The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of 3 different dose levels of ASP3772 in comparison to the active comparator Prevnar 13® (PCV13) in adults 18 to 64 years of age in Stage 1. Stage 2 will evaluate the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of 3 different dose levels of ASP3772 in comparison to the active comparator PCV13 in elderly 65 to 85 years of age. In addition, Stage 2 will evaluate the immunogenicity of 3 different dose levels of ASP3772 relative to the response seen following administration of Pneumovax® 23 (PPSV23) for the serotypes not included in PCV13.
The study population will consist of 3 different groups: Group 1 - Stage 1 PCV13 naïve participants randomized within 3 sequential cohorts to ASP3772 or PCV13; Group 2 - Stage 2 PCV13 naïve participants randomized within 3 sequential cohorts to ASP3772 or PCV13; and Group 3 - Stage 2 participants previously vaccinated with PCV13 that will receive PPSV23.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
630
Advanced Clinical Research-Rancho Paseo
Banning, California, United States
Artemis Institute
San Diego, California, United States
Artemis Institute
San Marcos, California, United States
Research Centers of America
Hollywood, Florida, United States
Meridian Clinical Research
Savannah, Georgia, United States
Sundance Clinical Research
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Meridian Clinical Research
Norfolk, Nebraska, United States
United Medical Associates
Binghamton, New York, United States
PMG Research of Raleigh
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
PMG Research of Hickory, LLC
Rocky Mount, North Carolina, United States
...and 16 more locations
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), [Stage 1, Group 1]
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study vaccine, and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this vaccination. A TEAE is defined as any AE with onset within 30 days from study vaccine administration. Medically attended TEAEs (MAAEs) are AEs for which the participant has received medical attention by medical personnel, or in an emergency room, or which led to hospitalization. A new-onset chronic disease TEAEs (NOCD) is defined as a MAAE which a) was absent at baseline; b) has not resolved at the follow-up telephone call; c) requires continuous medical care or attention. Potentially Immune Mediated medical condition TEAEs (PIMMCs) are defined as any AEs of autoimmune or auto inflammatory nature.
Time frame: From Day 1, Up to Day 180
Number of Participants With TEAEs, [Stage 2, Group 2]
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study vaccine, and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this vaccination. A TEAE is defined as any AE with onset within 30 days from study vaccine administration. Medically attended TEAEs (MAAEs) are AEs for which the participant has received medical attention by medical personnel, or in an emergency room, or which led to hospitalization. A new-onset chronic disease TEAEs (NOCD) is defined as a MAAE which a) was absent at baseline; b) has not resolved at the follow-up telephone call; c) requires continuous medical care or attention. Potentially Immune Mediated medical condition TEAEs (PIMMCs) are defined as any AEs of autoimmune or auto inflammatory nature. As specified in protocol, data was planned to be analyzed for PCV13 pooled comparator from each group given PCV13 to compare with each ASP3772 dose.
Time frame: From Day 1, Up to Day 180
Number of Participants With TEAEs, [Stage 2, Group 3]
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study vaccine, and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this vaccination. A TEAE is defined as any AE with onset within 30 days from study vaccine administration. Medically attended TEAEs (MAAEs) are AEs for which the participant has received medical attention by medical personnel, or in an emergency room, or which led to hospitalization. A new-onset chronic disease TEAEs (NOCD) is defined as a MAAE which a) was absent at baseline; b) has not resolved at the follow-up telephone call; c) requires continuous medical care or attention. Potentially Immune Mediated medical condition TEAEs (PIMMCs) are defined as any AEs of autoimmune or auto inflammatory nature.
Time frame: From Day 1, Up to Day 30
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs
Vital signs parameters included blood pressure (hypotension and hypertension), pulse rate (tachycardia and bradycardia), body temperature and respiratory rate. Any change in vital sign abnormalities that was clinically significant in the medical and scientific judgment of the investigator and not related to an underlying disease was reported as an unsolicited adverse event (AE). Any clinically significant abnormality associated with underlying disease does not require reporting as an (S)AE unless judged by the investigator to be more severe than expected for the participant's condition.
