopic skills. Since then, many researchers have demonstrated benefit of 3D imaging . Starting from this, we can theorize an impact of 3D technologies on surgeon's learning curves. This concern is recently being demonstrated in experimental and clinical setting with improvement of hand-eye coordination, better laparoscopic skills and less time to learn surgical procedure. Usually junior surgeons (JS) start their activities with cholecystectomy and appendectomy but, despite an amount of literature regarding the first procedure, there is a 'black hole' regarding the use of 3D imaging in laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). The investigators decided to investigate the impact of 3D visualization on surgeons' and surgical outcome during laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) performed by junior surgeons (JS). Operative details and clinical aspect are both take in account in order to looking for any advantages or concerns conferred on JS in performing LA.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
128
surgical removal of inflamed cecal appendix by 3D laparoscopic procedure
surgical removal of inflamed cecal appendix by 2D laparoscopic procedure
Presidio Ospedaliero di Montichiari, ASST degli Spedali Civili di Brescia
Montichiari, Brescia, Italy
Operative time.
Time taken for the completion of the procedure
Time frame: 1 minute after surgery
Conversion to open appendectomy.
Compare the rate of conversion between each arm.
Time frame: 1 minute after surgery
Intraoperative complication
Accidental bowel or bladder perforation, uncontrolled bleeding.
Time frame: 1 minute after surgery
Post-operative complication. morbidity, readmission at 30th days, mortality
Post-operative complication. morbidity, readmission at 30th days, mortality
Time frame: 30 days
Surgeon's comfort
based on questionnaire following the operation: LIKERT scale: from 1 to 5 points for 8 items divided in 2 evaluation: surgical outcome and surgical strain. Surgical outcome: item 1: surgical skill perception item 2: definition of surgical field item 3: deep perception Surgical strain: item1: hand and wrist strain item 2: neck strain item 3: back strain item 4: eye strain item 5: performance anxiety
Time frame: 1 hour after surgery
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.