Here we propose a protocol for assessing the feasibility and acceptability of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of an online transdiagnostic psychoeducational intervention called 'A Bite of ACT' (BOA) compared to a waitlist control.
Introduction: Recent studies reveal a high prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms among university students, highlighting an urgent need for preventative measures at low cost to better support often overwhelmed support services. Objectives: Here we propose a protocol for assessing the feasibility and acceptability of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of an online transdiagnostic psychoeducational intervention called 'A Bite of ACT' (BOA) compared to a waitlist control. Methods and analysis: A randomised controlled trial with crossover design will be conducted at baseline, and two follow-up periods. The primary outcome measure will be the ACCEPT checklist, while secondary outcomes include measures of wellbeing, depression, anxiety, and stress (DASS21) and a process measure (psychological flexibility AAQII). Qualitative interviews and preliminary health economics analysis will provide additional insights. Analysis will focus on descriptive statistics and feasibility outcomes and calculate a treatment effect size to determine sample size needed for any future trial (if indicated).
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Enrollment
60
An online Acceptance and Commitment Therapy transdiagnostic psychoeducational intervention called 'A Bite of ACT' (BOA)
Swansea University
Swansea, Wales, United Kingdom
Acceptance Checklist for Clinical Effectiveness Pilot Trials (ACCEPT) (Charlesworth, Burnell, Hoe, Orrell, & Russell, 2013)
Acceptance Checklist for Clinical Effectiveness Pilot Trials (ACCEPT)
Time frame: One years (anticipated)
Depression Anxiety Stress Scales
Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (short-form DASS-21). This is the short version of this measure and is a general psychological distress measure with good construct validity (confirmatory factor analysis of 0.94). It has good internal reliability as measured through Cronbach's alpha coefficients, which are 0.88 for depression, 0.82 for anxiety, 0.90 for stress and 0.93 for the total scale (Henry \& Crawford, 2005).
Time frame: One years (anticipated)
Social connectedness
Social connectedness (adapted from Russell's (1996) UCLA Loneliness Scale (Kok et al., 2013). This includes two questions; (1) "During these social interactions, I felt 'in tune' with the person/s around me", and (2) "During these social interactions, I felt close to the person/s." Responses are made on a 7-point scale (1 = not at all true, 7 = very true). The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for these two items ranged from .80 to .98 (M = .94, SD = .03) (Kok et al., 2013).
Time frame: One years (anticipated)
EuroQol five dimensions
EuroQol five dimensions (EQ5D). The EQ5D is a measure for health-related quality of life (HRQOL) statues. Within it, there are five components which assess mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, as well as anxiety. It also has a visual analogue scale (VAS) for measuring current health status. Scores for these will be calculated for each of these five subsections as well as including the VIS and total EQ5D score of all five subsections. The EQD5 correlates well with other health related questionnaires such as the SF-36 (r = 0.61, p\<0.0001) and PDQ-39 (r = -0.75, p\<0.0001) (Schrag, Selai, Jahanshahi, \& Quinn, 2000).
Time frame: One years (anticipated)
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS)
Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS) (Tennant et al., 2007). Is a measure of mental well-being with a focus on positive aspects of mental health. It has good internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.89 (student sample) and 0.91 (general population sample).
Time frame: One years (anticipated)