The aim of this study was to investigate the short-term clinical performance and subjective acceptance of the two study lenses.
This study was a randomised, double-masked, crossover, bilateral dispensing study, controlled by cross-comparison. Fifty-five subjects will wear each lens brand for approximately one week in random order. Lenses were worn on a daily wear, daily disposable basis.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
55
midafilcon A 1 day daily disposable contact lens
somofilcon A 1 day daily disposable contact lens
CooperVision Inc.
Pleasanton, California, United States
Lens Fit - Horizontal Centration
Assessment of horizontal centration of lens (extremely nasal, slightly nasal, optimum, slightly temporal, extremely temporal)
Time frame: Baseline
Lens Fit - Horizontal Centration
Assessment of horizontal centration of lens (extremely nasal, slightly nasal, optimum, slightly temporal, extremely temporal)
Time frame: One Week
Lens Fit - Vertical Centration
Assessment of vertical centration of lens (extremely inferior, slightly inferior, optimum, slightly superior, extremely superior)
Time frame: Baseline
Lens Fit - Vertical Centration
Assessment of vertical centration of lens (extremely inferior, slightly inferior, optimum, slightly superior, extremely superior)
Time frame: One Week
Lens Fit - Corneal Coverage
Assessment of corneal coverage of lens (extremely inadequate, slightly inadequate, optimum, slightly excessive, extremely excessive)
Time frame: Baseline
Lens Fit - Corneal Coverage
Assessment of corneal coverage of lens (extremely inadequate, slightly inadequate, optimum, slightly excessive, extremely excessive)
Time frame: One Week
Lens Fit - Lens Movement
Lens movement assessed per corneal coverage (extremely inadequate, slightly inadequate, optimum, slightly excessive, extremely excessive)
Time frame: Baseline
Lens Fit - Lens Movement
Lens movement assessed per corneal coverage (extremely inadequate, slightly inadequate, optimum, slightly excessive, extremely excessive)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Time frame: One Week
Subjective Score for Vision
Subjects will score on visual analogue scale for vision (0 -100) (0 - Unacceptable, 20 - Very poor, 40 - Poor, 60 - Good, 80 - Very Good, 100 - Excellent)
Time frame: Baseline
Subjective Score for Vision
Subjects will score on visual analogue scale for Vision (0 -100) (0 - Unacceptable, 20 - Very poor, 40 - Poor, 60 - Good, 80 - Very Good, 100 - Excellent)
Time frame: One week