MULTISARC is a randomized multicenter study assessing whether high throughput molecular analysis (next generation sequencing exome - NGS) is feasible in advanced/metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma patients, that is, whether NGS can be conducted for a large proportion of patients, with results available within reasonnable delays. In parallel, MULTISARC aims to assess efficacy of an innovative treatment strategy guided by high throughput molecular analysis (next generation sequencing exome, RNASeq \[NGS\]) in patients with Advanced/metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas. At the end of first-line treatment, participant's tumor profile of experimental Arm NGS (treatment strategy based on NGS results) will be discussed within a multidisciplinary tumor board which aims at discussing the genomic profiles and at providing a therapeutic decision for each participant. Participants for whom a targetable genomic alteration has been identified will be proposed to enter in one of the subsequent phase II single-arm sub-trial.
Screening phase: frozen tumor sample (archived or newly obtained) and blood sample will be used for genetic profiling. Patients can be considered as pre-eligible for the randomized phase when all genetic material have been received by the Platform. Randomization phase: the randomization will allocate the following arms with a ratio 1:1: * experimental Arm NGS : treatment strategy based on NGS results \[exome, RNASeq\] * standard Arm No NGS: treatment strategy not based on NGS (Note that for these participants and under specific conditions, subsequent NGS analyses may be allowed within the scope of the trial) Single-arm phase II sub-trial: at the end of the first-line treatment and regardless of tumor response as per RECIST v1.1, patients randomized in Arm NGS and for whom a targetable alteration has been identified by the Molecular Tumor Board will be considered as pre-eligible for the targeted sub-study. The mandatory post-chemotherapy wash-out period of 21 days will provide time to achieve all the required tests and examinations.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
603
Target: KIT, PDGFRA, CSF1R Nilotinib will be administered orally, 400 mg twice daily on a continuous basis. A treatment cycle consists of 4 weeks. Treatment may continue until disease progression or study discontinuation.
Target: ALK, ROS. Ceritinib will be administered orally, 450mg once daily on a continuous basis. A treatment cycle consists of 4 weeks. Treatment may continue until disease progression or study discontinuation.
Target: MET. Capmatinib will be administered orally, 400mg twice daily on a continuous basis. A treatment cycle consists of 4 weeks. Treatment may continue until disease progression or study discontinuation.
Target: ERBB2, EGFR. Lapatinib will be administered orally, 1500mg once daily on a continuous basis. A treatment cycle consists of 4 weeks. Treatment may continue until disease progression or study discontinuation.
Target: KRAS, NRAS, HRAS, PTPN11, NF1, MAP2K. Trametinib will be administered orally, 2 mg once daily on a continuous basis. A treatment cycle consists of 4 weeks. Treatment may continue until disease progression or study discontinuation.
Target: KRAS, NRAS, HRAS, PTPN11, NF1, MAP2K, BRAF. Trametinib will be administered orally, 2mg once daily on a continuous basis. Dabrafenib will be administered orally, 150mg twice daily, on a continuous basis. A treatment cycle consists of 4 weeks. Treatment may continue until disease progression or study discontinuation.
Target: PDL1, PARP. Olaparib will be administered orally, 300mg twice daily on a continuous basis. Dabrafenib will be administered intraveinously, 1500mg on day 1 every 4 weeks. A treatment cycle consists of 4 weeks. Treatment may continue until disease progression or study discontinuation.
Target: CDK4, CDK6. Palbociclib will be administered orally, 125mg once daily, 3 weeks on/1 week off. A treatment cycle consists of 4 weeks. Treatment may continue until disease progression or study discontinuation.
Target: SMO. Glasdegib will be administered orally, 300 mg once daily on a continuous basis. A treatment cycle consists of 4 weeks. Treatment may continue until disease progression or study discontinuation.
Target: FGFR. TAS-120 will be administered orally, 20 mg once daily on a continuous basis. A treatment cycle consists of 3 weeks. Treatment may continue until disease progression or study discontinuation.
Both frozentumor material (archived or newly obtained) and blood sample collection will be used for genetic profiling
Institut Bergonie
Bordeaux, France
Centre Georges François Leclerc
Dijon, France
Centre Oscar Lambret
Lille, France
Centre Léon Bérard
Lyon, France
Institut Paoli Calmettes
Marseille, France
Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier
Montpellier, France
Centre Antoine Lacassagne
Nice, France
Hôpital Cochin
Paris, France
Hôpital Pitié Salpétrière
Paris, France
Institut Curie
Paris, France
...and 7 more locations
To assess the feasibility of high throughput molecular analysis (next generation sequencing exome [NGS]
Feasibility will be defined as the proportion of participants for whom results from NGS are (i) interpretable and (ii) for whom a validated report of exome sequencing including a clinical recommendation from the molecular tumor board is available within 7 weeks (i.e. within at most 49 calendar days) after reception of blood and tumor samples by one of the molecular platform.
