Multi-centre, randomised clinical trial with anticipated 17 European centres: in the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany and UK. Patients with a dysfunctional bypass graft with a clinical indication for revascularization will be randomized to either PCI of the native vessel or PCI of the dysfunctional venous bypass graft. 584 patients with a a clinical indication for percutaneous coronary intervention and a dysfunctional graft on the target vesselional venous bypass graft are planned to be enrolled during 3 years.Study objectives: to investigate the clinical and angiographic outcome of native vessel PCI compared to PCI of venous bypass graft in patients with a dysfunctional venous bypass graft with a clinical indication for revascularization. 1 year and 5 years, follow-up will be performed by means of a telephonic visit. After 3 years patients will be admitted to undergo a control invasive angiography.The CT-substudy and the PROCTOR registry is planned to be conducted too.
Multi-centre, randomised clinical trial with anticipated 17 European centres: in the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany and UK. Patients with a dysfunctional bypass graft with a clinical indication for revascularization will be randomized to either PCI of the native vessel or PCI of the dysfunctional venous bypass graft. The CT-substudy and the PROCTOR registry is planned to be conducted too (details included in the flow chart). CCTA substudy Selected patients will be approached for participation in the CCTA substudy of the trial. Participation in this substudy is optional. After written informed consent is obtained patients will undergo a CCTA in an out-patient setting. The CCTA will be performed before the PCI procedure. PROCTOR registry Patients can be approached for the registry when : * PCI have been deemed clinically indicated by the local hartteam, and * both the lesions in the native vessel and the dysfunctional graft have been deemed technically feasible by the local hartteam, * the patient does not meet the in- and exclusion criteria for the randomized PROCTOR study or declines to participate in the randomized study. Patients will be approached for participation and will have one week to consider. Written informed consent is mandatory for participating in the registry. Patients will be followed by telephonic follow-up after 1, 3, and 5 years. No additional study procedures will be performed. Study objectives:to investigate the clinical and angiographic outcome of native vessel PCI compared to PCI of venous bypass graft in patients with a dysfunctional venous bypass graft with a clinical indication for revascularization. 1. PROCTOR main study \- Investigate the clinical outcome of native vessel PCI vs. PCI of dysfunctional venous bypass graft with a clinical indication for revascularisation 2. CCTA substudy * Investigate prognostic value of CT-derived plaque characteristics for occurrence of MACE following bypass graft PCI * Investigate value of CCTA in guidance of CTO PCI procedures 3. PROCTOR Registry - Investigate long-term clinical outcomes in patients with dysfunctional venous bypass graft and an indication for PCI whom are not included in randomised main study. All patients with a significant stenosis (\>50% on coronary angiography) in a venous bypass graft discussed in the local heart team for revascularization will be screened for potential inclusion in the study. Patients will be eligible for inclusion if revascularization is deemed clinically indicated and technically feasible for PCI by the local heart team. The indication for revascularization will be based on symptoms and evidence of ischemia and viability in the target vessel territory. The lesion in the native vessel must be bypassed by a single venous graft or must be connected to a jump graft at the most distal anastomosis of that graft. In jump grafts, the lesion must be located distally to the second-to-last anastomosis. In case both the lesion in the native vessel and the lesion in the graft are deemed technically feasible for PCI, patients will be eligible for inclusion in the randomized study after consideration of in- and exclusion criteria. Patients who do not meet these criteria or decline to participate in the randomized study will be approached for inclusion in the registry. Subsequently patients will be approached for study participation. After being informed, patients will have at least 24 hours to consider participation. An independent physician will be available for extra information, if desired. After obtaining written informed consent, patients will be randomized to either native vessel PCI or PCI of the venous bypass graft. In case of PCI failure, a second attempt can be performed by the operator within one month. If feasible, it is possible to perform a second attempt in another high-volume center. When successful PCI cannot be accomplished in one or two attempts, cross-over to the other treatment arm may be used as bailout strategy to restore myocardial blood flow to the distal vascular bed of the vessel. Randomization will be performed using an interactive Web-based randomization system, Open Clinica. After 1 and 5 years, follow-up will be performed by means of a telephonic visit. After 3 years patients will be admitted to undergo a control invasive angiography.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Enrollment
221
PCI of the bypass graft will be performed by current standards and at the discretion of the operator. Only commercially available second generation DES - XIENCE Sierra will be used. In case of a CTO lesion, the aforementioned hybrid approach will be applied.This approach uses several angiographic characteristics to guide strategical planning of the procedure, using 4 complementary techniques to cross a CTO: antegrade wire escalation, antegrade dissection reentry, retrograde wire escalation, retrograde dissection reentry. In case of PCI failure, a second attempt can be performed within 1 month. Patients will be hospitalized for a min. of 6-8 hours after PCI and receive DAPT prior to the procedure or triple therapy in case of indication for oral anticoagulation, their duration according to the current guidelines of the ESC for stable coronary disease or ACS.