Time frame: During first hour post vaccination (vaccine administered at Day 1)
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Values
Clinical laboratory testing included hematology, clinical chemistry, or urinalysis. Any abnormal laboratory test result (e.g., in hematology, clinical chemistry, or urinalysis) that was clinically significant in the medical and scientific judgment of the investigator and not related to an underlying disease was reported as an unsolicited adverse event (AE). Laboratory tests of clinical interest included total bilirubin ≥ 2x ULN and Alkaline phosphatase \> 1.5 × upper limit of normal. Study Investigator's interest was to assess only potentially clinically significant values.
Time frame: Up to Day 30
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Physical Examination Values
A physical examination consists of an examination of general appearance, eyes, nose throat, neck (including thyroid), lymph nodes, chest, lungs, cardiovascular, abdomen, skin, extremities, musculoskeletal and neurological system including mental status. Any abnormal test result that was clinically significant in the medical and scientific judgment of the investigator and not related to an underlying disease was reported as an unsolicited adverse event (AE). Study Investigator's interest was to assess only potentially clinically significant values.
Time frame: Up to Day 30
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG), [Stage 1, Group 1] and [Stage 2, Group 2]
The Investigator assessed standard 12-lead ECG recordings for the purposes of safety assessment and participant management. Any clinically significant abnormality, as determined by the investigator's medical and scientific judgment and unrelated to underlying disease, should be reported as an unsolicited (S)AE. Any clinically significant abnormality associated with underlying disease does not require reporting as an (S)AE unless judged by the investigator to be more severe than expected for the participant's condition.
Time frame: Day - 28 to Day -1 (28 days prior to study vaccination)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG), [Stage 1, Group 1] and [Stage 2, Group 2]
The Investigator assessed standard 12-lead ECG recordings for the purposes of safety assessment and participant management. Any clinically significant abnormality, as determined by the investigator's medical and scientific judgment and unrelated to underlying disease, should be reported as an unsolicited (S)AE. Any clinically significant abnormality associated with underlying disease does not require reporting as an (S)AE unless judged by the investigator to be more severe than expected for the participant's condition.
Time frame: At Day 7
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG), [Stage 2, Group 3]
The Investigator assessed standard 12-lead ECG recordings for the purposes of safety assessment and participant management. Any clinically significant abnormality, as determined by the investigator's medical and scientific judgment and unrelated to underlying disease, should be reported as an unsolicited (S)AE. Any clinically significant abnormality associated with underlying disease does not require reporting as an (S)AE unless judged by the investigator to be more severe than expected for the participant's condition.
Time frame: Day - 28 to Day -1 (28 days prior to study vaccination)
Reactogenicity Assessed by Number of Participants With Solicited Local Reactions, [Stage 1, Group 1]
Local reactions include pain, tenderness, redness/erythema, swelling and induration.
Time frame: Up to 7 Day post Vaccination (vaccine administered at Day 1)
Reactogenicity Assessed by Number of Solicited Local Reactions, [Stage 2, Group 2 and Group 3]
Assessed solicited local reactions were pain, tenderness, redness/erythema, swelling, induration, itching at injection site and pruritus at injection site.
Time frame: Up to 7 Day post Vaccination (vaccine administered at Day 1)
Reactogenicity Assessed by Number of Solicited Systemic Reactions, [Stage 1, Group 1]
Assessed systemic reactions were nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, headache, fever, fatigue and muscle discomfort or pain/myalgia.
Time frame: Up to 7 Day post Vaccination (vaccine administered at Day 1)
Reactogenicity Assessed by Number of Solicited Systemic Reactions [Stage 2, Group 2 and Group 3]
Assessed systemic reactions were nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, headache, fever, fatigue and muscle discomfort or pain/myalgia.
Time frame: Up to 7 Day post Vaccination (vaccine administered at Day 1)
Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) for Serotype-specific Opsonophagocytic Activity (OPA) Titer, [Stage 1, Group 1]
OPA titers were determined for serotypes: 1, 3,4, 5, 6A, 6B, 7F, 9V, 14, 18C, 19A, 19F, 23F. OPA titer was expressed as the reciprocal of the serum dilution that causes a 50% reduction in the colony-forming units.
Time frame: At Day 1 and Day 30
Geometric Mean Concentration (GMCs) for Serotype-specific Immunoglobulin G (IgG), [Stage 1, Group 1]
Immunological responses were assessed in terms of IgG GMCs and expressed as titers. The assessed serotypes were: 1, 3,4, 5, 6A, 6B, 7F, 9V, 14, 18C, 19A, 19F, 23F.
