The purpose of this study is to advance the understanding of people who experience urinary and bladder problems. The investigators are interested in learning about people's experiences with urinary symptoms and how these symptoms will be managed. The investigators want to understand the important differences among people and what factors affect urinary and bladder problems. After all of the information is collected, the investigators will have a better understanding of how to improve the care and treatment for people who have urinary and bladder problems.
This protocol is part of an overall effort to create a state-of-the-art resource for measuring patient-reported health for patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD). The primary purpose of this resource, known as the LURN PRO Battery, is to comprehensively characterize the self-reported experiences of patients with LUTD for the purpose of enhancing efforts to characterize and explain important subtypes of patients with LUTD (phenotypes). Secondary purposes of the LURN PRO Battery, for which additional development work will be required, include developing better patient-reported endpoints for clinical trials, monitoring symptoms in the course of clinical care, and screening patients into important subgroups for purposes of tailored interventions. Incorporating methods the investigators have used successfully in prior measure validation work, the investigators propose to conduct a diary study in which patients record their symptoms at various time points - at the end of each day, or across multiple days. The investigators also ask them to complete self-report measures with different recall periods (i.e., 3-day, 7-day, and 30-day recall), and will determine how well each of these correspond to daily experiences recorded in more frequent assessments (i.e., end-of-day and 3-day patient bladder diaries). These data will help LURN investigators to determine the most appropriate reporting period for specific symptoms. This study can also help to identify causes of differences that exist between shorter and longer recall periods.
Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment
515
None- Observational Study
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, United States
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Washington University
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Determine ideal recall period for LUTS symptoms
The investigators will administer and analyze the correspondence between patient's average daily recall of their LUTS utilizing seven, daily questionnaires, their weekly recall of self-reported LUTS using a 7-day recall questionnaire, as well as a questionnaire assessing their monthly LUTS recall in order to determine the best recall period to utilize when administering LUTS questionnaires in clinical settings.
Time frame: Through study completion - 30 days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, United States
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, United States