This study aimed to assess and compare the clinical and radiographic success rates of LLLT and FC for pulpotomy in human primary teeth. One hundred and six primary molars from 36 children aging five to eight years were included and randomly assigned into two equal groups; LLLT group and FC group. Teeth were evaluated clinically and radiographically at 3, 6 and 12 months.
Background: Various agents are available to dress the remaining pulp tissue after pulpotomy procedure with the formocresol (FC) being the gold standard for the last 60 years. Nowadays, low-level laser therapy (LLLT) becomes a technique of interest, due to its many characteristics. However, the literature available on its success in pulpotomy is limited and reported conflicting results. Aim of the study: To assess and compare the clinical and radiographic success rates of LLLT and FC for pulpotomy in human primary teeth. Materials and methods: Utilizing split-mouth technique, the sample consisted of 106 primary molars from 36 children aging five to eight years. The teeth were selected based on specific clinical and radiographic inclusion criteria and randomly assigned into two equal groups; LLLT group and FC group. All the 106 primary molars were indicated for pulpotomy, where 53 teeth were treated using FC and 53 teeth were treated with LLLT. Teeth were evaluated clinically and radiographically at 3, 6 and 12 months.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
36
It is a diode laser device that has laser set at low level, used for pain relief and inflammation reduction to induce healing
King Abdulaziz University, Dental University Hospital
Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Clinical success rate
The pulpotomy procedure was considered clinically successful if there were no pain, swelling, tenderness to percussion, abscess or abnormal mobility
Time frame: 3 months
Clinical success rate
The pulpotomy procedure was considered clinically successful if there were no pain, swelling, tenderness to percussion, abscess or abnormal mobility
Time frame: 6 months
Clinical success rate
The pulpotomy procedure was considered clinically successful if there were no pain, swelling, tenderness to percussion, abscess or abnormal mobility
Time frame: 12 months
Radiographic success rate
The pulpotomy procedure was considered clinically successful if it demonstrated the following criteria: 1. Normal periodontal ligament space 2. No inter-radicular or periapical radiolucency 3. No internal or external root resorption
Time frame: 3 months
Radiographic success rate
The pulpotomy procedure was considered clinically successful if it demonstrated the following criteria: 1. Normal periodontal ligament space 2. No inter-radicular or periapical radiolucency 3. No internal or external root resorption
Time frame: 6 months
Radiographic success rate
The pulpotomy procedure was considered clinically successful if it demonstrated the following criteria: 1. Normal periodontal ligament space 2. No inter-radicular or periapical radiolucency 3. No internal or external root resorption
Time frame: 12 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.