This study is to evaluate the safety and technical performance of the Cardiovalve Transfemoral Mitral Valve System with its associated procedure, to minimize mitral regurgitation. Data collected in this clinical study will include 30-day safety and performance of the device and delivery system, and long-term clinical outcomes over a follow-up of 5 years.
The Cardiovalve offers a replacement valve delivered through a transfemoral access and transseptal approach, and is intended to reduce mortality and adverse event rates in selected patients for whom surgical options are not feasible. Innovation: A truly transfemoral, trans venous delivery of the valve which minimizes procedural risk. The Cardiovalve implant has a very low left ventricle (LV) protrusion footprint thus reducing the risk of LV outflow tract obstruction and/or interference with the LV. The experience to date is limited but thus far none of the clinical programs has been halted for safety reasons. Most of the technologies have focused on a transapical delivery approach (with mini-thoracotomy access) to further simplify the delivery method, with only a few allowing trans-septal delivery with femoral venous access.
Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Enrollment
1
The Cardiovalve Transfemoral Mitral Valve System is intended for use symptomatic patients with severe mitral regurgitation who are at elevated risk for surgical mitral valve repair or replacement and who are anatomically eligible for transfemoral mitral valve replacement with transseptal access to the left atrium.
Piedmont Heart Institute
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Columbia University Medical Center/NYPH
New York, New York, United States
Number of Participants With Cardiovalve Technical Success
1. Successful access, delivery and retrieval of the delivery system; and 2. Successful deployment and correct positioning of the first intended implant; and 3. Freedom from emergency surgery or reintervention related to the device or access procedure Without any procedural mortality, stroke, and device dysfunction (Central MR grade \> 1 or paravalvular leak moderate or severe, mean mitral gradient \> 6 mm Hg, LVOT obstruction (gradient increase ≥10 mm Hg)) at 30-day follow up.
Time frame: 30 Days
Number of Participants With Major Device Related Adverse Events Through 30 Days
1. Death (Cardiovascular mortality vs non-cardiovascular); 2. Reintervention (operative or transcatheter) due to progressive or recurrent MR or device related complications; 3. Disabling Stroke; 4. Myocardial infarction (MVARC definition); 5. Major access site and vascular complications 6. Fatal or Life-threatening bleeding (MVARC Type III- V) 7. Life-threatening arrhythmia; 8. Renal Failure requiring dialysis;
Time frame: 30 Days
This platform is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.