The purpose of the study is to investigate the safety and duration of effect following different doses of Botulinum Toxin A (NT 201) in the treatment of glabellar frown lines (GFL).
This prospective, randomized, double-blind, multi-Center clinical study consists of a two stage experimental main period comparing different dose groups, followed by an optional open-label extension period (20 Units follow-up treatment).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Enrollment
241
Clostridium Botulinum neurotoxin Type A free from complexing proteins. Solution for injection prepared by reconstitution of powder with 0.9% unpreserved Sodium Chloride (NaCl).
Clinical Testing of Beverly Hills, Merz Investigational Site #0010395
Encino, California, United States
Medical Associates Inc., Merz Investigational Site #0010435
Newport Beach, California, United States
Cosmetic Laser Dermatology, Merz Investigational Site #0010321
San Diego, California, United States
Duration of Effect Defined as Time Between Treatment and Relapse to Baseline Status Assessed by the Investigator on the FWS
Duration of effect: time between treatment and first occurrence of relapse to baseline status. If no effect was observed, duration of effect was set to 0. Effect: any improvement (at least 1 point) at maximum frown as assessed by investigator on FWS. Investigator's FWS assessed status of GFL according to 4-point severity grades at maximum frown as: 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (severe). Descriptors of each severity grade for investigator's FWS assessment at maximum frown were as: 0 (no muscle action at all), 1 (some even slight muscle action possible \[that is, visible furrows\]), 2 (moderately strong muscle action possible \[that is, visible muscle bulges\]), 3 (strong muscle action possible which may cause local pallor). Duration of effect was analyzed using Kaplan-meier analysis, and 95 percent (%) confidence interval (CI) were calculated using log-log transformation.
Time frame: From the time of first treatment up to Day 360
Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
Time frame: From the time of first treatment up to Day 390
Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Event (TESAE)
Time frame: From the time of first treatment up to Day 390
Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Event of Special Interest (TEAESI)
Time frame: From the time of first treatment up to Day 390
Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment Related TEAE
Time frame: From the time of first treatment up to Day 390
Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment Related TESAE
Time frame: From the time of first treatment up to Day 390
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
The Maas Clinics, Merz Investigational Site #0010338
San Francisco, California, United States
Tennessee Clinical Research Center, Merz Investigational Site #0010097
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Privatpraxis für Dermatologie und Ästhetische Medizin, Merz Investigational Site #0490306
Berlin, Germany
Universität Hamburg, Fachrichtung Kosmetik und Körperpflege, Merz Investigational Site #0490095
Hamburg, Germany
Dermatologische Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr. Prager und Partner, Merz Investigational Site #0490345
Hamburg, Germany
Skin & Laser Center, Merz Investigational Site #0490362
Potsdam, Germany
Duration of Effect Whereby Effect Was Defined as Score of None (0) or Mild (1) at Maximum Frown as Assessed by the Investigator According to FWS
Duration of effect was defined as time between treatment and first point in time when score was moderate or severe again. If no effect was observed, duration of effect was set to 0. Effect was defined by a score of none (0) or mild (1) at maximum frown as assessed by investigator according to FWS. Investigator's FWS assessed status of GFL according to 4-point severity grades at maximum frown as: 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (severe). Descriptors of each severity grade for investigator's FWS assessment at maximum frown were as: 0 (no muscle action at all), 1 (some even slight muscle action possible \[that is, visible furrows\]), 2 (moderately strong muscle action possible \[that is, visible muscle bulges\]), 3 (strong muscle action possible which may cause local pallor). Duration of effect was analyzed using Kaplan-meier analysis, and 95% CI were calculated using log-log transformation.
Time frame: From the time of first treatment up to Day 360
Duration of Effect Whereby Effect Was Defined by 2-point Improvement From Baseline at Maximum Frown as Assessed by the Investigator According to FWS
Duration of effect: time between treatment and first point in time when improvement was less than 2 points again. If no effect was observed, duration of effect was set to 0. Effect: at least a 2-point improvement from baseline at maximum frown as assessed by investigator on the FWS. Investigator's FWS assessed status of GFL according to 4-point severity grades at maximum frown as: 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (severe). Descriptors of each severity grade for investigator's FWS assessment at maximum frown were as: 0 (no muscle action at all), 1 (some even slight muscle action possible \[that is, visible furrows\]), 2 (moderately strong muscle action possible \[that is, visible muscle bulges\]), 3 (strong muscle action possible which may cause local pallor). Duration of effect was analyzed using Kaplan-meier analysis, and 95% CI were calculated using log-log transformation.
Time frame: From the time of first treatment up to Day 360
Percentage of Participants Rated as None (0) or Mild (1) at Maximum Frown by Investigator's Rating on FWS
Investigator's FWS assessed status of GFL according to the 4-point severity grades at maximum frown as: 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (severe). Descriptors of each severity grade for investigator's FWS assessment at maximum frown were as: 0 (no muscle action at all), 1 (some even slight muscle action possible \[that is, visible furrows\]), 2 (moderately strong muscle action possible \[that is, visible muscle bulges\]), 3 (strong muscle action possible which may cause local pallor). 95% CIs for percentage of participants were based on Pearson-clopper method.
Time frame: At Day 180
Percentage of Participants Rated as None (0) or Mild (1) at Maximum Frown by Participant's Rating on FWS
Participant's FWS assessed status of GFL according to the 4-point severity grades at maximum frown as: 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (severe). Descriptors of each severity grade for participant's FWS assessment at maximum frown were as: 0 (no muscle action at all), 1 (some even slight muscle action possible \[that is, visible furrows\]), 2 (moderately strong muscle action possible \[that is, visible muscle bulges\]), 3 (strong muscle action possible which may cause local pallor). 95% CI for percentage of participants were based on Pearson-clopper method.
Time frame: At Day 180
Percentage of Participants Rated as at Least 1-point Improvement Compared to Baseline at Maximum Frown by Investigator's Rating on FWS
Investigator's FWS assessed status of GFL according to the 4-point severity grades at maximum frown as: 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (severe). Descriptors of each severity grade for investigator's FWS assessment at maximum frown were as: 0 (no muscle action at all), 1 (some even slight muscle action possible \[that is, visible furrows\]), 2 (moderately strong muscle action possible \[that is, visible muscle bulges\]), 3 (strong muscle action possible which may cause local pallor). 95% CI for percentage of participants were based on Pearson-clopper method.
Time frame: At Day 180
Percentage of Participants Rated as at Least 1-point Improvement Compared to Baseline at Maximum Frown by Participant's Rating on FWS
Participant's FWS assessed status of GFL according to the 4-point severity grades at maximum frown as: 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (severe). Descriptors of each severity grade for participant's FWS assessment at maximum frown were as: 0 (no muscle action at all), 1 (some even slight muscle action possible \[that is, visible furrows\]), 2 (moderately strong muscle action possible \[that is, visible muscle bulges\]), 3 (strong muscle action possible which may cause local pallor). 95% CI for percentage of participants were based on Pearson-clopper method.
Time frame: At Day 180