Background: Studies have questioned the necessity of restoring cavitated carious lesion on primary teeth, once the control of biofilm is the most important factor to arrest these lesions. This randomized clinical trial aimed to compare the survival of teeth treated with a non-restorative cavity control (NRCC) compared to resin composite restorations (RCR) on proximal carious lesion in anterior primary teeth, as well as the impact of these treatments on patient-centered outcomes. Methods: A randomized clinical trial with two parallels arms (1:1) will be conducted. Children between 3 and 6 years old will be selected from the Center of Clinic Research of Pediatric Dentistry of Ibirapuera University (UNIB), a dental trailer (FOUSP) located on Educational Complex Professor Carlos Osmarinho de Lima, the Pediatric Dentistry Clinic of Santa Cecília University and from the Pediatric Dentistry Clinic of University Center UNINOVAFAPI. One hundred and forty-eight teeth will be randomly distributed in two experimental groups: (1) Selective removal of carious tissue and RCR; or (2) NRCC through cavity enlargement using metallic sandpaper. The primary outcome will be tooth survival after 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The duration and the cost of dental treatments will be considered for the estimation of the cost-effectiveness of the evaluated treatments. The discomfort reported by the participants will be measured after each treatment using the FIS scale. The participants' satisfaction and perception of the parents/legal guardians will be evaluated through questionnaires. For the primary outcome, Kaplan-Meier's survival and Long-Rank test will be used for comparison between the two groups. All the variables will be modeled by Cox regression with shared fragility. Significance will be considered at 5%.
This non-inferiority randomized controlled clinical trial, with two parallel groups with 1:1 allocation ratio, was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Universidade Ibirapuera (UNIB). The other centers involved are considered co-participants (Centro Universitário do Norte - Uninorte , Centro Universitário Uninovafapi - UNINOVAFAPI, and School of Dentistry from the University of Sao Paulo - FOUSP). Children aged 3 to 6 years with at least one proximal cavitated lesion on anterior primary teeth will be selected from the Clinical Pediatric Research Center. Teeth will be randomly allocated to selective removal of carious tissue and resin composite restoration (RCR) or NRCC. Tooth survival after two years of follow-up will be the primary outcome and cost-effectiveness, satisfaction, and discomfort reported by participants and parents/guardians' perception will be the secondary outcomes. Only patients who fulfill the eligibility criteria will be included in the study after the legal guardians sign the informed consent form and the child consents to participate in the study.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
148
The proximal cavities will be enlarged with metallic sandpaper, exposing the cavity, to allow access for toothbrushing associated with 1000 ppm fluoride toothpaste.
In control group, the treatment will be performed after prophylaxis and relative isolation. The selective carious tissue removal will be performed with appropriate dentin curettes. The acid conditioning will be performed only in enamel for 15 s with 37% phosphoric acid gel, and then the application of the adhesive system and restoration of resin composite will be conducted.
Tamara Kerber Tedesco
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Tooth survival by clinical assessment
Comparing the survival of teeth treated with restoration of resin composite and with NRCC for lesions cavitated in anterior primary teeth by clinical assessment, considering as success when the teeth will be without clinical signs or symptoms of pulp pathology or exfoliated, with no need for more invasive interventions, such as pulpectomy or extraction.
Time frame: 24 months
Discomfort regarding the treatment options by a Face image scale (FIS)
Children-reported discomfort regarding the treatment options by a Face image scale (FIS). The scale present 5 different faces since "very happy" (scored as 1) until "very sad" (scored as 5) with the treatment. Higher scores mean a worse discomfort.
Time frame: Immediately after treatment
Cost-effectiveness analysis
The duration of the treatments (time of treatment) and the cost of the materials used will be considered for the estimation of the cost-efficacy of the treatments by a ratio - cost/effectiveness, being effectiveness considered the tooth survival.
Time frame: 24 months.
Perception of parents / guardians evaluated through questionnaire
Parents perception of the treatments will be evaluated through a questionnaire - "Child's and parent's questionnaire about teeth appearance" - with possible answers varying from very satisfied until insatisfied. After the questionnaire is applied for the parents/guardians, the anwsers will bem transformed in scores 1 to 5, in according the original paper that validated the questionnaire. Higher scores mean a worse perception.
Time frame: Prior to treatment, immediately after and 6 months later.
Satisfaction of children: questionnaire
Children-reported satisfaction regarding the treatment by a questionnaire with five question which for answers will be used a Face image scale (FIS). The scale present 5 different faces since "very happy" (scored as 1) until "very sad" (scored as 5) with the treatment. Lower scores mean a better satisfaction.
Time frame: After 6 months
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.