Time frame: At Day 1 and Day 30
Geometric Mean Fold Rise (GMFR) for Unique Serotypes IgG [Stage 1, Group 1]
Immunological responses were assessed in terms of IgG GMFRs. The assessed serotypes were: 2, 8, 9N, 10A, 11A, 12F, 15B, 17F, 20B, 22F, and 33F.
Time frame: At Day 30
Percentage of Participants With Unique Serotypes IgG of Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 4-fold Increase, [Stage 1, Group 1]
Immunological responses were assessed in terms of percentage of participants with serotype-specific IgG concentration \>=4-fold increase. The assessed serotypes were: 2, 8, 9N, 10A, 11A, 12F, 15B, 17F, 20B, 22F, 33F.
Time frame: At Day 30
GMTs for Unique Serotype OPA Titer, [Stage 1, Group 1]
Immunological responses were assessed in terms of OPA GMTs. The assessed serotypes were: 2, 8, 9N, 10A, 11A, 12F, 15B, 17F, 20B, 22F, 33F.
Time frame: At Day 30
GMTs for Serotype-specific OPA Titer, [Stage 2, Group 2]
Immunological responses were assessed in terms of OPA GMTs and expressed as titers. The assessed serotypes were: 1, 3,4, 5, 6A, 6B, 7F, 9V, 14, 18C, 19A, 19F, 23F.
Time frame: At Day 1 and Day 30
GMCs for Serotype-specific IgG, [Stage 2, Group 2]
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Immunological responses were assessed in terms of IgG GMCs and expressed as titers. The assessed serotypes were: 1, 3,4, 5, 6A, 6B, 7F, 9V, 14, 18C, 19A, 19F, 23F.
Time frame: At Day 1 and Day 30
GMFR for Unique Serotypes IgG, [Stage 2, Group 2]
Immunological responses were assessed in terms of IgG GMFRs. The assessed serotypes were: 2, 8, 9N, 10A, 11A, 12F, 15B, 17F, 20B, 22F, and 33F.
Time frame: At Day 30
Percentage of Participants With Unique Serotype-specific IgG Concentration of Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 4-fold Increase, [Stage 2, Group 2]
Immunological responses were assessed in terms of percentage of participants with unique serotypes IgG concentration \>=4-fold increase. The assessed serotypes were: 2, 8, 9N, 10A, 11A, 12F, 15B, 17F, 20B, 22F, 33F.
Time frame: At Day 30
Dose Response in OPA Titer for ASP3772 (Stage 2, Group 2)
An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model was conducted with age categories (65 to 74 years and 75 to 85 years) serving as covariates, and treatment groups (ASP3772 1 µg, 2 µg, and 5 µg) as the factor of interest. The natural logarithm (log) of pneumococcal OPA titers for each serotype were examined to assess the dose-response relationship. The assessed serotypes were: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6A, 6B, 7F, 8, 9N, 9V, 10A, 11A, 12F, 14, 15B, 17F, 18C, 19A, 19F,20B, 22F, 23F, and 33F. he assessed serotypes were: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6A, 6B, 7F, 8, 9N, 9V, 10A, 11A, 12F, 14, 15B, 17F, 18C, 19A, 19F,20B, 22F, 23F, and 33F.
Time frame: At Day 30
Dose Response in the IgG Concentrations for ASP3772 [Stage 2, Group 2]
An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model was conducted with age categories (65 to 74 years and 75 to 85 years) serving as covariates, and treatment groups (ASP3772 1 µg, 2 µg, and 5 µg) as the factor of interest. The natural logarithm (log) of IgG concentrations for each serotype were examined to assess the dose-response relationship.
Time frame: At Day 30
GMTs for Unique Serotype OPA Titer [Stage 2, Group 2 and Group 3]
Immunological responses were assessed in terms of OPA GMTs. The assessed serotypes were: 2, 8, 9N, 10A, 11A, 12F, 15B, 17F, 20B, 22F, 33F.
Time frame: At Day 30
GMCs for Unique Serotypes IgG, [Stage 2, Group 2 and Group 3]
Immunogenicity was measured in terms of IgG GMCs and expressed as titers. The assessed serotypes were: 2, 8, 9N, 10A, 11A, 12F, 15B, 17F, 20B, 22F, 33F.
Time frame: At Day 30