University Hospital
Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen (ZNA) Middelheim
Antwerp, Belgium
Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
Genk, Belgium
UZ Leuven
Leuven, Belgium
Universitäts Herzzentrum
Bad Krozingen, Germany
Universitair Medische Centra
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Academic Medical Center
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Amphia Ziekenhuis
Breda, Netherlands
Catharina Ziekenhuis
Eindhoven, Netherlands
Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden
Leeuwarden, Netherlands
...and 11 more locations
Amount and type of Major Adverse Cardiac Events
The total number and specification of major adverse cardiac events (all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target lesion revascularization).
Time frame: 3 year follow up
Amount and type of Major Adverse Cardiac Events
The total number and specification of major adverse cardiac events (all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target lesion revascularization).
Time frame: 1 and 5 year follow-up
Amount of patients that have passed away
Mortality score, all-cause mortality
Time frame: 1, 3 and 5 year follow-up
Number of non-fatal myocardial infarctions
Any non-fatal myocardial infarction noticed
Time frame: 1, 3 and 5 year follow-up
Number of clinically driven target lesion revascularizations
Any clinically driven target lesion revascularization noticed
Time frame: 1, 3 and 5 year follow-up
Number of target vessel revascularizations
Any target vessel revascularization noticed.
Time frame: 1, 3 and 5 year follow-up
Number of target vessel failure.
Any target vessel failure noticed
Time frame: 1, 3 and 5 year follow-up
Number of non-fatal myocardial infarctions.
Any non-fatal myocardial infarction noticed.
Time frame: >48 hours after PCI
Number of PCI-related myocardial infarctions.
Any PCI-related myocardial infarction noticed.
Time frame: 1, 3 and 5 year follow-up
Specific angiographic outcome
Any of the following outcomes: * Late lumen loss * In-stent binary restenosis (≥50%) * In-stent re-occlusion * Difference in in-stent diameter stenosis between index procedure at inclusion, and at 3-year follow-up
Time frame: 3-year follow up
Quality of life assessed by SAQ
The Seattle Angina Questionnaire is a self-assessment questionnaire where patients' physical limitations caused by angina are quantified, as well as the frequency of and changes in their symptoms, their satisfaction with treatment and how they perceive their Quality of Life. Each scale is transformed to a 0-100 scale. the higher the score, the better the patients functions/the higher the Quality of Life.
Time frame: 1, 3 and 5 year follow-up
Quality of life assessed by CCS
Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Grading Scale measures whether patient have angina pectoris complaints, and to what extent patients experienced this. It uses a scale of 1-4 where 1 means angina pectoris (chest pain) only occurs with streneous, rapid or prolonged exertion, and 4 means angina is present during little physical effort or even during rest.
Time frame: 1, 3 and 5 year follow-up
Quality of life assessed by RDS
Rose dyspnea scale questionnaire (RDS) measures dyspnea complaints, or shortness of breath. It consists of 4 questions about dysnpea complaints in the everyday life of patients. For every patient, a score is compiled of the highest limitation in daily life, resulting in a score of 0-4, where 0 means no dyspnea complaints and 4 means the patient has complaints during no or minimal physical effort. The scores from these questionnaires will be combined by summing the total scores.
Time frame: 1, 3 and 5 year follow-up
Composite score of quality of life
Composite of all quality of life questionnaires, where all outcomes are summed to provide a total score
Time frame: 3-year follow-up
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.