Time frame: 7 weeks
Comparison of the efficacy of the 2 treatment strategies (NGS vs No NGS) in terms of 1-year progression-free survival (PFS)
PFS will be defined as the delay from the date of randomization to the date of progression as per RECIST v1.1 (or death, whichever occurs first)
Time frame: 1 year
Comparison of the efficacy of the 2 treatment strategies (NGS vs No NGS) in terms of 2-year progression-free survival (PFS)
PFS will be defined as the delay from the date of randomization to the date of progression as per RECIST v1.1 (or death, whichever occurs first)
Time frame: 2 years
Comparison of the efficacy of the 2 treatment strategies (NGS vs No NGS) in terms of 1-year overall survival (OS)
OS will be defined as the delay from the date of randomization to the date of death (whatever the cause)
Time frame: 1 year
Comparison of the efficacy of the 2 treatment strategies (NGS vs No NGS) in terms of 2-year overall survival (OS)
OS will be defined as the delay from the date of randomization to the date of death (whatever the cause)
Time frame: 2 years
Assessment of the feasibility of high throughput molecular analysis in terms of delay to obtain a clinical recommendation from the molecular tumor board for patients randomized in arm NGS with interpretable NGS
Delay from the date of signature of the informed consent to the date of the molecular tumor board
Time frame: an average of 7 weeks
Assessment of the proportion of patients with Advanced STS presenting at least one targetable genomic alteration
A participant will be considered as "presenting at least one targetable genomic alteration", if the MTB considers that at least one genetic alteration identified can be matched with one of the drugs available through the MULTISARC study
Time frame: An average of 7 weeks
Assessment of the efficacy of first-line systemic treatment in terms of 1-year progression-free survival
PFS will be defined as the delay from the date of onset of first-line treatment to the date of progression as per RECIST v1.1 (or death, whichever occurs first)
Time frame: 1 year
Assessment of the efficacy of first-line systemic treatment in terms of 2-year progression-free survival
PFS will be defined as the delay from the date of onset of first-line treatment to the date of progression as per RECIST v1.1 (or death, whichever occurs first)
Time frame: 2 years
Assessment of the efficacy of first-line systemic treatment in terms of 1-year overall survival
OS will be defined as the delay from the date of onset of first-line treatment to the date of death (whatever the cause).
Time frame: 1 year
Assessment of the efficacy of first-line systemic treatment in terms of 2-year overall survival
OS will be defined as the delay from the date of onset of first-line treatment to the date of death (whatever the cause).
Time frame: 2 years
Assessment of the efficacy of first-line systemic treatment in terms of best overall response under first-line treatment
Best response is recorded from the date of onset of first-line treatment until the end of first-line treatment taking into account any requirement for confirmation as per RECIST v1.1 criteria
Time frame: Throughout the treatment period, an average of 18 weeks
Assessment of the efficacy of first-line systemic treatment in terms of 6-month objective response
Objective response is defined as complete or partial response (CR, PR) as per RECIST v1.1 under first-line treatment
Time frame: 6 months
Assessment of the efficacy of first-line systemic treatment in terms of 6-month non progression
Non progression is defined as complete or partial response (CR, PR) or stable disease (SD) under first-line treatment as defined as per RECIST v1.1
Time frame: 6 months
Assessment of the efficacy of each targeted treatment in terms of 6-month non progression
Non progression is defined as complete or partial response (CR, PR) or stable disease (SD) under targeted treatment as defined as per RECIST v1.1
Time frame: 6 months
Assessment of the efficacy of each targeted treatment in terms of 1-year progression-free survival
PFS will be defined as the delay from the date of targeted treatment initiation to the date of progression as per RECIST v1.1 or death, whichever occurs first
Time frame: 1 year
Assessment of the efficacy of each targeted treatment in terms of 1-year overall survival
OS is defined as the delay from the date of targeted treatment initiation to the date of death (whatever the cause)
Time frame: 1 year
Assessment of the efficacy of each targeted treatment in terms of best overall response under treatment
Best response (partial or complete, as per RECIST v1.1) recorded from date of targeted treatment initiation taking into account any requirement for confirmation as per RECIST v1.1 criteria
Time frame: Throughout the treatment period, an average of 6 months
Assessment of the efficacy of each targeted treatment in terms of objective response under treatment
Complete response or partial response under targeted treatment as defined as per RECIST evaluation criteria v1.1
Time frame: Throughout the treatment period, an average of 6 months
Assessment of the efficacy of each targeted treatment in terms of change in tumor size (CTS)
CTS is defined as the difference (in percentage) in tumor size burden from the date of targeted treatment initiation (baseline) to the tumor assessment
Time frame: Throughout the treatment period, an average of 6 months
Assessment of the safety profile of each targeted treatment using the CTCAE v5
Safety will be assessed as per CTCAE v5
Time frame: Throughout the treatment period, an average of 6 months
Impact of the results of immunosequencing during first-line treatment
Correlation of TCR-sequencing data with objective response (OR), OR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Evaluation of the association between immune profiles derived from ancillary analyses (VISIUM HD, multiplex IF, SomaScan proteomics) and treatment response, within an integrated immunosequencing framework.
Time frame: At cycle 2 day 1 of targeted treatment
To estimate the cost-effectiveness of the strategy usdin NGS as compared to the strategy without NGS
The outcome will be the incremental cost-utility ratio or the incremental cost per incremental Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY)
Time frame: Trhoughout the study period, an average of 2 years
To assess the feasibility of NGS in participants who have switched treatment arm for NGS arm in terms of proportion of participants with interpretable NGS results
Proportion of participants with interpretable NGS results
Time frame: an average of 7 weeks
To assess the feasibility of NGS in participants who have switched treatment arm for NGS arm in terms of delays
Delay from the date of treatment failure (progression, investigator decision, end of last treatment line) to the date of the molecular tumor board
Time frame: an average of 7 weeks
To assess the feasibility of NGS in participants who have switched treatment arm for NGS arm in terms of proportion of participants with interpretable NGS results
Proportion of participants presenting at least one targetable genomic alteration
Time frame: an average of 7 weeks
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.